Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Search results

Items: 1 to 50 of 135

1.

Treatment-related Decisional Conflict, Quality of Life, and Comorbidity in Older Adults with Cancer.

Kates JM.

Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2018 Oct-Dec;5(4):421-429. doi: 10.4103/apjon.apjon_32_18.

2.

Externalization of remote microphone signals using a structural binaural model of the head and pinna.

Kates JM, Arehart KH, Muralimanohar RK, Sommerfeldt K.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2018 May;143(5):2666. doi: 10.1121/1.5032326.

PMID:
29857749
3.

The dynamic gammawarp auditory filterbank.

Kates JM, Prabhu S.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2018 Mar;143(3):1603. doi: 10.1121/1.5027827.

PMID:
29604718
4.

Using Objective Metrics to Measure Hearing Aid Performance.

Kates JM, Arehart KH, Anderson MC, Kumar Muralimanohar R, Harvey LO Jr.

Ear Hear. 2018 Mar 16. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000574. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
29554034
5.

Author's Rebuttal to Smits et al. (2018), "Comment on 'Sensitivity of the Speech Intelligibility Index to the Assumed Dynamic Range' by Jin et al. (2017)".

Jin IK, Kates JM, Arehart KH.

J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2018 Jan 22;61(1):189-190. doi: 10.1044/2017_JSLHR-H-17-0359.

PMID:
29305596
6.

Speech quality and stable gain trade-offs in adaptive feedback cancellation for hearing aids.

Lee CH, Kates JM, Rao BD, Garudadri H.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2017 Oct;142(4):EL388. doi: 10.1121/1.5007278.

7.

Using envelope modulation to explain speech intelligibility in the presence of a single reflection.

Muralimanohar RK, Kates JM, Arehart KH.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2017 May;141(5):EL482. doi: 10.1121/1.4983630.

PMID:
28599537
8.

Sensitivity of the Speech Intelligibility Index to the Assumed Dynamic Range.

Jin IK, Kates JM, Arehart KH.

J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2017 Jun 10;60(6):1674-1680. doi: 10.1044/2017_JSLHR-H-16-0348.

PMID:
28586909
9.

Does Language Matter When Using a Graphical Method for Calculating the Speech Intelligibility Index?

Jin IK, Kates JM, Arehart KH.

J Am Acad Audiol. 2017 Feb;28(2):119-126. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.15131.

PMID:
28240979
10.

The Hearing-Aid Audio Quality Index (HAAQI).

Kates JM, Arehart KH.

IEEE/ACM Trans Audio Speech Lang Process. 2016 Feb;24(2):354-365. Epub 2015 Dec 10.

11.

Comparing the information conveyed by envelope modulation for speech intelligibility, speech quality, and music quality.

Kates JM, Arehart KH.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2015 Oct;138(4):2470-82. doi: 10.1121/1.4931899.

12.

Derivations of the band-importance function: A cross-procedure comparison.

Jin IK, Kates JM, Lee K, Arehart KH.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2015 Aug;138(2):938-41. doi: 10.1121/1.4927412.

PMID:
26328709
13.

The role of metrics in studies of hearing and cognition.

Arehart K, Kates JM, Souza P.

ENT Audiol News. 2014 Jul-Aug;23(3):92-93. No abstract available.

14.

Objective Quality and Intelligibility Prediction for Users of Assistive Listening Devices.

Falk TH, Parsa V, Santos JF, Arehart K, Hazrati O, Huber R, Kates JM, Scollie S.

IEEE Signal Process Mag. 2015 Mar;32(2):114-124.

15.

Working memory and intelligibility of hearing-aid processed speech.

Souza PE, Arehart KH, Shen J, Anderson M, Kates JM.

Front Psychol. 2015 May 7;6:526. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00526. eCollection 2015.

16.

Relationship Among Signal Fidelity, Hearing Loss, and Working Memory for Digital Noise Suppression.

Arehart K, Souza P, Kates J, Lunner T, Pedersen MS.

Ear Hear. 2015 Sep-Oct;36(5):505-16. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000173.

17.

Music preferences with hearing aids: effects of signal properties, compression settings, and listener characteristics.

Croghan NB, Arehart KH, Kates JM.

Ear Hear. 2014 Sep-Oct;35(5):e170-84. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000056.

PMID:
25010635
18.

Dynamic range for speech materials in korean, english, and mandarin: a cross-language comparison.

Jin IK, Kates JM, Arehart KH.

J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2014 Oct;57(5):2024-30. doi: 10.1044/2014_JSLHR-H-14-0002.

PMID:
24826909
19.

The effects of noise vocoding on speech quality perception.

Anderson MC, Arehart KH, Kates JM.

Hear Res. 2014 Mar;309:75-83. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2013.11.011. Epub 2013 Dec 11.

PMID:
24333929
20.

Integrating cognitive and peripheral factors in predicting hearing-aid processing effectiveness.

Kates JM, Arehart KH, Souza PE.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2013 Dec;134(6):4458. doi: 10.1121/1.4824700.

22.

Improved estimation of frequency importance functions.

Kates JM.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2013 Nov;134(5):EL459-64. doi: 10.1121/1.4826148.

PMID:
24181991
23.

The effect of different meal compositions on the oral bioavailability of treprostinil diolamine in healthy volunteers.

Lim A, Wang-Smith L, Kates J, Laurent A, Kumar P, Laliberte K.

