Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Search results

Items: 1 to 50 of 120

1.

EEG dynamics reveal a dissociation between storage and selective attention within working memory.

Günseli E, Fahrenfort JJ, van Moorselaar D, Daoultzis KC, Meeter M, Olivers CNL.

Sci Rep. 2019 Sep 18;9(1):13499. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-49577-0.

2.

The Flexible Nature of the Interaction Between Attention and Working Memory.

Van der Stigchel S, Olivers CNL.

J Cogn. 2019 Aug 8;2(1):31. doi: 10.5334/joc.68.

3.

Frontal cortex differentiates between free and imposed target selection in multiple-target search.

Ort E, Fahrenfort JJ, Reeder R, Pollmann S, Olivers CNL.

Neuroimage. 2019 Aug 28;202:116133. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116133. [Epub ahead of print]

4.

Humans can efficiently look for but not select multiple visual objects.

Ort E, Fahrenfort JJ, Ten Cate T, Eimer M, Olivers CN.

Elife. 2019 Aug 27;8. pii: e49130. doi: 10.7554/eLife.49130.

5.

Oscillatory Mechanisms of Preparing for Visual Distraction.

de Vries IEJ, Savran E, van Driel J, Olivers CNL.

J Cogn Neurosci. 2019 Aug 16:1-22. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01460. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
31418334
6.

Extrafoveal attentional capture by object semantics.

Nuthmann A, de Groot F, Huettig F, Olivers CNL.

PLoS One. 2019 May 23;14(5):e0217051. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217051. eCollection 2019. Erratum in: PLoS One. 2019 Jun 12;14(6):e0218502.

7.

Prospectively reinstated memory drives conscious access of matching visual input.

Gayet S, Moorselaar DV, Olivers CNL, Paffen CLE, Stigchel SV.

Sci Rep. 2019 Mar 18;9(1):4793. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-41350-7.

8.

Decoding the status of working memory representations in preparation of visual selection.

de Vries IEJ, van Driel J, Olivers CNL.

Neuroimage. 2019 May 1;191:549-559. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.02.069. Epub 2019 Mar 3.

9.

Beta and Theta Oscillations Differentially Support Free Versus Forced Control over Multiple-Target Search.

van Driel J, Ort E, Fahrenfort JJ, Olivers CNL.

J Neurosci. 2019 Feb 27;39(9):1733-1743. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2547-18.2018. Epub 2019 Jan 7.

10.

Current and future goals are represented in opposite patterns in object-selective cortex.

van Loon AM, Olmos-Solis K, Fahrenfort JJ, Olivers CN.

Elife. 2018 Nov 6;7. pii: e38677. doi: 10.7554/eLife.38677.

11.

No evidence for enhanced distractor template representation in early visual cortex.

Reeder RR, Olivers CNL, Hanke M, Pollmann S.

Cortex. 2018 Nov;108:279-282. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2018.08.005. Epub 2018 Aug 27. No abstract available.

PMID:
30245200
12.

Priority Switches in Visual Working Memory are Supported by Frontal Delta and Posterior Alpha Interactions.

de Vries IEJ, van Driel J, Karacaoglu M, Olivers CNL.

Cereb Cortex. 2018 Nov 1;28(11):4090-4104. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhy223.

13.

Lack of free choice reveals the cost of multiple-target search within and across feature dimensions.

Ort E, Fahrenfort JJ, Olivers CNL.

Atten Percept Psychophys. 2018 Nov;80(8):1904-1917. doi: 10.3758/s13414-018-1579-7.

PMID:
30088257
14.

Author Correction: Multivariate EEG analyses support high-resolution tracking of feature-based attentional selection.

Fahrenfort JJ, Grubert A, Olivers CNL, Eimer M.

Sci Rep. 2018 Jul 20;8(1):11236. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-29326-5.

15.

From ERPs to MVPA Using the Amsterdam Decoding and Modeling Toolbox (ADAM).

Fahrenfort JJ, van Driel J, van Gaal S, Olivers CNL.

Front Neurosci. 2018 Jul 3;12:368. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00368. eCollection 2018.

16.

Pupil Dilation Reflects Task Relevance Prior to Search.

Olmos-Solis K, van Loon AM, Olivers CNL.

J Cogn. 2018 Jan 26;1(1):11. doi: 10.5334/joc.12.

17.

On the brink: The demise of the item in visual search moves closer.

Hulleman J, Olivers CNL.

Behav Brain Sci. 2017 Jan;40:e163. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X16000364.

PMID:
29342613
18.

