Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Search results

Items: 1 to 50 of 162

1.

PET/CT-guided biopsy with respiratory motion correction.

Zhang R, Zukić D, Byrd DW, Enquobahrie A, Alessio AM, Cleary K, Banovac F, Kinahan PE.

Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2019 Sep 11. doi: 10.1007/s11548-019-02047-4. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
31512193
2.

Comparison of regional lung perfusion response on longitudinal MAA SPECT/CT in lung cancer patients treated with and without functional tissue-avoidance radiation therapy.

Thomas HMT, Zeng J, Lee HJ Jr, Sasidharan BK, Kinahan PE, Miyaoka RS, Vesselle HJ, Rengan R, Bowen SR.

Br J Radiol. 2019 Aug 12:20190174. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20190174. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
31364397
3.

Voxel Forecast for Precision Oncology: Predicting Spatially Variant and Multiscale Cancer Therapy Response on Longitudinal Quantitative Molecular Imaging.

Bowen SR, Hippe DS, Chaovalitwongse WA, Duan C, Thammasorn P, Liu X, Miyaoka RS, Vesselle HJ, Kinahan PE, Rengan R, Zeng J.

Clin Cancer Res. 2019 Aug 15;25(16):5027-5037. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-3908. Epub 2019 May 29.

PMID:
31142507
4.

Comparison of prediction models with radiological semantic features and radiomics in lung cancer diagnosis of the pulmonary nodules: a case-control study.

Wu W, Pierce LA, Zhang Y, Pipavath SNJ, Randolph TW, Lastwika KJ, Lampe PD, Houghton AM, Liu H, Xia L, Kinahan PE.

Eur Radiol. 2019 Nov;29(11):6100-6108. doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06213-9. Epub 2019 May 21.

PMID:
31115618
5.

Performance evaluation of the 5-Ring GE Discovery MI PET/CT system using the national electrical manufacturers association NU 2-2012 Standard.

Pan T, Einstein SA, Kappadath SC, Grogg KS, Lois Gomez C, Alessio AM, Hunter WC, El Fakhri G, Kinahan PE, Mawlawi OR.

Med Phys. 2019 Jul;46(7):3025-3033. doi: 10.1002/mp.13576. Epub 2019 May 31.

PMID:
31069816
6.

Bias in PET Images of Solid Phantoms Due to CT-Based Attenuation Correction.

Byrd DW, Sunderland JJ, Lee TC, Kinahan PE.

Tomography. 2019 Mar;5(1):154-160. doi: 10.18383/j.tom.2018.00043.

7.

The Impact of Arterial Input Function Determination Variations on Prostate Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Pharmacokinetic Modeling: A Multicenter Data Analysis Challenge, Part II.

Huang W, Chen Y, Fedorov A, Li X, Jajamovich GH, Malyarenko DI, Aryal MP, LaViolette PS, Oborski MJ, O'Sullivan F, Abramson RG, Jafari-Khouzani K, Afzal A, Tudorica A, Moloney B, Gupta SN, Besa C, Kalpathy-Cramer J, Mountz JM, Laymon CM, Muzi M, Kinahan PE, Schmainda K, Cao Y, Chenevert TL, Taouli B, Yankeelov TE, Fennessy F, Li X.

Tomography. 2019 Mar;5(1):99-109. doi: 10.18383/j.tom.2018.00027.

8.

Test-Retest Reproducibility of 18F-FDG PET/CT Uptake in Cancer Patients Within a Qualified and Calibrated Local Network.

Kurland BF, Peterson LM, Shields AT, Lee JH, Byrd DW, Novakova-Jiresova A, Muzi M, Specht JM, Mankoff DA, Linden HM, Kinahan PE.

J Nucl Med. 2019 May;60(5):608-614. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.118.209544. Epub 2018 Oct 25.

PMID:
30361381
9.

Calibration Software for Quantitative PET/CT Imaging Using Pocket Phantoms.

Zukić D, Byrd DW, Kinahan PE, Enquobahrie A.

Tomography. 2018 Sep;4(3):148-158. doi: 10.18383/j.tom.2018.00020.

