Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Search results

Items: 17

1.

Insensitivity of place cells to the value of spatial goals in a two-choice flexible navigation task.

Duvelle É, Grieves RM, Hok V, Poucet B, Arleo A, Jeffery K, Save E.

J Neurosci. 2019 Jan 29. pii: 1578-18. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1578-18.2018. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
30696727
2.

Lesions of the Head Direction Cell System Increase Hippocampal Place Field Repetition.

Harland B, Grieves RM, Bett D, Stentiford R, Wood ER, Dudchenko PA.

Curr Biol. 2017 Sep 11;27(17):2706-2712.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.07.071. Epub 2017 Aug 31.

3.

Field repetition and local mapping in the hippocampus and the medial entorhinal cortex.

Grieves RM, Duvelle É, Wood ER, Dudchenko PA.

J Neurophysiol. 2017 Oct 1;118(4):2378-2388. doi: 10.1152/jn.00933.2016. Epub 2017 Aug 16. Review.

4.

The Yin and Yang of Memory Consolidation: Hippocampal and Neocortical.

Genzel L, Rossato JI, Jacobse J, Grieves RM, Spooner PA, Battaglia FP, Fernández G, Morris RG.

PLoS Biol. 2017 Jan 13;15(1):e2000531. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2000531. eCollection 2017 Jan.

5.

The representation of space in the brain.

Grieves RM, Jeffery KJ.

Behav Processes. 2017 Feb;135:113-131. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2016.12.012. Epub 2016 Dec 26. Review.

PMID:
28034697
6.

Place cells on a maze encode routes rather than destinations.

Grieves RM, Wood ER, Dudchenko PA.

Elife. 2016 Jun 10;5. pii: e15986. doi: 10.7554/eLife.15986.

7.

Place field repetition and spatial learning in a multicompartment environment.

Grieves RM, Jenkins BW, Harland BC, Wood ER, Dudchenko PA.

Hippocampus. 2016 Jan;26(1):118-34. doi: 10.1002/hipo.22496. Epub 2015 Aug 11.

8.

Think local, act global: how do fragmented representations of space allow seamless navigation?

Dudchenko PA, Wood ER, Grieves RM.

Behav Brain Sci. 2013 Oct;36(5):548-9; discussion 571-87.

PMID:
24103601
9.

Foam separation of Pseudomonas fluorescens and Bacillus subtilis var. niger.

Grieves RB, Wang SL.

Appl Microbiol. 1967 Jan;15(1):76-81.

10.

Variables affecting the foam separation of Escherichia coli.

Bretz HW, Wang SL, Grieves RB.

Appl Microbiol. 1966 Sep;14(5):778-83.

11.

Foam fractionation of phenol.

Grieves RB, Aronica RC.

Nature. 1966 May 28;210(5039):901-3. No abstract available.

PMID:
5960319
12.

Foam separation of phenol with a cationic surfactant.

Grieves RB, Aronica RC.

Air Water Pollut. 1966 Jan;10(1):31-40. No abstract available.

PMID:
5903374
13.

A LABORATORY STUDY OF THE EFFECT OF SHORT-CIRCUITING UPON THE COMPLETELY-MIXED ACTIVATED SLUDGE PROCESS.

MILBURY WF, PIPES WO, GRIEVES RB.

Air Water Pollut. 1965 Feb;9:41-53. No abstract available.

PMID:
14277898
14.

FOAM SEPARATION OF ABS AND OTHER SURFACTANTS.

GRIEVES RB, CRANDALL CJ, WOOD RK.

Air Water Pollut. 1964 Sep;8:501-13. No abstract available.

PMID:
14215807
15.

THE EFFECT OF SHORT-CIRCUITING UPON THE COMPLETELY-MIXED ACTIVATED SLUDGE PROCESS.

GRIEVES RB, MILBURY WF, PIPES WO.

Air Water Pollut. 1964 Mar-Apr;8:199-214. No abstract available.

PMID:
14127861
16.

EFFECT OF THE FOAM-LIQUID SOLUTION INTERFACE ON CONTINUOUS FOAM SEPARATION.

GRIEVES RB, WOOD RK.

Nature. 1963 Oct 26;200:332-5. No abstract available.

PMID:
14087880
17.

CHEMICAL ALTERATION OF URINE.

GRIEVES RB, QUON JE.

Nature. 1963 Jul 13;199:114-7. No abstract available.

PMID:
14043176

Supplemental Content

Loading ...
Support Center