Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Search results

Items: 30

1.

The Mind-Evolution Problem: The Difficulty of Fitting Consciousness in an Evolutionary Framework.

Gutfreund Y.

Front Psychol. 2018 Aug 24;9:1537. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01537. eCollection 2018. No abstract available.

2.

Behavioral Evidence and Neural Correlates of Perceptual Grouping by Motion in the Barn Owl.

Zahar Y, Lev-Ari T, Wagner H, Gutfreund Y.

J Neurosci. 2018 Jul 25;38(30):6653-6664. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0174-18.2018. Epub 2018 Jul 2.

PMID:
29967005
3.

Interactions between top-down and bottom-up attention in barn owls (Tyto alba).

Lev-Ari T, Gutfreund Y.

Anim Cogn. 2018 Mar;21(2):197-205. doi: 10.1007/s10071-017-1150-2. Epub 2017 Dec 6.

PMID:
29214438
4.

From biokinematics to a robotic active vision system.

Barzilay O, Zelnik-Manor L, Gutfreund Y, Wagner H, Wolf A.

Bioinspir Biomim. 2017 Sep 21;12(5):056004. doi: 10.1088/1748-3190/aa7728.

PMID:
28581436
5.

The Neuroethological Paradox of Animal Consciousness.

Gutfreund Y.

Trends Neurosci. 2017 Apr;40(4):196-199. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2017.02.001. Epub 2017 Mar 6.

PMID:
28274488
6.

Stimulus-specific adaptation to visual but not auditory motion direction in the barn owl's optic tectum.

Wasmuht DF, Pena JL, Gutfreund Y.

Eur J Neurosci. 2017 Feb;45(4):610-621. doi: 10.1111/ejn.13505. Epub 2017 Jan 17.

7.

Responses to Pop-Out Stimuli in the Barn Owl's Optic Tectum Can Emerge through Stimulus-Specific Adaptation.

Dutta A, Wagner H, Gutfreund Y.

J Neurosci. 2016 Apr 27;36(17):4876-87. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3339-15.2016.

8.

Visual-auditory integration for visual search: a behavioral study in barn owls.

Hazan Y, Kra Y, Yarin I, Wagner H, Gutfreund Y.

Front Integr Neurosci. 2015 Feb 13;9:11. doi: 10.3389/fnint.2015.00011. eCollection 2015.

9.

Coding space-time stimulus dynamics in auditory brain maps.

Wang Y, Gutfreund Y, Peña JL.

Front Physiol. 2014 Apr 8;5:135. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2014.00135. eCollection 2014. Review.

10.

New perspectives on the owl's map of auditory space.

Pena JL, Gutfreund Y.

Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2014 Feb;24(1):55-62. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2013.08.008. Epub 2013 Sep 12. Review.

11.

Saliency mapping in the optic tectum and its relationship to habituation.

Dutta A, Gutfreund Y.

Front Integr Neurosci. 2014 Jan 16;8:1. doi: 10.3389/fnint.2014.00001. eCollection 2014. Review.

12.

Ongoing activity in the optic tectum is correlated on a trial-by-trial basis with the pupil dilation response.

Netser S, Dutta A, Gutfreund Y.

J Neurophysiol. 2014 Mar;111(5):918-29. doi: 10.1152/jn.00527.2013. Epub 2013 Dec 4.

13.

The representation of sound localization cues in the barn owl's inferior colliculus.

Singheiser M, Gutfreund Y, Wagner H.

Front Neural Circuits. 2012 Jul 11;6:45. doi: 10.3389/fncir.2012.00045. eCollection 2012.

14.

Responses of tectal neurons to contrasting stimuli: an electrophysiological study in the barn owl.

Zahar Y, Wagner H, Gutfreund Y.

PLoS One. 2012;7(6):e39559. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0039559. Epub 2012 Jun 20.

15.

Stimulus-specific adaptation, habituation and change detection in the gaze control system.

Gutfreund Y.

Biol Cybern. 2012 Dec;106(11-12):657-68. doi: 10.1007/s00422-012-0497-3. Epub 2012 Jun 19. Review.

PMID:
22711216
16.

Stimulus-specific adaptation: can it be a neural correlate of behavioral habituation?

Netser S, Zahar Y, Gutfreund Y.

J Neurosci. 2011 Dec 7;31(49):17811-20. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4790-11.2011.

17.

Early life exposure to noise alters the representation of auditory localization cues in the auditory space map of the barn owl.

Efrati A, Gutfreund Y.

J Neurophysiol. 2011 May;105(5):2522-35. doi: 10.1152/jn.00078.2011. Epub 2011 Mar 2.

18.

Interactions between stimulus-specific adaptation and visual auditory integration in the forebrain of the barn owl.

Reches A, Netser S, Gutfreund Y.

J Neurosci. 2010 May 19;30(20):6991-8. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5723-09.2010.

19.

Multiple manifestations of microstimulation in the optic tectum: eye movements, pupil dilations, and sensory priming.

Netser S, Ohayon S, Gutfreund Y.

J Neurophysiol. 2010 Jul;104(1):108-18. doi: 10.1152/jn.01142.2009. Epub 2010 Apr 28.

20.

Auditory and multisensory responses in the tectofugal pathway of the barn owl.

Reches A, Gutfreund Y.

J Neurosci. 2009 Jul 29;29(30):9602-13. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6117-08.2009.

21.

Multisensory enhancement in the optic tectum of the barn owl: spike count and spike timing.

Zahar Y, Reches A, Gutfreund Y.

J Neurophysiol. 2009 May;101(5):2380-94. doi: 10.1152/jn.91193.2008. Epub 2009 Mar 4.

22.

Stimulus-specific adaptations in the gaze control system of the barn owl.

Reches A, Gutfreund Y.

J Neurosci. 2008 Feb 6;28(6):1523-33. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3785-07.2008.

23.

Patterns of motor activity in the isolated nerve cord of the octopus arm.

Gutfreund Y, Matzner H, Flash T, Hochner B.

Biol Bull. 2006 Dec;211(3):212-22.

PMID:
17179381
24.

Adaptation in the auditory space map of the barn owl.

Gutfreund Y, Knudsen EI.

J Neurophysiol. 2006 Aug;96(2):813-25. Epub 2006 May 17.

25.

Gated visual input to the central auditory system.

Gutfreund Y, Zheng W, Knudsen EI.

Science. 2002 Aug 30;297(5586):1556-9.

26.

Control of octopus arm extension by a peripheral motor program.

Sumbre G, Gutfreund Y, Fiorito G, Flash T, Hochner B.

Science. 2001 Sep 7;293(5536):1845-8.

27.

Neuromuscular system of the flexible arm of the octopus: physiological characterization.

Matzner H, Gutfreund Y, Hochner B.

J Neurophysiol. 2000 Mar;83(3):1315-28.

28.

Patterns of arm muscle activation involved in octopus reaching movements.

Gutfreund Y, Flash T, Fiorito G, Hochner B.

J Neurosci. 1998 Aug 1;18(15):5976-87.

29.

Organization of octopus arm movements: a model system for studying the control of flexible arms.

Gutfreund Y, Flash T, Yarom Y, Fiorito G, Segev I, Hochner B.

J Neurosci. 1996 Nov 15;16(22):7297-307.

30.

Supplemental Content

Loading ...
Support Center