Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Search results

Items: 1 to 50 of 205

1.

Lumos!: Electrophysiological tracking of (wizarding) world knowledge use during reading.

Troyer M, Urbach TP, Kutas M.

J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2019 Jul 11. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000737. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
31294584
2.

Spontaneous parametric down-conversion of photons at 660 nm to the terahertz and sub-terahertz frequency range.

Haase B, Kutas M, Riexinger F, Bickert P, Keil A, Molter D, Bortz M, von Freymann G.

Opt Express. 2019 Mar 4;27(5):7458-7468. doi: 10.1364/OE.27.007458.

PMID:
30876309
3.

Similar time courses for word form and meaning preactivation during sentence comprehension.

DeLong KA, Chan WH, Kutas M.

Psychophysiology. 2019 Apr;56(4):e13312. doi: 10.1111/psyp.13312. Epub 2018 Dec 11.

PMID:
30548266
4.

Uncanny valley as a window into predictive processing in the social brain.

Urgen BA, Kutas M, Saygin AP.

Neuropsychologia. 2018 Jun;114:181-185. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.04.027. Epub 2018 Apr 25.

5.

Not so secret agents: Event-related potentials to semantic roles in visual event comprehension.

Cohn N, Paczynski M, Kutas M.

Brain Cogn. 2017 Dec;119:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2017.09.001. Epub 2017 Sep 9.

6.

Projectors, associators, visual imagery, and the time course of visual processing in grapheme-color synesthesia.

Amsel BD, Kutas M, Coulson S.

Cogn Neurosci. 2017 Oct;8(4):206-223. doi: 10.1080/17588928.2017.1353492. Epub 2017 Aug 2.

7.

What is your neural function, visual narrative conjunction? Grammar, meaning, and fluency in sequential image processing.

Cohn N, Kutas M.

Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2017;2(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s41235-017-0064-5. Epub 2017 May 24.

8.

Abnormal self-schema in semantic memory in major depressive disorder: Evidence from event-related brain potentials.

Kiang M, Farzan F, Blumberger DM, Kutas M, McKinnon MC, Kansal V, Rajji TK, Daskalakis ZJ.

Biol Psychol. 2017 May;126:41-47. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2017.04.003. Epub 2017 Apr 3.

9.

When a hit sounds like a kiss: An electrophysiological exploration of semantic processing in visual narrative.

Manfredi M, Cohn N, Kutas M.

Brain Lang. 2017 Jun;169:28-38. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2017.02.001. Epub 2017 Feb 24.

10.

Hemispheric differences and similarities in comprehending more and less predictable sentences.

DeLong KA, Kutas M.

Neuropsychologia. 2016 Oct;91:380-393. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.09.004. Epub 2016 Sep 5.

11.

Elaboration over a Discourse Facilitates Retrieval in Sentence Processing.

Troyer M, Hofmeister P, Kutas M.

Front Psychol. 2016 Mar 15;7:374. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00374. eCollection 2016.

12.

Hemispheric asymmetry in event knowledge activation during incremental language comprehension: A visual half-field ERP study.

Metusalem R, Kutas M, Urbach TP, Elman JL.

Neuropsychologia. 2016 Apr;84:252-71. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.02.004. Epub 2016 Feb 12.

13.

Referential processing in the human brain: An Event-Related Potential (ERP) study.

Barkley C, Kluender R, Kutas M.

Brain Res. 2015 Dec 10;1629:143-59. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2015.09.017. Epub 2015 Oct 9.

PMID:
26456801
14.

Getting a cue before getting a clue: Event-related potentials to inference in visual narrative comprehension.

Cohn N, Kutas M.

Neuropsychologia. 2015 Oct;77:267-78. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.08.026. Epub 2015 Aug 29.

15.

Quantifiers are incrementally interpreted in context, more than less.

Urbach TP, DeLong KA, Kutas M.

J Mem Lang. 2015 Aug 1;83:79-96.

16.
17.

Metaphors are physical and abstract: ERPs to metaphorically modified nouns resemble ERPs to abstract language.

Forgács B, Bardolph MD, Amsel BD, DeLong KA, Kutas M.

Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 Feb 10;9:28. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00028. eCollection 2015.

18.

Pre-processing in sentence comprehension: Sensitivity to likely upcoming meaning and structure.

DeLong KA, Troyer M, Kutas M.

Lang Linguist Compass. 2014 Dec;8(12):631-645. Epub 2014 Dec 8.

19.