10.

Simultaneous Estimation of Bias and Resolution in PET Images With a Long-Lived "Pocket" Phantom System.

Kinahan PE, Byrd DW, Helba B, Wangerin KA, Liu X, Levy JR, Allberg KC, Krishnan K, Avila RS.

Tomography. 2018 Mar;4(1):33-41. doi: 10.18383/j.tom.2018.00004.

11.

The Use of Quantitative Imaging in Radiation Oncology: A Quantitative Imaging Network (QIN) Perspective.

Press RH, Shu HG, Shim H, Mountz JM, Kurland BF, Wahl RL, Jones EF, Hylton NM, Gerstner ER, Nordstrom RJ, Henderson L, Kurdziel KA, Vikram B, Jacobs MA, Holdhoff M, Taylor E, Jaffray DA, Schwartz LH, Mankoff DA, Kinahan PE, Linden HM, Lambin P, Dilling TJ, Rubin DL, Hadjiiski L, Buatti JM.

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2018 Nov 15;102(4):1219-1235. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.06.023. Epub 2018 Jun 30. Review.

12.

Multisite Concordance of DSC-MRI Analysis for Brain Tumors: Results of a National Cancer Institute Quantitative Imaging Network Collaborative Project.

Schmainda KM, Prah MA, Rand SD, Liu Y, Logan B, Muzi M, Rane SD, Da X, Yen YF, Kalpathy-Cramer J, Chenevert TL, Hoff B, Ross B, Cao Y, Aryal MP, Erickson B, Korfiatis P, Dondlinger T, Bell L, Hu L, Kinahan PE, Quarles CC.

AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2018 Jun;39(6):1008-1016. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A5675. Epub 2018 May 24.

13.

Impact of tumour motion compensation and delineation methods on FDG PET-based dose painting plan quality for NSCLC radiation therapy.

Thomas HM, Kinahan PE, Samuel JJE, Bowen SR.

J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2018 Feb;62(1):81-90. doi: 10.1111/1754-9485.12693. Epub 2017 Nov 28.

14.

Simulation study of quantitative precision of the PET/X dedicated breast PET scanner.

Zeng C, Kinahan PE, Qian H, Harrison RL, Champley KM, MacDonald LR.

J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2017 Oct;4(4):045502. doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.4.4.045502. Epub 2017 Oct 30.

15.

Tumor radiomic heterogeneity: Multiparametric functional imaging to characterize variability and predict response following cervical cancer radiation therapy.

Bowen SR, Yuh WTC, Hippe DS, Wu W, Partridge SC, Elias S, Jia G, Huang Z, Sandison GA, Nelson D, Knopp MV, Lo SS, Kinahan PE, Mayr NA.

J Magn Reson Imaging. 2018 May;47(5):1388-1396. doi: 10.1002/jmri.25874. Epub 2017 Oct 16.

16.

Multisite concordance of apparent diffusion coefficient measurements across the NCI Quantitative Imaging Network.

Newitt DC, Malyarenko D, Chenevert TL, Quarles CC, Bell L, Fedorov A, Fennessy F, Jacobs MA, Solaiyappan M, Hectors S, Taouli B, Muzi M, Kinahan PE, Schmainda KM, Prah MA, Taber EN, Kroenke C, Huang W, Arlinghaus LR, Yankeelov TE, Cao Y, Aryal M, Yen YF, Kalpathy-Cramer J, Shukla-Dave A, Fung M, Liang J, Boss M, Hylton N.

J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2018 Jan;5(1):011003. doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.5.1.011003. Epub 2017 Oct 10.

17.

Functional lung avoidance and response-adaptive escalation (FLARE) RT: Multimodality plan dosimetry of a precision radiation oncology strategy.

Lee E, Zeng J, Miyaoka RS, Saini J, Kinahan PE, Sandison GA, Wong T, Vesselle HJ, Rengan R, Bowen SR.

Med Phys. 2017 Jul;44(7):3418-3429. doi: 10.1002/mp.12308. Epub 2017 Jun 1.