Oculomotor measures reveal the temporal dynamics of preparing for search.

Olmos-Solis K, van Loon AM, Los SA, Olivers CNL.

Prog Brain Res. 2017;236:1-23. doi: 10.1016/bs.pbr.2017.07.003. Epub 2017 Aug 14.

PMID:
29157407
19.

When shorter delays lead to worse memories: Task disruption makes visual working memory temporarily vulnerable to test interference.

Wang B, Theeuwes J, Olivers CNL.

J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2018 May;44(5):722-733. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000468. Epub 2017 Nov 2.

PMID:
29094991
20.

Spatially Selective Alpha Oscillations Reveal Moment-by-Moment Trade-offs between Working Memory and Attention.

van Moorselaar D, Foster JJ, Sutterer DW, Theeuwes J, Olivers CNL, Awh E.

J Cogn Neurosci. 2018 Feb;30(2):256-266. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01198. Epub 2017 Oct 17.

21.

Lack of Free Choice Reveals the Cost of Having to Search for More Than One Object.

Ort E, Fahrenfort JJ, Olivers CNL.

Psychol Sci. 2017 Aug;28(8):1137-1147. doi: 10.1177/0956797617705667. Epub 2017 Jun 29.

22.

Subtle eye movement metrics reveal task-relevant representations prior to visual search.

van Loon AM, Olmos-Solis K, Olivers CNL.

J Vis. 2017 Jun 1;17(6):13. doi: 10.1167/17.6.13.

PMID:
28637052
23.

Multivariate EEG analyses support high-resolution tracking of feature-based attentional selection.

Fahrenfort JJ, Grubert A, Olivers CNL, Eimer M.

Sci Rep. 2017 May 15;7(1):1886. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-01911-0. Erratum in: Sci Rep. 2018 Jul 20;8(1):11236.

24.

Competitive interactions in visual working memory drive access to awareness.

van Moorselaar D, Gayet S, Paffen CLE, Theeuwes J, Van der Stigchel S, Olivers CNL.

Cortex. 2018 May;102:6-13. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2017.03.026. Epub 2017 Apr 8.

PMID:
28483160
25.

Perceptual integration without conscious access.

Fahrenfort JJ, van Leeuwen J, Olivers CN, Hogendoorn H.

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Apr 4;114(14):3744-3749. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1617268114. Epub 2017 Mar 21.

26.

Evolving the keys to visual crowding.

Van der Burg E, Olivers CN, Cass J.

J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2017 Apr;43(4):690-699. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000337. Epub 2017 Feb 9.

PMID:
28182476
27.

Local and interregional alpha EEG dynamics dissociate between memory for search and memory for recognition.

van Driel J, Gunseli E, Meeter M, Olivers CNL.

Neuroimage. 2017 Apr 1;149:114-128. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.01.031. Epub 2017 Jan 26.

PMID:
28132933
28.

Posterior α EEG Dynamics Dissociate Current from Future Goals in Working Memory-Guided Visual Search.

de Vries IE, van Driel J, Olivers CN.

J Neurosci. 2017 Feb 8;37(6):1591-1603. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2945-16.2016. Epub 2017 Jan 9.

29.

Adverse orienting effects on visual working memory encoding and maintenance.

Wang B, Yan C, Wang Z, Olivers CNL, Theeuwes J.

Psychon Bull Rev. 2017 Aug;24(4):1261-1267. doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1205-4.

30.

The capacity to detect synchronous audiovisual events is severely limited: Evidence from mixture modeling.

Olivers CNL, Awh E, Van der Burg E.

J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2016 Dec;42(12):2115-2124. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000268.

PMID:
27854458
31.

The pupillary light response reflects encoding, but not maintenance, in visual working memory.

Blom T, Mathôt S, Olivers CN, Van der Stigchel S.

J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2016 Nov;42(11):1716-1723. Epub 2016 Jul 18.

PMID:
27428779
32.

Location-based effects underlie feature conjunction benefits in visual working memory.

Wang B, Cao X, Theeuwes J, Olivers CN, Wang Z.

J Vis. 2016 Sep 1;16(11):12. doi: 10.1167/16.11.12.

PMID:
27627735
33.

Rapid top-down control over template-guided attention shifts to multiple objects.

Grubert A, Fahrenfort J, Olivers CNL, Eimer M.

Neuroimage. 2017 Feb 1;146:843-858. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.08.039. Epub 2016 Aug 21.

PMID:
27554532
34.

Separate capacities for storing different features in visual working memory.

