Format

Send to

Choose Destination
eNeuro. 2018 May 17;5(2). pii: ENEURO.0426-17.2018. doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0426-17.2018. eCollection 2018 Mar-Apr.

Circadian and Brain State Modulation of Network Hyperexcitability in Alzheimer's Disease.

Author information

1
Centre for Discovery Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH8 9JZ, United Kingdom.
2
Epilepsy Division, Dept of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02214.
3
Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02214.
4
Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, 34000 France.
5
Laboratory for Proteolytic Neuroscience, RIKEN Center for Brain Science, Saitama, 351-0198 Japan.
6
OpenSource Instruments Inc, Watertown, MA 02472.

Abstract

Network hyperexcitability is a feature of Alzheimer' disease (AD) as well as numerous transgenic mouse models of AD. While hyperexcitability in AD patients and AD animal models share certain features, the mechanistic overlap remains to be established. We aimed to identify features of network hyperexcitability in AD models that can be related to epileptiform activity signatures in AD patients. We studied network hyperexcitability in mice expressing amyloid precursor protein (APP) with mutations that cause familial AD, and compared a transgenic model that overexpresses human APP (hAPP) (J20), to a knock-in model expressing APP at physiological levels (APPNL/F). We recorded continuous long-term electrocorticogram (ECoG) activity from mice, and studied modulation by circadian cycle, behavioral, and brain state. We report that while J20s exhibit frequent interictal spikes (IISs), APPNL/F mice do not. In J20 mice, IISs were most prevalent during daylight hours and the circadian modulation was associated with sleep. Further analysis of brain state revealed that IIS in J20s are associated with features of rapid eye movement (REM) sleep. We found no evidence of cholinergic changes that may contribute to IIS-circadian coupling in J20s. In contrast to J20s, intracranial recordings capturing IIS in AD patients demonstrated frequent IIS in non-REM (NREM) sleep. The salient differences in sleep-stage coupling of IIS in APP overexpressing mice and AD patients suggests that different mechanisms may underlie network hyperexcitability in mice and humans. We posit that sleep-stage coupling of IIS should be an important consideration in identifying mouse AD models that most closely recapitulate network hyperexcitability in human AD.

KEYWORDS:

Alzheimer’s disease; circadian cycle; epilepsy

PMID:
29780880
PMCID:
PMC5956746
DOI:
10.1523/ENEURO.0426-17.2018
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for HighWire Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center