18.

Special Section Guest Editorial: Positron Emission Tomography: History, Current Status, and Future Prospects.

Pelc NJ, Kinahan PE, Pettigrew RI.

J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2017 Jan;4(1):011001. doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.4.1.011001. Epub 2017 Mar 31. No abstract available.

19.

Performance Observations of Scanner Qualification of NCI-Designated Cancer Centers: Results From the Centers of Quantitative Imaging Excellence (CQIE) Program.

Rosen M, Kinahan PE, Gimpel JF, Opanowski A, Siegel BA, Hill GC, Weiss L, Shankar L.

Acad Radiol. 2017 Feb;24(2):232-245. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2016.09.025. Epub 2016 Nov 29.

20.

Framework for radiation pneumonitis risk stratification based on anatomic and perfused lung dosimetry.

Dhami G, Zeng J, Vesselle HJ, Kinahan PE, Miyaoka RS, Patel SA, Rengan R, Bowen SR.

Strahlenther Onkol. 2017 May;193(5):410-418. doi: 10.1007/s00066-017-1114-0. Epub 2017 Mar 2.

21.

Qualification of National Cancer Institute-Designated Cancer Centers for Quantitative PET/CT Imaging in Clinical Trials.

Scheuermann JS, Reddin JS, Opanowski A, Kinahan PE, Siegel BA, Shankar LK, Karp JS.

J Nucl Med. 2017 Jul;58(7):1065-1071. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.116.186759. Epub 2017 Mar 2. Review.

22.

Direct Reconstruction of CT-based Attenuation Correction Images for PET with Cluster-Based Penalties.

Kim SM, Alessio AM, De Man B, Kinahan PE.

IEEE Trans Nucl Sci. 2017 Mar;64(3):959-968. doi: 10.1109/TNS.2017.2654680. Epub 2017 Jan 17.

23.

Multi-site quality and variability analysis of 3D FDG PET segmentations based on phantom and clinical image data.

Beichel RR, Smith BJ, Bauer C, Ulrich EJ, Ahmadvand P, Budzevich MM, Gillies RJ, Goldgof D, Grkovski M, Hamarneh G, Huang Q, Kinahan PE, Laymon CM, Mountz JM, Muzi JP, Muzi M, Nehmeh S, Oborski MJ, Tan Y, Zhao B, Sunderland JJ, Buatti JM.

Med Phys. 2017 Feb;44(2):479-496. doi: 10.1002/mp.12041.

24.

A virtual clinical trial comparing static versus dynamic PET imaging in measuring response to breast cancer therapy.

Wangerin KA, Muzi M, Peterson LM, Linden HM, Novakova A, Mankoff DA, Kinahan PE.

Phys Med Biol. 2017 May 7;62(9):3639-3655. doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/aa6023. Epub 2017 Feb 13.

25.

Comparison Between Pre-Log and Post-Log Statistical Models in Ultra-Low-Dose CT Reconstruction.

Lin Fu, Tzu-Cheng Lee, Soo Mee Kim, Alessio AM, Kinahan PE, Zhiqian Chang, Sauer K, Kalra MK, De Man B.

IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2017 Mar;36(3):707-720. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2016.2627004. Epub 2016 Nov 9.

26.

Evaluation of Cross-Calibrated 68Ge/68Ga Phantoms for Assessing PET/CT Measurement Bias in Oncology Imaging for Single- and Multicenter Trials.

Byrd DW, Doot RK, Allberg KC, MacDonald LR, McDougald WA, Elston BF, Linden HM, Kinahan PE.

Tomography. 2016 Dec;2(4):353-360. doi: 10.18383/j.tom.2016.00205.

27.

Evaluation of lesion detectability in positron emission tomography when using a convergent penalized likelihood image reconstruction method.

Wangerin KA, Ahn S, Wollenweber S, Ross SG, Kinahan PE, Manjeshwar RM.

J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2017 Jan;4(1):011002. Epub 2016 Nov 22.

28.

Evaluation of event position reconstruction in monolithic crystals that are optically coupled.

