Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Search results

Items: 27

1.

Interference between overlapping memories is predicted by neural states during learning.

Chanales AJH, Dudukovic NM, Richter FR, Kuhl BA.

Nat Commun. 2019 Nov 25;10(1):5363. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-13377-x.

2.

Decoding the tradeoff between encoding and retrieval to predict memory for overlapping events.

Long NM, Kuhl BA.

Neuroimage. 2019 Nov 1;201:116001. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.07.014. Epub 2019 Jul 9.

PMID:
31299369
3.

Decomposing Parietal Memory Reactivation to Predict Consequences of Remembering.

Lee H, Samide R, Richter FR, Kuhl BA.

Cereb Cortex. 2019 Jul 22;29(8):3305-3318. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhy200.

PMID:
30137255
4.

Parietal Representations of Stimulus Features Are Amplified during Memory Retrieval and Flexibly Aligned with Top-Down Goals.

Favila SE, Samide R, Sweigart SC, Kuhl BA.

J Neurosci. 2018 Sep 5;38(36):7809-7821. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0564-18.2018. Epub 2018 Jul 27.

5.

Bottom-Up and Top-Down Factors Differentially Influence Stimulus Representations Across Large-Scale Attentional Networks.

Long NM, Kuhl BA.

J Neurosci. 2018 Mar 7;38(10):2495-2504. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2724-17.2018. Epub 2018 Feb 2.

6.

Overlap among Spatial Memories Triggers Repulsion of Hippocampal Representations.

Chanales AJH, Oza A, Favila SE, Kuhl BA.

Curr Biol. 2017 Aug 7;27(15):2307-2317.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.06.057. Epub 2017 Jul 20.

7.

Sampling memory to make profitable choices.

Kuhl BA, Long NM.

Nat Neurosci. 2017 Jun 27;20(7):903-904. doi: 10.1038/nn.4588. No abstract available.

PMID:
28653687
8.

Experience-dependent hippocampal pattern differentiation prevents interference during subsequent learning.

Favila SE, Chanales AJ, Kuhl BA.

Nat Commun. 2016 Apr 6;7:11066. doi: 10.1038/ncomms11066.

9.

Hippocampal Mismatch Signals Are Modulated by the Strength of Neural Predictions and Their Similarity to Outcomes.

Long NM, Lee H, Kuhl BA.

J Neurosci. 2016 Dec 14;36(50):12677-12687. Epub 2016 Nov 7.

10.

Reconstructing Perceived and Retrieved Faces from Activity Patterns in Lateral Parietal Cortex.

Lee H, Kuhl BA.

J Neurosci. 2016 Jun 1;36(22):6069-82. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4286-15.2016.

11.

Lower Parietal Encoding Activation Is Associated with Sharper Information and Better Memory.

Lee H, Chun MM, Kuhl BA.

Cereb Cortex. 2017 Apr 1;27(4):2486-2499. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhw097.

PMID:
27102656
12.

Predicting the integration of overlapping memories by decoding mnemonic processing states during learning.

Richter FR, Chanales AJH, Kuhl BA.

Neuroimage. 2016 Jan 1;124(Pt A):323-335. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.08.051. Epub 2015 Aug 29.

13.

Age-related differences in the neural basis of the subjective vividness of memories: evidence from multivoxel pattern classification.

Johnson MK, Kuhl BA, Mitchell KJ, Ankudowich E, Durbin KA.

Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2015 Sep;15(3):644-61. doi: 10.3758/s13415-015-0352-9.

14.

Successful remembering elicits event-specific activity patterns in lateral parietal cortex.

Kuhl BA, Chun MM.

J Neurosci. 2014 Jun 4;34(23):8051-60. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4328-13.2014.

15.

Neural portraits of perception: reconstructing face images from evoked brain activity.

Cowen AS, Chun MM, Kuhl BA.

Neuroimage. 2014 Jul 1;94:12-22. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.03.018. Epub 2014 Mar 17.

16.

Stimulating memory consolidation.

Favila SE, Kuhl BA.

Nat Neurosci. 2014 Feb;17(2):151-2. doi: 10.1038/nn.3638. No abstract available.

PMID:
24473261
17.

Dissociable neural mechanisms for goal-directed versus incidental memory reactivation.

Kuhl BA, Johnson MK, Chun MM.

J Neurosci. 2013 Oct 9;33(41):16099-109. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0207-13.2013.

18.

Repetition suppression and multi-voxel pattern similarity differentially track implicit and explicit visual memory.

Ward EJ, Chun MM, Kuhl BA.

J Neurosci. 2013 Sep 11;33(37):14749-57. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4889-12.2013.

19.

Attending to the present when remembering the past.

Kuhl BA, Chun MM.

Neuron. 2012 Sep 20;75(6):944-7. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.09.002.

20.

Neural reactivation reveals mechanisms for updating memory.

Kuhl BA, Bainbridge WA, Chun MM.

J Neurosci. 2012 Mar 7;32(10):3453-61. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5846-11.2012.

21.

Multi-voxel patterns of visual category representation during episodic encoding are predictive of subsequent memory.

Kuhl BA, Rissman J, Wagner AD.

Neuropsychologia. 2012 Mar;50(4):458-69. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.09.002. Epub 2011 Sep 8.

22.

More is not always better: paradoxical effects of repetition on semantic accessibility.

Kuhl BA, Anderson MC.

Psychon Bull Rev. 2011 Oct;18(5):964-72. doi: 10.3758/s13423-011-0110-0.

PMID:
21584852
23.

Intentional suppression of unwanted memories grows more difficult as we age.

Anderson MC, Reinholz J, Kuhl BA, Mayr U.

Psychol Aging. 2011 Jun;26(2):397-405. doi: 10.1037/a0022505.

PMID:
21443352
24.

Fidelity of neural reactivation reveals competition between memories.

Kuhl BA, Rissman J, Chun MM, Wagner AD.

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Apr 5;108(14):5903-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1016939108. Epub 2011 Mar 21.

25.

Resistance to forgetting associated with hippocampus-mediated reactivation during new learning.

Kuhl BA, Shah AT, DuBrow S, Wagner AD.

Nat Neurosci. 2010 Apr;13(4):501-6. doi: 10.1038/nn.2498. Epub 2010 Feb 28.

26.

Overcoming suppression in order to remember: contributions from anterior cingulate and ventrolateral prefrontal cortex.

Kuhl BA, Kahn I, Dudukovic NM, Wagner AD.

Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2008 Jun;8(2):211-21.

27.

Decreased demands on cognitive control reveal the neural processing benefits of forgetting.

Kuhl BA, Dudukovic NM, Kahn I, Wagner AD.

Nat Neurosci. 2007 Jul;10(7):908-14. Epub 2007 Jun 3.

PMID:
17558403

Supplemental Content

Support Center