Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Search results

Items: 32

1.

Measurement challenge: protocol for international case-control comparison of mammographic measures that predict breast cancer risk.

Dench E, Bond-Smith D, Darcey E, Lee G, Aung YK, Chan A, Cuzick J, Ding ZY, Evans CF, Harvey J, Highnam R, Hsieh MK, Kontos D, Li S, Mariapun S, Nickson C, Nguyen TL, Pertuz S, Procopio P, Rajaram N, Repich K, Tan M, Teo SH, Trinh NH, Ursin G, Wang C, Dos-Santos-Silva I, McCormack V, Nielsen M, Shepherd J, Hopper JL, Stone J.

BMJ Open. 2019 Dec 31;9(12):e031041. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031041.

2.

Technical Note: Validation of two methods to determine contact area between breast and compression paddle in mammography.

Branderhorst W, de Groot JE, van Lier MGJTB, Highnam RP, den Heeten GJ, Grimbergen CA.

Med Phys. 2017 Aug;44(8):4040-4044. doi: 10.1002/mp.12392. Epub 2017 Jul 10.

PMID:
28569996
3.

Development of a phantom to test fully automated breast density software - A work in progress.

Waade GG, Hofvind S, Thompson JD, Highnam R, Hogg P.

Radiography (Lond). 2017 Feb;23(1):e14-e19. doi: 10.1016/j.radi.2016.09.003. Epub 2016 Oct 3.

PMID:
28290354
4.

Using Volumetric Breast Density to Quantify the Potential Masking Risk of Mammographic Density.

Destounis S, Johnston L, Highnam R, Arieno A, Morgan R, Chan A.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 Jan;208(1):222-227. doi: 10.2214/AJR.16.16489. Epub 2016 Nov 8.

PMID:
27824483
5.

Oncological image analysis.

Brady SM, Highnam R, Irving B, Schnabel JA.

Med Image Anal. 2016 Oct;33:7-12. doi: 10.1016/j.media.2016.06.012. Epub 2016 Jun 23.

PMID:
27364431
6.

Impact of errors in recorded compressed breast thickness measurements on volumetric density classification using volpara v1.5.0 software.

Waade GG, Highnam R, Hauge IHR, McEntee MF, Hofvind S, Denton E, Kelly J, Sarwar JJ, Hogg P.

Med Phys. 2016 Jun;43(6):2870-2876. doi: 10.1118/1.4948503.

PMID:
27277035
7.

Mammographic compression--a need for mechanical standardization.

Branderhorst W, de Groot JE, Highnam R, Chan A, Böhm-Vélez M, Broeders MJ, den Heeten GJ, Grimbergen CA.

Eur J Radiol. 2015 Apr;84(4):596-602. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.12.012. Epub 2014 Dec 31.

PMID:
25596915
8.

Age and ethnic differences in volumetric breast density in new zealand women: a cross-sectional study.

Ellison-Loschmann L, McKenzie F, Highnam R, Cave A, Walker J, Jeffreys M.

PLoS One. 2013 Jul 31;8(7):e70217. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0070217. Print 2013.

9.

Screen-film mammographic density and breast cancer risk: a comparison of the volumetric standard mammogram form and the interactive threshold measurement methods.

Aitken Z, McCormack VA, Highnam RP, Martin L, Gunasekara A, Melnichouk O, Mawdsley G, Peressotti C, Yaffe M, Boyd NF, dos Santos Silva I.

Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2010 Feb;19(2):418-28. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-1059.

10.

Creating individual-specific biomechanical models of the breast for medical image analysis.

Rajagopal V, Lee A, Chung JH, Warren R, Highnam RP, Nash MP, Nielsen PM.

Acad Radiol. 2008 Nov;15(11):1425-36. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2008.07.017.

PMID:
18995193
11.

Mammographic density using two computer-based methods in an isoflavone trial.

Kataoka M, Atkinson C, Warren R, Sala E, Day NE, Highnam R, Warsi I, Bingham SA.

Maturitas. 2008 Apr 20;59(4):350-7. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2008.03.005. Epub 2008 May 20.

PMID:
18495387
12.

Evaluating the effectiveness of using standard mammogram form to predict breast cancer risk: case-control study.

Ding J, Warren R, Warsi I, Day N, Thompson D, Brady M, Tromans C, Highnam R, Easton D.

Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008 May;17(5):1074-81. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-2634.

13.

Does a short cessation of HRT decrease mammographic density?

Weaver K, Kataoka M, Murray J, Muir B, Anderson E, Warren R, Warsi I, Highnam R, Glasier A.

Maturitas. 2008 Apr 20;59(4):315-22. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2008.02.011. Epub 2008 Apr 29.

PMID:
18448281
14.

Breast cancer risk factors and a novel measure of volumetric breast density: cross-sectional study.