Morrocchi M, Hunter WC, Del Guerra A, Lewellen TK, Kinahan PE, MacDonald LR, Bisogni MG, Miyaoka RS.

Phys Med Biol. 2016 Dec 7;61(23):8298-8320. Epub 2016 Nov 3.

29.

Fast analytical approach of application specific dose efficient spectrum selection for diagnostic CT imaging and PET attenuation correction.

Rui X, Jin Y, FitzGerald PF, Wu M, Alessio AM, Kinahan PE, De Man B.

Phys Med Biol. 2016 Nov 7;61(21):7787-7811. Epub 2016 Oct 18.

30.

A phantom design for assessment of detectability in PET imaging.

Wollenweber SD, Alessio AM, Kinahan PE.

Med Phys. 2016 Sep;43(9):5051. doi: 10.1118/1.4960365.

PMID:
27587035
31.

Brown Adipose Reporting Criteria in Imaging STudies (BARCIST 1.0): Recommendations for Standardized FDG-PET/CT Experiments in Humans.

Chen KY, Cypess AM, Laughlin MR, Haft CR, Hu HH, Bredella MA, Enerbäck S, Kinahan PE, Lichtenbelt Wv, Lin FI, Sunderland JJ, Virtanen KA, Wahl RL.

Cell Metab. 2016 Aug 9;24(2):210-22. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2016.07.014. Review.

32.

Measuring total liver function on sulfur colloid SPECT/CT for improved risk stratification and outcome prediction of hepatocellular carcinoma patients.

Bowen SR, Chapman TR, Borgman J, Miyaoka RS, Kinahan PE, Liou IW, Sandison GA, Vesselle HJ, Nyflot MJ, Apisarnthanarax S.

EJNMMI Res. 2016 Dec;6(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s13550-016-0212-9. Epub 2016 Jun 27.

33.

Characterization of PET/CT images using texture analysis: the past, the present… any future?

Hatt M, Tixier F, Pierce L, Kinahan PE, Le Rest CC, Visvikis D.

Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017 Jan;44(1):151-165. Epub 2016 Jun 6. Review.

34.

Designing a compact high performance brain PET scanner-simulation study.

Gong K, Majewski S, Kinahan PE, Harrison RL, Elston BF, Manjeshwar R, Dolinsky S, Stolin AV, Brefczynski-Lewis JA, Qi J.

Phys Med Biol. 2016 May 21;61(10):3681-97. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/61/10/3681. Epub 2016 Apr 15.

35.

Mixed Confidence Estimation for Iterative CT Reconstruction.

Perlmutter DS, Kim SM, Kinahan PE, Alessio AM.

IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2016 Sep;35(9):2005-14. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2016.2543141. Epub 2016 Mar 17.

36.

An algorithm for automated ROI definition in water or epoxy-filled NEMA NU-2 image quality phantoms.

Pierce LA II, Byrd DW, Elston BF, Karp JS, Sunderland JJ, Kinahan PE.

J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2016 Jan 8;17(1):440–456. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v17i1.5842.

37.

Effect of 18F-FDG uptake time on lesion detectability in PET imaging of early stage breast cancer.

Wangerin KA, Muzi M, Peterson LM, Linden HM, Novakova A, O'Sullivan F, Kurland BF, Mankoff DA, Kinahan PE.

Tomography. 2015 Sep;1(1):53-60. Erratum in: Tomography. ;2(3):238.

38.

Quantitative Imaging in Cancer Clinical Trials.

Yankeelov TE, Mankoff DA, Schwartz LH, Lieberman FS, Buatti JM, Mountz JM, Erickson BJ, Fennessy FM, Huang W, Kalpathy-Cramer J, Wahl RL, Linden HM, Kinahan PE, Zhao B, Hylton NM, Gillies RJ, Clarke L, Nordstrom R, Rubin DL.

Clin Cancer Res. 2016 Jan 15;22(2):284-90. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-3336. Review.

39.

AAPM/SNMMI Joint Task Force: report on the current state of nuclear medicine physics training.