J Clin Pharm Ther. 2013 Dec;38(6):450-5. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.12085. Epub 2013 Aug 8.

PMID:
23927483
24.

Exploring the limits of frequency lowering.

Souza PE, Arehart KH, Kates JM, Croghan NB, Gehani N.

J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2013 Oct;56(5):1349-63. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2013/12-0151). Epub 2013 Jun 19.

25.

Global health diplomacy: advancing foreign policy and global health interests.

Michaud J, Kates J.

Glob Health Sci Pract. 2013 Mar 21;1(1):24-8. doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-12-00048. eCollection 2013 Mar. Review.

26.

Working memory, age, and hearing loss: susceptibility to hearing aid distortion.

Arehart KH, Souza P, Baca R, Kates JM.

Ear Hear. 2013 May-Jun;34(3):251-60. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e318271aa5e.

27.

The effect of noise envelope modulation on quality judgments of noisy speech.

Jin IK, Kates JM, Arehart KH.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2012 Oct;132(4):EL277-83. doi: 10.1121/1.4748343.

PMID:
23039565
28.

Quality and loudness judgments for music subjected to compression limiting.

Croghan NB, Arehart KH, Kates JM.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2012 Aug;132(2):1177-88. doi: 10.1121/1.4730881.

PMID:
22894236
29.

HIV/AIDS: the state of the epidemic after 3 decades.

Kaiser Family Foundation, Kates J, Carbaugh A, Rousseau D, Jankiewicz A.

JAMA. 2012 Jul 25;308(4):330. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.8700. No abstract available.

PMID:
22820770
30.

The US Global Health Initiative: where does it stand?

Kates J, Michaud J.

Lancet. 2012 May 26;379(9830):1925-6. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60783-1. No abstract available.

PMID:
22633022
31.

Spectro-temporal envelope changes caused by temporal fine structure modification.

Kates JM.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2011 Jun;129(6):3981-90. doi: 10.1121/1.3583552.

PMID:
21682419
32.

The role of treaties, agreements, conventions, and other international instruments in global health.

Kates J, Katz R.

Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2011 Jun;25(2):455-75. doi: 10.1016/j.idc.2011.02.002.

PMID:
21628058
33.

Determining perceived sound quality in a simulated hearing aid using the international speech test signal.

Arehart KH, Kates JM, Anderson MC, Moats P.

Ear Hear. 2011 Jul-Aug;32(4):533-5. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31820c81cb.

PMID:
21325947
34.

Effects of noise, nonlinear processing, and linear filtering on perceived music quality.

Arehart KH, Kates JM, Anderson MC.

Int J Audiol. 2011 Mar;50(3):177-90. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2010.539273.

PMID:
21319935
35.

Effects of noise, nonlinear processing, and linear filtering on perceived speech quality.

Arehart KH, Kates JM, Anderson MC.

Ear Hear. 2010 Jun;31(3):420-36. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181d3d4f3.

PMID:
20440116
36.

Understanding compression: modeling the effects of dynamic-range compression in hearing aids.

Kates JM.

Int J Audiol. 2010 Jun;49(6):395-409. doi: 10.3109/14992020903426256.

PMID:
20225931
37.

Use of a telephone screener to identify a probability sample of gays, lesbians, and bisexuals.

Sell RL, Kates J, Brodie M.

J Homosex. 2007;53(4):163-71. doi: 10.1080/00918360802103407.

PMID:
18689196
38.
39.

Effects of noise and distortion on speech quality judgments in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

Arehart KH, Kates JM, Anderson MC, Harvey LO Jr.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2007 Aug;122(2):1150-64.

PMID:
17672661
40.

Anemia and polycythemia in the newborn.

Kates EH, Kates JS.

Pediatr Rev. 2007 Jan;28(1):33-4. Review. No abstract available.

PMID:
17197458
41.

HIV incidence and CDC's HIV prevention budget: an exploratory correlational analysis.

Holtgrave DR, Kates J.

Am J Prev Med. 2007 Jan;32(1):63-7. Epub 2006 Dec 20.

PMID:
17184960
42.

Global health funding: a glass half full?

Kates J, Morrison JS, Lief E.

Lancet. 2006 Jul 15;368(9531):187-8. No abstract available.

PMID:
16844473
43.

Principles of digital dynamic-range compression.

Kates JM.

Trends Amplif. 2005;9(2):45-76. Review.

44.

Coherence and the speech intelligibility index.

Kates JM, Arehart KH.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2005 Apr;117(4 Pt 1):2224-37.

PMID:
15898663
45.

Delivering HIV services to vulnerable populations: an evaluation and research agenda.

McKinney MM, Marconi KM, Cleary PD, Kates J, Young SR, O'Neill JF.

Public Health Rep. 2002 Mar-Apr;117(2):114-22.

46.

Critical policy challenges in the third decade of the HIV/AIDS epidemic.

Kates J, Sorian R, Crowley JS, Summers TA.

Am J Public Health. 2002 Jul;92(7):1060-3.

47.
48.

Room reverberation effects in hearing aid feedback cancellation.

Kates JM.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2001 Jan;109(1):367-78.

PMID:
11206165
49.

HIV: challenging the health care delivery system.

Levi J, Kates J.

Am J Public Health. 2000 Jul;90(7):1033-6.

50.

Supplemental Content

Support Center