Different mechanisms for role relations versus verb-action congruence effects: evidence from ERPs in picture-sentence verification.

Knoeferle P, Urbach TP, Kutas M.

Acta Psychol (Amst). 2014 Oct;152:133-48. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.08.004. Epub 2014 Sep 16.

PMID:
25216075
20.

Regression-based estimation of ERP waveforms: II. Nonlinear effects, overlap correction, and practical considerations.

Smith NJ, Kutas M.

Psychophysiology. 2015 Feb;52(2):169-81. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12320. Epub 2014 Sep 4.

21.

Regression-based estimation of ERP waveforms: I. The rERP framework.

Smith NJ, Kutas M.

Psychophysiology. 2015 Feb;52(2):157-68. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12317. Epub 2014 Aug 21.

22.

ERP abnormalities elicited by word repetition in fragile X-associated tremor/ataxia syndrome (FXTAS) and amnestic MCI.

Yang JC, Chi L, Teichholtz S, Schneider A, Nanakul R, Nowacki R, Seritan A, Reed B, DeCarli C, Iragui VJ, Kutas M, Hagerman PJ, Hagerman RJ, Olichney JM.

Neuropsychologia. 2014 Oct;63:34-42. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.08.001. Epub 2014 Aug 9.

23.

Predictability, plausibility, and two late ERP positivities during written sentence comprehension.

DeLong KA, Quante L, Kutas M.

Neuropsychologia. 2014 Aug;61:150-62. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.06.016. Epub 2014 Jun 20.

24.

Empirically grounding grounded cognition: the case of color.

Amsel BD, Urbach TP, Kutas M.

Neuroimage. 2014 Oct 1;99:149-57. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.05.025. Epub 2014 May 17.

25.

Grammatical number agreement processing using the visual half-field paradigm: an event-related brain potential study.

Kemmer L, Coulson S, Kutas M.

Int J Psychophysiol. 2014 Feb;91(2):88-103. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2013.12.002. Epub 2013 Dec 8.

26.

The challenge of connecting the dots in the B.R.A.I.N.

Devor A, Bandettini PA, Boas DA, Bower JM, Buxton RB, Cohen LB, Dale AM, Einevoll GT, Fox PT, Franceschini MA, Friston KJ, Fujimoto JG, Geyer MA, Greenberg JH, Halgren E, Hämäläinen MS, Helmchen F, Hyman BT, Jasanoff A, Jernigan TL, Judd LL, Kim SG, Kleinfeld D, Kopell NJ, Kutas M, Kwong KK, Larkum ME, Lo EH, Magistretti PJ, Mandeville JB, Masliah E, Mitra PP, Mobley WC, Moskowitz MA, Nimmerjahn A, Reynolds JH, Rosen BR, Salzberg BM, Schaffer CB, Silva GA, So PT, Spitzer NC, Tootell RB, Van Essen DC, Vanduffel W, Vinogradov SA, Wald LL, Wang LV, Weber B, Yodh AG.

Neuron. 2013 Oct 16;80(2):270-4. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.09.008.

27.

Abnormal P600 word repetition effect in elderly persons with preclinical Alzheimer's disease.

Olichney JM, Pak J, Salmon DP, Yang JC, Gahagan T, Nowacki R, Hansen L, Galasko D, Kutas M, Iragui-Madoz VJ.

Cogn Neurosci. 2013;4(3-4):143-51. doi: 10.1080/17588928.2013.838945. Epub 2013 Oct 4.

28.

Subject/object processing asymmetries in Korean relative clauses: Evidence from ERP data.

Kwon N, Kluender R, Kutas M, Polinsky M.

Language (Baltim). 2013 Sep;89(3):537-585.

29.

Alive and grasping: stable and rapid semantic access to an object category but not object graspability.

Amsel BD, Urbach TP, Kutas M.

Neuroimage. 2013 Aug 15;77:1-13. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.03.058. Epub 2013 Apr 6.

30.

Getting it right: word learning across the hemispheres.

Borovsky A, Kutas M, Elman JL.

Neuropsychologia. 2013 Apr;51(5):825-37. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.01.027. Epub 2013 Feb 14.

31.

An electrophysiological analysis of contextual and temporal constraints on parafoveal word processing.

Barber HA, van der Meij M, Kutas M.

Psychophysiology. 2013 Jan;50(1):48-59. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2012.01489.x. Epub 2012 Nov 15.

32.

Once is Enough: N400 Indexes Semantic Integration of Novel Word Meanings from a Single Exposure in Context.

