Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Search results

Items: 26

1.

Multiple motor memories are learned to control different points on a tool.

Heald JB, Ingram JN, Flanagan JR, Wolpert DM.

Nat Hum Behav. 2018 Apr;2(4):300-311. doi: 10.1038/s41562-018-0324-5. Epub 2018 Apr 9. No abstract available.

PMID:
29736420
2.

An error-tuned model for sensorimotor learning.

Ingram JN, Sadeghi M, Flanagan JR, Wolpert DM.

PLoS Comput Biol. 2017 Dec 18;13(12):e1005883. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005883. eCollection 2017 Dec.

3.

Ageing increases reliance on sensorimotor prediction through structural and functional differences in frontostriatal circuits.

Wolpe N, Ingram JN, Tsvetanov KA, Geerligs L, Kievit RA, Henson RN, Wolpert DM; Cam-CAN, Rowe JB.

Nat Commun. 2016 Oct 3;7:13034. doi: 10.1038/ncomms13034.

4.

Enhanced crosslimb transfer of force-field learning for dynamics that are identical in extrinsic and joint-based coordinates for both limbs.

Carroll TJ, de Rugy A, Howard IS, Ingram JN, Wolpert DM.

J Neurophysiol. 2016 Jan 1;115(1):445-56. doi: 10.1152/jn.00485.2015. Epub 2015 Nov 18.

5.

Motor effort alters changes of mind in sensorimotor decision making.

Burk D, Ingram JN, Franklin DW, Shadlen MN, Wolpert DM.

PLoS One. 2014 Mar 20;9(3):e92681. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0092681. eCollection 2014.

6.

Context-dependent decay of motor memories during skill acquisition.

Ingram JN, Flanagan JR, Wolpert DM.

Curr Biol. 2013 Jun 17;23(12):1107-12. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2013.04.079. Epub 2013 May 30.

7.

Gone in 0.6 seconds: the encoding of motor memories depends on recent sensorimotor states.

Howard IS, Ingram JN, Franklin DW, Wolpert DM.

J Neurosci. 2012 Sep 12;32(37):12756-68. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5909-11.2012.

8.

A single-rate context-dependent learning process underlies rapid adaptation to familiar object dynamics.

Ingram JN, Howard IS, Flanagan JR, Wolpert DM.

PLoS Comput Biol. 2011 Sep;7(9):e1002196. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002196. Epub 2011 Sep 29.

9.

Naturalistic approaches to sensorimotor control.

Ingram JN, Wolpert DM.

Prog Brain Res. 2011;191:3-29. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-53752-2.00016-3. Review.

PMID:
21741541
10.

Separate representations of dynamics in rhythmic and discrete movements: evidence from motor learning.

Howard IS, Ingram JN, Wolpert DM.

J Neurophysiol. 2011 Apr;105(4):1722-31. doi: 10.1152/jn.00780.2010. Epub 2011 Jan 27.

11.

Deficits in sensory prediction are related to delusional ideation in healthy individuals.

Teufel C, Kingdon A, Ingram JN, Wolpert DM, Fletcher PC.

Neuropsychologia. 2010 Dec;48(14):4169-72. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.10.024. Epub 2010 Oct 23.

12.

Context-dependent partitioning of motor learning in bimanual movements.

Howard IS, Ingram JN, Wolpert DM.

J Neurophysiol. 2010 Oct;104(4):2082-91. doi: 10.1152/jn.00299.2010. Epub 2010 Aug 4.

13.

Multiple grasp-specific representations of tool dynamics mediate skillful manipulation.

Ingram JN, Howard IS, Flanagan JR, Wolpert DM.

Curr Biol. 2010 Apr 13;20(7):618-23. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2010.01.054. Epub 2010 Mar 25.

14.

Statistics of natural movements are reflected in motor errors.

Howard IS, Ingram JN, Körding KP, Wolpert DM.

J Neurophysiol. 2009 Sep;102(3):1902-10. doi: 10.1152/jn.00013.2009. Epub 2009 Jul 15.

15.

A modular planar robotic manipulandum with end-point torque control.

Howard IS, Ingram JN, Wolpert DM.

J Neurosci Methods. 2009 Jul 30;181(2):199-211. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2009.05.005. Epub 2009 May 18.

PMID:
19450621
16.

Composition and decomposition in bimanual dynamic learning.

Howard IS, Ingram JN, Wolpert DM.

J Neurosci. 2008 Oct 15;28(42):10531-40. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3473-08.2008.

17.

Mere expectation to move causes attenuation of sensory signals.

Voss M, Ingram JN, Wolpert DM, Haggard P.

PLoS One. 2008 Aug 6;3(8):e2866. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002866.

18.

The statistics of natural hand movements.

Ingram JN, Körding KP, Howard IS, Wolpert DM.

Exp Brain Res. 2008 Jun;188(2):223-36. doi: 10.1007/s00221-008-1355-3. Epub 2008 Mar 28.

19.

Simultaneous bimanual dynamics are learned without interference.

Tcheang L, Bays PM, Ingram JN, Wolpert DM.

Exp Brain Res. 2007 Oct;183(1):17-25. Epub 2007 Jul 5.

20.

Sensorimotor attenuation by central motor command signals in the absence of movement.

Voss M, Ingram JN, Haggard P, Wolpert DM.

Nat Neurosci. 2006 Jan;9(1):26-7. Epub 2005 Nov 27.

21.

A neuroeconomics approach to inferring utility functions in sensorimotor control.

Körding KP, Fukunaga I, Howard IS, Ingram JN, Wolpert DM.

PLoS Biol. 2004 Oct;2(10):e330. Epub 2004 Sep 21.

22.

Consciousness: just more of the same in the visual brain?

Ingram JN.

Trends Cogn Sci. 2002 Oct 1;6(10):412. No abstract available.

PMID:
12413570
23.

Receptive-field plasticity in human visual cortex.

Ingram JN.

Trends Cogn Sci. 2002 Aug 1;6(8):330. No abstract available.

PMID:
12140080
24.

NeuroWatch.

Ingram JN, Jones KE, Passani B, van Beers RJ.

Neuroreport. 2002 Jan 21;13(1):A19-A20. No abstract available.

PMID:
11930119
25.
26.

Cortisol in fetal fluids and the fetal adrenal at parturition in the tammar wallaby (Macropus eugenii).

Ingram JN, Shaw G, Renfree MB.

Biol Reprod. 1999 Mar;60(3):651-5.

PMID:
10026112

Supplemental Content

Loading ...
Support Center