Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Search results

Items: 27

1.

Do 'early' brain responses reveal word form prediction during language comprehension? A critical review.

Nieuwland MS.

Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2019 Jan;96:367-400. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.11.019. Review.

PMID:
30621862
2.

Large-scale replication study reveals a limit on probabilistic prediction in language comprehension.

Nieuwland MS, Politzer-Ahles S, Heyselaar E, Segaert K, Darley E, Kazanina N, Von Grebmer Zu Wolfsthurn S, Bartolozzi F, Kogan V, Ito A, Mézière D, Barr DJ, Rousselet GA, Ferguson HJ, Busch-Moreno S, Fu X, Tuomainen J, Kulakova E, Husband EM, Donaldson DI, Kohút Z, Rueschemeyer SA, Huettig F.

Elife. 2018 Apr 3;7. pii: e33468. doi: 10.7554/eLife.33468.

3.

Can structural priming answer the important questions about language?

Martin AE, Huettig F, Nieuwland MS.

Behav Brain Sci. 2017 Jan;40:e304. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X17000528.

PMID:
29342732
4.

Neural Oscillations and a Nascent Corticohippocampal Theory of Reference.

Nieuwland MS, Martin AE.

J Cogn Neurosci. 2017 May;29(5):896-910. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01091. Epub 2017 Jan 27.

PMID:
28129065
5.

On predicting form and meaning in a second language.

Ito A, Martin AE, Nieuwland MS.

J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2017 Apr;43(4):635-652. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000315. Epub 2016 Sep 26.

PMID:
27668483
6.

Neural correlates of verbal joint action: ERPs reveal common perception and action systems in a shared-Stroop task.

Demiral ŞB, Gambi C, Nieuwland MS, Pickering MJ.

Brain Res. 2016 Oct 15;1649(Pt A):79-89. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2016.08.025. Epub 2016 Aug 20.

PMID:
27553631
7.

Understanding Counterfactuality: A Review of Experimental Evidence for the Dual Meaning of Counterfactuals.

Kulakova E, Nieuwland MS.

Lang Linguist Compass. 2016 Feb;10(2):49-65. Epub 2016 Feb 3.

8.

Incremental comprehension of spoken quantifier sentences: Evidence from brain potentials.

Freunberger D, Nieuwland MS.

Brain Res. 2016 Sep 1;1646:475-481. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2016.06.035. Epub 2016 Jun 23.

9.

Pragmatic skills predict online counterfactual comprehension: Evidence from the N400.

Kulakova E, Nieuwland MS.

Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2016 Oct;16(5):814-24. doi: 10.3758/s13415-016-0433-4.

10.

Quantification, prediction, and the online impact of sentence truth-value: Evidence from event-related potentials.

Nieuwland MS.

J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2016 Feb;42(2):316-34. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000173. Epub 2015 Aug 10.

11.

The Truth Before and After: Brain Potentials Reveal Automatic Activation of Event Knowledge during Sentence Comprehension.

Nieuwland MS.

J Cogn Neurosci. 2015 Nov;27(11):2215-28. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00856. Epub 2015 Aug 5.

PMID:
26244719
12.

Agreement attraction during comprehension of grammatical sentences: ERP evidence from ellipsis.

Martin AE, Nieuwland MS, Carreiras M.

Brain Lang. 2014 Aug;135:42-51. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2014.05.001. Epub 2014 Jun 7.

PMID:
24911918
13.

Event-related brain potential evidence for animacy processing asymmetries during sentence comprehension.

Nieuwland MS, Martin AE, Carreiras M.

Brain Lang. 2013 Aug;126(2):151-8. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2013.04.005. Epub 2013 Jun 4.

14.
15.

If the real world were irrelevant, so to speak: The role of propositional truth-value in counterfactual sentence comprehension.

Nieuwland MS, Martin AE.

Cognition. 2012 Jan;122(1):102-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2011.09.001. Epub 2011 Oct 1.

PMID:
21962826
16.

Event-related brain potentials index cue-based retrieval interference during sentence comprehension.

Martin AE, Nieuwland MS, Carreiras M.

Neuroimage. 2012 Jan 16;59(2):1859-69. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.08.057. Epub 2011 Sep 5.

PMID:
21925613
17.

Brain regions that process case: evidence from Basque.

Nieuwland MS, Martin AE, Carreiras M.

Hum Brain Mapp. 2012 Nov;33(11):2509-20. doi: 10.1002/hbm.21377. Epub 2011 Sep 6.

PMID:
21898678
18.
19.

When the truth is not too hard to handle: an event-related potential study on the pragmatics of negation.

Nieuwland MS, Kuperberg GR.

Psychol Sci. 2008 Dec;19(12):1213-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02226.x.

20.

The interplay between semantic and referential aspects of anaphoric noun phrase resolution: Evidence from ERPs.

Nieuwland MS, Van Berkum JJ.

Brain Lang. 2008 Aug;106(2):119-31. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2008.05.001. Epub 2008 Jun 16.

PMID:
18556057
21.
22.

On sense and reference: examining the functional neuroanatomy of referential processing.

Nieuwland MS, Petersson KM, Van Berkum JJ.

Neuroimage. 2007 Sep 1;37(3):993-1004. Epub 2007 Jun 7.

PMID:
17611124
23.

Who are you talking about? Tracking discourse-level referential processing with event-related brain potentials.

Nieuwland MS, Otten M, Van Berkum JJ.

J Cogn Neurosci. 2007 Feb;19(2):228-36.

PMID:
17280512
24.

Individual differences and contextual bias in pronoun resolution: evidence from ERPs.

Nieuwland MS, Van Berkum JJ.

Brain Res. 2006 Nov 6;1118(1):155-67. Epub 2006 Sep 7.

PMID:
16956594
25.

Establishing reference in language comprehension: an electrophysiological perspective.

Van Berkum JJ, Koornneef AW, Otten M, Nieuwland MS.

Brain Res. 2007 May 18;1146:158-71. Epub 2006 Aug 17.

PMID:
16916496
26.

When peanuts fall in love: N400 evidence for the power of discourse.

Nieuwland MS, Van Berkum JJ.

J Cogn Neurosci. 2006 Jul;18(7):1098-111.

PMID:
16839284
27.

Supplemental Content

Loading ...
Support Center