Wang B, Cao X, Theeuwes J, Olivers CN, Wang Z.

J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2017 Feb;43(2):226-236. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000295. Epub 2016 Jul 11.

PMID:
27399920
35.

Learning changes the attentional status of prospective memories.

van Moorselaar D, Theeuwes J, Olivers CN.

Psychon Bull Rev. 2016 Oct;23(5):1483-1490.

36.

The impending demise of the item in visual search.

Hulleman J, Olivers CNL.

Behav Brain Sci. 2017 Jan;40:e132. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X15002794. Epub 2015 Dec 17.

PMID:
26673054
37.

Task-irrelevant memories rapidly gain attentional control with learning.

Gunseli E, Olivers CNL, Meeter M.

J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2016 Mar;42(3):354-362. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000134. Epub 2015 Oct 5.

PMID:
26436527
38.

When meaning matters: The temporal dynamics of semantic influences on visual attention.

de Groot F, Huettig F, Olivers CN.

J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2016 Feb;42(2):180-96. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000102. Epub 2015 Aug 31.

PMID:
26322686
39.

The behavioral urgency of objects approaching your avatar.

Schreij D, Olivers CN.

Atten Percept Psychophys. 2015 Nov;77(8):2669-83. doi: 10.3758/s13414-015-0966-6.

40.

Erratum to: The reliability of retro-cues determines the fate of noncued visual working memory representations.

Gunseli E, van Moorselaar D, Meeter M, Olivers CN.

Psychon Bull Rev. 2015 Oct;22(5):1474. doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0914-4. No abstract available.

PMID:
26223470
41.

Forgotten but not gone: Retro-cue costs and benefits in a double-cueing paradigm suggest multiple states in visual short-term memory.

van Moorselaar D, Olivers CN, Theeuwes J, Lamme VA, Sligte IG.

J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2015 Nov;41(6):1755-63. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000124. Epub 2015 Apr 13. Erratum in: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2015 Nov;41(6):1727.

PMID:
25867613
42.

The reliability of retro-cues determines the fate of noncued visual working memory representations.

Gunseli E, van Moorselaar D, Meeter M, Olivers CN.

Psychon Bull Rev. 2015 Oct;22(5):1334-41. doi: 10.3758/s13423-014-0796-x. Erratum in: Psychon Bull Rev. 2015 Oct;22(5):1474.

PMID:
25563713
43.

Rapid influences of cued visual memories on attentional guidance.

van Moorselaar D, Battistoni E, Theeuwes J, Olivers CN.

Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2015 Mar;1339:1-10. doi: 10.1111/nyas.12574. Epub 2014 Nov 26.

PMID:
25428708
44.

Nonspecific competition underlies transient attention.

Wilschut A, Theeuwes J, Olivers CN.

Psychol Res. 2015 Sep;79(5):844-60. doi: 10.1007/s00426-014-0605-1. Epub 2014 Sep 4.

PMID:
25187215
45.

Visual memory performance for color depends on spatiotemporal context.

Olivers CN, Schreij D.

Atten Percept Psychophys. 2014 Oct;76(7):1873-84. doi: 10.3758/s13414-014-0741-0.

PMID:
25073612
46.

Is a search template an ordinary working memory? Comparing electrophysiological markers of working memory maintenance for visual search and recognition.

Gunseli E, Meeter M, Olivers CN.

Neuropsychologia. 2014 Jul;60:29-38. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.05.012. Epub 2014 May 28.

PMID:
24878275
47.

In competition for the attentional template: can multiple items within visual working memory guide attention?

van Moorselaar D, Theeuwes J, Olivers CN.

J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2014 Aug;40(4):1450-64. doi: 10.1037/a0036229. Epub 2014 Apr 14.

PMID:
24730738
48.

Effects of search difficulty on the selection, maintenance, and learning of attentional templates.

Gunseli E, Olivers CN, Meeter M.

J Cogn Neurosci. 2014 Sep;26(9):2042-54. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00600. Epub 2014 Mar 25.

PMID:
24666133
49.

Priming and the guidance by visual and categorical templates in visual search.

Wilschut A, Theeuwes J, Olivers CN.

Front Psychol. 2014 Feb 24;5:148. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00148. eCollection 2014.

50.

Target features and target-distractor relation are both primed in visual search.

Meeter M, Olivers CN.

Atten Percept Psychophys. 2014 Apr;76(3):682-94. doi: 10.3758/s13414-013-0611-1.

PMID:
24415176

Supplemental Content

Loading ...
Support Center