Borovsky A, Elman JL, Kutas M.

Lang Learn Dev. 2012 Jul;8(3):278-302. Epub 2012 May 18.

33.

To predict or not to predict: age-related differences in the use of sentential context.

Wlotko EW, Federmeier KD, Kutas M.

Psychol Aging. 2012 Dec;27(4):975-88. doi: 10.1037/a0029206. Epub 2012 Jul 9.

34.

Perceptual and motor attribute ratings for 559 object concepts.

Amsel BD, Urbach TP, Kutas M.

Behav Res Methods. 2012 Dec;44(4):1028-41. doi: 10.3758/s13428-012-0215-z.

35.

Generalized event knowledge activation during online sentence comprehension.

Metusalem R, Kutas M, Urbach TP, Hare M, McRae K, Elman JL.

J Mem Lang. 2012 May 1;66(4):545-567.

36.

Electrophysiological evidence for primary semantic memory functional organization deficits in schizophrenia.

Kiang M, Christensen BK, Kutas M, Zipursky RB.

Psychiatry Res. 2012 Apr 30;196(2-3):171-80. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2012.02.026. Epub 2012 Mar 27.

37.

Thinking ahead or not? Natural aging and anticipation during reading.

DeLong KA, Groppe DM, Urbach TP, Kutas M.

Brain Lang. 2012 Jun;121(3):226-39. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2012.02.006. Epub 2012 Mar 9.

38.

Rearranging the world: neural network supporting the processing of temporal connectives.

Ye Z, Kutas M, St George M, Sereno MI, Ling F, Münte TF.

Neuroimage. 2012 Feb 15;59(4):3662-7. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.11.039. Epub 2011 Nov 22.

39.

Cognitive event-related potentials: biomarkers of synaptic dysfunction across the stages of Alzheimer's disease.

Olichney JM, Yang JC, Taylor J, Kutas M.

J Alzheimers Dis. 2011;26 Suppl 3:215-28. doi: 10.3233/JAD-2011-0047.

40.

Mass univariate analysis of event-related brain potentials/fields II: Simulation studies.

Groppe DM, Urbach TP, Kutas M.

Psychophysiology. 2011 Dec;48(12):1726-37. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2011.01272.x. Epub 2011 Sep 6.

41.

Mass univariate analysis of event-related brain potentials/fields I: a critical tutorial review.

Groppe DM, Urbach TP, Kutas M.

Psychophysiology. 2011 Dec;48(12):1711-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2011.01273.x. Epub 2011 Sep 6. Review.

42.

Overlapping dual ERP responses to low cloze probability sentence continuations.

DeLong KA, Urbach TP, Groppe DM, Kutas M.

Psychophysiology. 2011 Sep;48(9):1203-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2011.01199.x. Epub 2011 Apr 1.

43.

Parafoveal perception during sentence reading? An ERP paradigm using rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) with flankers.

Barber HA, Ben-Zvi S, Bentin S, Kutas M.

Psychophysiology. 2011 Apr;48(4):523-531. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.01082.x. Epub 2010 Aug 18.

44.

Effects of event knowledge in processing verbal arguments.

Bicknell K, Elman JL, Hare M, McRae K, Kutas M.

J Mem Lang. 2010 Nov 1;63(4):489-505.

45.

The phonemic restoration effect reveals pre-N400 effect of supportive sentence context in speech perception.

Groppe DM, Choi M, Huang T, Schilz J, Topkins B, Urbach TP, Kutas M.

Brain Res. 2010 Nov 18;1361:54-66. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.09.003. Epub 2010 Sep 8.

46.

Thirty years and counting: finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP).

Kutas M, Federmeier KD.

Annu Rev Psychol. 2011;62:621-47. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.131123. Review.

47.

Age-related and individual differences in the use of prediction during language comprehension.

Federmeier KD, Kutas M, Schul R.

Brain Lang. 2010 Dec;115(3):149-61. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2010.07.006. Epub 2010 Aug 21.

48.

Comprehending how visual context influences incremental sentence processing: Insights from ERPs and picture-sentence verification.

Knoeferle P, Urbach TP, Kutas M.

Psychophysiology. 2011 Apr;48(4):495-506. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.01080.x.

49.
50.

Learning to use words: event-related potentials index single-shot contextual word learning.

Borovsky A, Kutas M, Elman J.

Cognition. 2010 Aug;116(2):289-96. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.05.004. Epub 2010 Jun 1.

Supplemental Content

Support Center