Harkness BA, Allison JD, Clements JB, Coffey CW, Fahey FH, Gress DA, Kinahan PE, Nickoloff EL, Mawlawi OR, MacDougall RD, Pizzutiello RJ.

J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2015 Sep 8;16(5):3-13. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v16i5.5661.

40.

Radiomics: Images Are More than Pictures, They Are Data.

Gillies RJ, Kinahan PE, Hricak H.

Radiology. 2016 Feb;278(2):563-77. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2015151169. Epub 2015 Nov 18.

41.

Morphology supporting function: attenuation correction for SPECT/CT, PET/CT, and PET/MR imaging.

Lee TC, Alessio AM, Miyaoka RM, Kinahan PE.

Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016 Mar;60(1):25-39. Epub 2015 Nov 17. Review.

42.

Cherenkov luminescence measurements with digital silicon photomultipliers: a feasibility study.

Ciarrocchi E, Belcari N, Guerra AD, Cherry SR, Lehnert A, Hunter WC, McDougald W, Miyaoka RS, Kinahan PE.

EJNMMI Phys. 2015 Dec;2(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s40658-015-0134-z. Epub 2015 Nov 16.

43.

Multicenter Clinical Trials Using 18F-FDG PET to Measure Early Response to Oncologic Therapy: Effects of Injection-to-Acquisition Time Variability on Required Sample Size.

Kurland BF, Muzi M, Peterson LM, Doot RK, Wangerin KA, Mankoff DA, Linden HM, Kinahan PE.

J Nucl Med. 2016 Feb;57(2):226-30. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.115.162289. Epub 2015 Oct 22.

44.

Ultra-low dose CT attenuation correction for PET/CT: analysis of sparse view data acquisition and reconstruction algorithms.

Rui X, Cheng L, Long Y, Fu L, Alessio AM, Asma E, Kinahan PE, De Man B.

Phys Med Biol. 2015 Oct 7;60(19):7437-60. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/60/19/7437. Epub 2015 Sep 9.

45.

Quantitative radiomics: impact of stochastic effects on textural feature analysis implies the need for standards.

Nyflot MJ, Yang F, Byrd D, Bowen SR, Sandison GA, Kinahan PE.

J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2015 Oct;2(4):041002. doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.2.4.041002. Epub 2015 Aug 5.

46.

Assessment of patient selection criteria for quantitative imaging with respiratory-gated positron emission tomography.

Bowen SR, Pierce LA, Alessio AM, Liu C, Wollenweber SD, Stearns CW, Kinahan PE.

J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2014 Jul;1(2):026001. doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.1.2.026001. Epub 2014 Sep 24.

47.

Comparison of prone versus supine 18F-FDG-PET of locally advanced breast cancer: Phantom and preliminary clinical studies.

Williams JM, Rani SD, Li X, Arlinghaus LR, Lee TC, MacDonald LR, Partridge SC, Kang H, Whisenant JG, Abramson RG, Linden HM, Kinahan PE, Yankeelov TE.

Med Phys. 2015 Jul;42(7):3801-13. doi: 10.1118/1.4921363.

48.

The Value of Establishing the Quantitative Accuracy of PET/CT Imaging.

Kinahan PE, Mankoff DA, Linden HM.

J Nucl Med. 2015 Aug;56(8):1133-4. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.115.159178. Epub 2015 Jun 18. No abstract available.

49.

Performance assessment of a NaI(Tl) gamma counter for PET applications with methods for improved quantitative accuracy and greater standardization.

Lodge MA, Holt DP, Kinahan PE, Wong DF, Wahl RL.

EJNMMI Phys. 2015 May;2. pii: 11. doi: 10.1186/s40658-015-0114-3.

50.

A Digital Reference Object to Analyze Calculation Accuracy of PET Standardized Uptake Value.

Pierce LA 2nd, Elston BF, Clunie DA, Nelson D, Kinahan PE.

Radiology. 2015 Nov;277(2):538-45. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2015141262. Epub 2015 May 19.

Supplemental Content

Loading ...
Support Center