Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Search results

Items: 27

1.

The effects of preferred natural stimuli on humans' affective states, physiological stress and mental health, and the potential implications for well-being in captive animals.

Ross M, Mason GJ.

Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2017 Dec;83:46-62. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.09.012. Epub 2017 Sep 12. Review.

PMID:
28916271
2.

The Days and Nights of Zoo Elephants: Using Epidemiology to Better Understand Stereotypic Behavior of African Elephants (Loxodonta africana) and Asian Elephants (Elephas maximus) in North American Zoos.

Greco BJ, Meehan CL, Hogan JN, Leighty KA, Mellen J, Mason GJ, Mench JA.

PLoS One. 2016 Jul 14;11(7):e0144276. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144276. eCollection 2016.

3.

Play in juvenile mink: litter effects, stability over time, and motivational heterogeneity.

Ahloy Dallaire J, Mason GJ.

Dev Psychobiol. 2016 Dec;58(8):945-957. doi: 10.1002/dev.21425. Epub 2016 May 17.

PMID:
27183962
4.

Cage-induced stereotypic behaviour in laboratory mice covaries with nucleus accumbens FosB/ΔFosB expression.

Phillips D, Choleris E, Ervin KS, Fureix C, Harper L, Reynolds K, Niel L, Mason GJ.

Behav Brain Res. 2016 Mar 15;301:238-42. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2015.12.035. Epub 2015 Dec 28.

PMID:
26731014
5.

Benefits of a ball and chain: simple environmental enrichments improve welfare and reproductive success in farmed American mink (Neovison vison).

Meagher RK, Ahloy Dallaire J, Campbell DL, Ross M, Møller SH, Hansen SW, Díez-León M, Palme R, Mason GJ.

PLoS One. 2014 Nov 11;9(11):e110589. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0110589. eCollection 2014.

6.

Competition during the milk-feeding stage influences the development of feeding behavior of pair-housed dairy calves.

Miller-Cushon EK, Bergeron R, Leslie KE, Mason GJ, DeVries TJ.

J Dairy Sci. 2014 Oct;97(10):6450-62. doi: 10.3168/jds.2014-8065. Epub 2014 Aug 6.

7.

Effect of feed presentation on feeding patterns of dairy calves.

Miller-Cushon EK, Bergeron R, Leslie KE, Mason GJ, DeVries TJ.

J Dairy Sci. 2013;96(11):7260-8. doi: 10.3168/jds.2013-7013. Epub 2013 Sep 12.

8.

Winning the genetic lottery: biasing birth sex ratio results in more grandchildren.

Thogerson CM, Brady CM, Howard RD, Mason GJ, Pajor EA, Vicino GA, Garner JP.

PLoS One. 2013 Jul 10;8(7):e67867. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0067867. Print 2013.

9.

Effect of early exposure to different feed presentations on feed sorting of dairy calves.

Miller-Cushon EK, Bergeron R, Leslie KE, Mason GJ, Devries TJ.

J Dairy Sci. 2013 Jul;96(7):4624-33. doi: 10.3168/jds.2013-6670. Epub 2013 May 16.

10.

Environmentally enriched rearing environments reduce repetitive perseveration in caged mink, but increase spontaneous alternation.

Campbell DL, Dallaire JA, Mason GJ.

Behav Brain Res. 2013 Feb 15;239:177-87. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2012.11.004. Epub 2012 Nov 14.

PMID:
23159704
11.

Environmental enrichment reduces signs of boredom in caged mink.

Meagher RK, Mason GJ.

PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e49180. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0049180. Epub 2012 Nov 14.

12.

Recurrent perseveration correlates with abnormal repetitive locomotion in adult mink but is not reduced by environmental enrichment.

Dallaire JA, Meagher RK, Díez-León M, Garner JP, Mason GJ.

Behav Brain Res. 2011 Oct 31;224(2):213-22. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2011.03.061. Epub 2011 Apr 2.

PMID:
21466825
13.

Species differences in responses to captivity: stress, welfare and the comparative method.

Mason GJ.

Trends Ecol Evol. 2010 Dec;25(12):713-21. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2010.08.011. Epub 2010 Oct 16. Review.

PMID:
20952089
14.

Feed delivery method affects the learning of feeding and competitive behavior in dairy heifers.

Greter AM, Leslie KE, Mason GJ, McBride BW, DeVries TJ.

J Dairy Sci. 2010 Aug;93(8):3730-7. doi: 10.3168/jds.2009-2978.

15.

Effect of feed delivery method on the behavior and growth of dairy heifers.

Greter AM, Leslie KE, Mason GJ, McBride BW, Devries TJ.

J Dairy Sci. 2010 Apr;93(4):1668-76. doi: 10.3168/jds.2009-2844.

16.

What do population-level welfare indices suggest about the well-being of zoo elephants?

Mason GJ, Veasey JS.

Zoo Biol. 2010 Mar-Apr;29(2):256-73. doi: 10.1002/zoo.20303.

PMID:
20140956
17.

How should the psychological well-being of zoo elephants be objectively investigated?

Mason GJ, Veasey JS.

Zoo Biol. 2010 Mar-Apr;29(2):237-55. doi: 10.1002/zoo.20256. Review.

PMID:
19514018
18.

Compromised survivorship in zoo elephants.

Clubb R, Rowcliffe M, Lee P, Mar KU, Moss C, Mason GJ.

Science. 2008 Dec 12;322(5908):1649. doi: 10.1126/science.1164298.

19.

Marked for life? Effects of early cage-cleaning frequency, delivery batch, and identification tail-marking on rat anxiety profiles.

Burn CC, Deacon RM, Mason GJ.

Dev Psychobiol. 2008 Apr;50(3):266-77. doi: 10.1002/dev.20279.

PMID:
18335494
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.

The use of operant technology to measure behavioral priorities in captive animals.

Cooper JJ, Mason GJ.

Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 2001 Aug;33(3):427-34. Review.

PMID:
11591075
25.

Frustrations of fur-farmed mink.

Mason GJ, Cooper J, Clarebrough C.

Nature. 2001 Mar 1;410(6824):35-6. No abstract available.

PMID:
11242031
27.

Stereotypies and suffering.

Mason GJ.

Behav Processes. 1991 Dec;25(2-3):103-15. doi: 10.1016/0376-6357(91)90013-P.

PMID:
24923970

Supplemental Content

Loading ...
Support Center