Jeffreys M, Warren R, Highnam R, Davey Smith G.

Br J Cancer. 2008 Jan 15;98(1):210-6. Epub 2007 Dec 18.

15.

Towards tracking breast cancer across medical images using subject-specific biomechanical models.

Rajagopal V, Lee A, Chung JH, Warren R, Highnam RP, Nielsen PM, Nash MP.

Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2007;10(Pt 1):651-8.

PMID:
18051114
16.

A comparison of some anthropometric parameters between an Italian and a UK population: "proof of principle" of a European project using MammoGrid.

Warren R, Thompson D, del Frate C, Cordell M, Highnam R, Tromans C, Warsi I, Ding J, Sala E, Estrella F, Solomonides AE, Odeh M, McClatchey R, Bazzocchi M, Amendolia SR, Brady M.

Clin Radiol. 2007 Nov;62(11):1052-60. Epub 2007 Jun 6.

PMID:
17920863
17.

MammoGrid--a prototype distributed mammographic database for Europe.

Warren R, Solomonides AE, del Frate C, Warsi I, Ding J, Odeh M, McClatchey R, Tromans C, Brady M, Highnam R, Cordell M, Estrella F, Bazzocchi M, Amendolia SR.

Clin Radiol. 2007 Nov;62(11):1044-51. Epub 2007 Aug 27.

PMID:
17920862
18.

Comparing measurements of breast density.

Highnam R, Jeffreys M, McCormack V, Warren R, Davey Smith G, Brady M.

Phys Med Biol. 2007 Oct 7;52(19):5881-95. Epub 2007 Sep 14.

PMID:
17881806
19.

Comparison of a new and existing method of mammographic density measurement: intramethod reliability and associations with known risk factors.

McCormack VA, Highnam R, Perry N, dos Santos Silva I.

Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2007 Jun;16(6):1148-54.

20.

Breast composition measurements using retrospective standard mammogram form (SMF).

Highnam R, Pan X, Warren R, Jeffreys M, Davey Smith G, Brady M.

Phys Med Biol. 2006 Jun 7;51(11):2695-713. Epub 2006 May 9.

PMID:
16723760
21.

Initial experiences of using an automated volumetric measure of breast density: the standard mammogram form.

Jeffreys M, Warren R, Highnam R, Smith GD.

Br J Radiol. 2006 May;79(941):378-82.

PMID:
16632617
22.

Digital mammography: a world without film?

Lloyd S, Jirotka M, Simpson AC, Highnam RP, Gavaghan DJ, Watson D, Brady JM.

Methods Inf Med. 2005;44(2):168-71.

PMID:
15924168
23.

A mammographic image analysis method to detect and measure changes in breast density.

Marias K, Behrenbruch C, Highnam R, Parbhoo S, Seifalian A, Brady M.

Eur J Radiol. 2004 Dec;52(3):276-82.

PMID:
15544906
24.

A CAD system for the 3D location of lesions in mammograms.

Kita Y, Tohno E, Highnam R, Brady M.

Med Image Anal. 2002 Sep;6(3):267-73.

PMID:
12270231
25.

A mammographic dilemma: calcification or haemosiderin as a cause of opacities? Validation of a new digital diagnostic tool.

Yam M, Tchou J, English R, Highnam R, Highnam R, Roskell D, Greenall M, Brady M.

Br J Radiol. 2001 Nov;74(887):1048-51.

PMID:
11709471
26.

Three-dimensional reconstruction of microcalcification clusters from two mammographic views.

Yam M, Brady M, Highnam R, Behrenbruch C, English R, Kita Y.

IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2001 Jun;20(6):479-89.

PMID:
11437108
27.

Detecting film-screen artifacts in mammography using a model-based approach.

Highnam R, Brady M, English R.

IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1999 Oct;18(10):1016-24.

PMID:
10628960
28.

Estimation of compressed breast thickness during mammography.

Highnam RP, Brady JM, Shepstone BJ.

Br J Radiol. 1998 Jun;71(846):646-53.

PMID:
9849389
29.

Mammographic image analysis.

Highnam RP, Brady JM, Shepstone BJ.

Eur J Radiol. 1997 Jan;24(1):20-32.

PMID:
9056146
30.

Dual compression mammography using computed radiography.

Highnam RP, Brady JM, Shepstone BJ.

Br J Radiol. 1996 Apr;69(820):373-4. No abstract available.

PMID:
8665144
31.

A representation for mammographic image processing.

Highnam R, Brady M, Shepstone B.

Med Image Anal. 1996 Mar;1(1):1-18.

PMID:
9873918
32.

Computing the scatter component of mammographic images.

Highnam RP, Brady JM, Shepstone BJ.

IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1994;13(2):301-13.

PMID:
18218506

Supplemental Content

Loading ...
Support Center