Format

Send to

Choose Destination
J Palliat Med. 2019 Nov;22(11):1370-1377. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2018.0573. Epub 2019 May 15.

Regional Variation in Palliative Care Receipt in Ontario, Canada.

Author information

1
Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
2
CCO, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
3
Ontario Palliative Care Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
4
Grand River Regional Cancer Centre, Kitchener, Ontario, Canada.
5
Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
6
Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Abstract

Background: Delivery of health services in the province of Ontario is organized into 14 Local Health Integration Networks (LHINs), and further into 76 LHIN subregions, making these a natural unit of comparing the regional differences in palliative care receipt among decedents who were identified as having palliative care needs. Objective: To assess the presence and magnitude of the remaining regional variation in palliative care receipt in Ontario after accounting for demographic and socioeconomic differences between the LHIN subregions, and therefore to assess whether the standardized proportion of palliative care receipt as a performance indicator can capture potential performance-related issues. Design: A retrospective cohort study based on Ontario administrative data sources. Setting/Subjects: Ontario residents who died between April 1, 2015 and March 31, 2016 and were identified as having palliative care needs. Measurements: Date of death, diagnostic codes used for determining palliative care needs, and services receipt in last year of life were identified from multiple administrative databases. Demographic and socioeconomic information were derived from linking decedents' postal codes to Statistics Canada Census data and Ontario Marginalization Index. Results: Statistically significant variation ranging from 63% to 75% in palliative care receipt exists between Ontario subregions even after accounting for demographic and socioeconomic differences, including age, sex, rurality, income quintile, and the four dimensions of the Ontario Marginalization Index. Conclusions: Annual directly standardized proportion of palliative care receipt can be used as a performance indicator to detect regional differences in service receipt while adjusting for regional differences in the characteristics of the decedent populations. The factors to be adjusted for can be chosen based on the comparison of interest.

KEYWORDS:

administrative data; direct standardization; palliative care receipt; performance indicators; regional comparisons

PMID:
31090480
DOI:
10.1089/jpm.2018.0573

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Atypon
Loading ...
Support Center