Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Search results

Items: 39

1.

Lack of Automatic Vocal Response Learning While Reading Aloud.

Kühnel A, Gaschler R, Frensch PA, Cohen A, Wenke D.

Exp Psychol. 2019 Jul;66(4):266-280. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000451.

PMID:
31530246
2.

Sequence Knowledge on When and What Supports Dual-Tasking.

Zhao F, Gaschler R, Schneider L, Thomaschke R, Röttger E, Haider H.

J Cogn. 2019 Jul 19;2(1):18. doi: 10.5334/joc.76.

3.

Texts and pictures serve different functions in conjoint mental model construction and adaptation.

Zhao F, Schnotz W, Wagner I, Gaschler R.

Mem Cognit. 2019 Aug 1. doi: 10.3758/s13421-019-00962-0. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
31372846
4.

More Than Hitting the Correct Key Quickly.

Gaschler R, Zhao F, Röttger E, Panzer S, Haider H.

Exp Psychol. 2019 May;66(3):207-220. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000446.

PMID:
31266432
5.

Incidental covariation learning leading to strategy change.

Gaschler R, Schuck NW, Reverberi C, Frensch PA, Wenke D.

PLoS One. 2019 Jan 24;14(1):e0210597. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210597. eCollection 2019.

6.

Differential effects of cue-based and sequence knowledge-based predictability on multitasking performance.

Gaschler R, Kemper M, Zhao F, Pumpe I, Ruderisch CB, Röttger E, Haider H.

Acta Psychol (Amst). 2018 Nov;191:76-86. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.09.004. Epub 2018 Sep 15.

PMID:
30227313
7.

Why Prediction Matters in Multitasking and How Predictability Can Improve It.

Broeker L, Kiesel A, Aufschnaiter S, Ewolds HE, Gaschler R, Haider H, Künzell S, Raab M, Röttger E, Thomaschke R, Zhao F.

Front Psychol. 2017 Nov 22;8:2021. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02021. eCollection 2017. No abstract available.

8.

Salience network dynamics underlying successful resistance of temptation.

Steimke R, Nomi JS, Calhoun VD, Stelzel C, Paschke LM, Gaschler R, Goschke T, Walter H, Uddin LQ.

Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2017 Dec 1;12(12):1928-1939. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsx123.

9.

Implicit sequence learning despite multitasking: the role of across-task predictability.

Röttger E, Haider H, Zhao F, Gaschler R.

Psychol Res. 2019 Apr;83(3):526-543. doi: 10.1007/s00426-017-0920-4. Epub 2017 Sep 26.

PMID:
28951973
10.

Challenging Cognitive Control by Mirrored Stimuli in Working Memory Matching.

Wirth M, Gaschler R.

Front Psychol. 2017 Apr 28;8:653. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00653. eCollection 2017.

11.

Self-Generated or Cue-Induced-Different Kinds of Expectations to Be Considered.

Kemper M, Gaschler R.

Front Psychol. 2017 Jan 24;8:53. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00053. eCollection 2017. No abstract available.

12.

Tied to expectations: Predicting features speeds processing even under adverse circumstances.

Schwager S, Gaschler R, Rünger D, Frensch PA.

Mem Cognit. 2017 May;45(4):611-624. doi: 10.3758/s13421-016-0683-y.

PMID:
28000115
13.

Decomposing Self-Control: Individual Differences in Goal Pursuit Despite Interfering Aversion, Temptation, and Distraction.

Steimke R, Stelzel C, Gaschler R, Rothkirch M, Ludwig VU, Paschke LM, Trempler I, Kathmann N, Goschke T, Walter H.

Front Psychol. 2016 Apr 18;7:382. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00382. eCollection 2016.

14.

The benefit of expecting no conflict--Stronger influence of self-generated than cue-induced conflict expectations on Stroop performance.

Kemper M, Gaschler R, Schwager S, Schubert T.

Acta Psychol (Amst). 2016 Jan;163:135-41. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2015.11.008. Epub 2015 Nov 30.

PMID:
26649453
15.

Fostering Formal Commutativity Knowledge with Approximate Arithmetic.

Hansen SM, Haider H, Eichler A, Godau C, Frensch PA, Gaschler R.

PLoS One. 2015 Nov 11;10(11):e0142551. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0142551. eCollection 2015.

16.

Learning to explore the structure of kinematic objects in a virtual environment.

Buckmann M, Gaschler R, Höfer S, Loeben D, Frensch PA, Brock O.

Front Psychol. 2015 Apr 7;6:374. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00374. eCollection 2015.

17.

Medial prefrontal cortex predicts internally driven strategy shifts.

Schuck NW, Gaschler R, Wenke D, Heinzle J, Frensch PA, Haynes JD, Reverberi C.

Neuron. 2015 Apr 8;86(1):331-40. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.03.015. Epub 2015 Mar 26.

18.

Motivation by potential gains and losses affects control processes via different mechanisms in the attentional network.

Paschke LM, Walter H, Steimke R, Ludwig VU, Gaschler R, Schubert T, Stelzel C.

Neuroimage. 2015 May 1;111:549-61. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.02.047. Epub 2015 Feb 27.

PMID:
25731995
19.

Transferring control demands across incidental learning tasks - stronger sequence usage in serial reaction task after shortcut option in letter string checking.

Gaschler R, Marewski JN, Wenke D, Frensch PA.

Front Psychol. 2014 Nov 28;5:1388. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01388. eCollection 2014.

20.

Once and for all--how people change strategy to ignore irrelevant information in visual tasks.

Gaschler R, Marewski JN, Frensch PA.

Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2015;68(3):543-67. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2014.961933. Epub 2014 Oct 6.

PMID:
25203902
21.

Playing off the curve - testing quantitative predictions of skill acquisition theories in development of chess performance.

Gaschler R, Progscha J, Smallbone K, Ram N, Bilalić M.

Front Psychol. 2014 Aug 22;5:923. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00923. eCollection 2014.

22.

Teachers' expertise in feedback application adapted to the phases of the learning process.

Christophel E, Gaschler R, Schnotz W.

Front Psychol. 2014 Aug 5;5:858. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00858. eCollection 2014. No abstract available.

23.

Why should working memory be related to incidentally learned sequence structures?

Martini M, Sachse P, Furtner MR, Gaschler R.

Cortex. 2015 Mar;64:407-10. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2014.05.016. Epub 2014 Jul 9. No abstract available.

PMID:
25113155
24.

Expectation mismatch: differences between self-generated and cue-induced expectations.

Gaschler R, Schwager S, Umbach VJ, Frensch PA, Schubert T.

Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2014 Oct;46 Pt 1:139-57. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.06.009. Epub 2014 Jun 24. Review.

PMID:
24971824
25.

Spontaneously spotting and applying shortcuts in arithmetic-a primary school perspective on expertise.

Godau C, Haider H, Hansen S, Schubert T, Frensch PA, Gaschler R.

Front Psychol. 2014 Jun 10;5:556. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00556. eCollection 2014.

26.

Spontaneous usage of different shortcuts based on the commutativity principle.

Gaschler R, Vaterrodt B, Frensch PA, Eichler A, Haider H.

PLoS One. 2013 Sep 23;8(9):e74972. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0074972. eCollection 2013.

27.

Get out of here, quick! Problems with transparent labels on glass doors.

Boldt A, Stürmer B, Gaschler R, Schacht A, Sommer W.

J Exp Psychol Appl. 2013 Sep;19(3):241-53. doi: 10.1037/a0034079. Epub 2013 Aug 12.

PMID:
23937152
28.

Instructed task demands and utilization of action effect anticipation.

Gaschler R, Nattkemper D.

Front Psychol. 2012 Dec 28;3:578. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00578. eCollection 2012.

29.

What I Say is What I Get: Stronger Effects of Self-Generated vs. Cue-Induced Expectations in Event-Related Potentials.

Kemper M, Umbach VJ, Schwager S, Gaschler R, Frensch PA, Stürmer B.

Front Psychol. 2012 Dec 14;3:562. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00562. eCollection 2012.

30.

Does explicit expectation really affect preparation?

Umbach VJ, Schwager S, Frensch PA, Gaschler R.

Front Psychol. 2012 Oct 1;3:378. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00378. eCollection 2012.

31.

Data-driven sequence learning or search: What are the prerequisites for the generation of explicit sequence knowledge?

Schwager S, Rünger D, Gaschler R, Frensch PA.

Adv Cogn Psychol. 2012;8(2):132-43. doi: 10.2478/v10053-008-0110-4. Epub 2012 May 21.

32.

Implicit learning of what comes when and where within a sequence: The time-course of acquiring serial position-item and item-item associations to represent serial order.

Schuck NW, Gaschler R, Frensch PA.

Adv Cogn Psychol. 2012;8(2):83-97. doi: 10.2478/v10053-008-0106-0. Epub 2012 May 21.

33.

Implicit sequence learning based on instructed task set.

Gaschler R, Frensch PA, Cohen A, Wenke D.

J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2012 Sep;38(5):1389-407. doi: 10.1037/a0028071. Epub 2012 Apr 30.

PMID:
22545612
34.

3D optical coherence tomography of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia--early experience and some pitfalls.

Gallwas J, Gaschler R, Stepp H, Friese K, Dannecker C.

Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2012;33(1):37-41.

PMID:
22439403
35.

Validation of an ex vivo human cervical tissue model for optical imaging studies.

Gallwas J, Mortensen U, Gaschler R, Ochsenkuehn R, Stepp H, Friese K, Dannecker C.

Lasers Surg Med. 2012 Mar;44(3):245-8. doi: 10.1002/lsm.22001. Epub 2012 Jan 13.

PMID:
22246999
36.

Diagnostic efficacy of backscattering intensity measurements in optical coherence tomography of cervical intraepithelial dysplasia.

Gallwas J, Mortensen U, Gaschler R, Stepp H, Ditsch N, Friese K, Dannecker C.

Lasers Surg Med. 2012 Jan;44(1):11-9. doi: 10.1002/lsm.21146. Epub 2012 Jan 3. Erratum in: Lasers Surg Med. 2012 Sep;44(7):598. Ditsch, Nina [added].

PMID:
22246983
37.

Position-item associations play a role in the acquisition of order knowledge in an implicit serial reaction time task.

Schuck NW, Gaschler R, Keisler A, Frensch PA.

J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2012 Mar;38(2):440-56. doi: 10.1037/a0025816. Epub 2011 Oct 10.

PMID:
21988408
38.

Strategic influences on implementing instructions for future actions.

Wenke D, Gaschler R, Nattkemper D, Frensch PA.

Psychol Res. 2009 Jul;73(4):587-601. doi: 10.1007/s00426-009-0239-x. Epub 2009 Apr 10.

39.

Instruction-induced feature binding.

Wenke D, Gaschler R, Nattkemper D.

Psychol Res. 2007 Jan;71(1):92-106. Epub 2005 Dec 10.

PMID:
16341902

Supplemental Content

Loading ...
Support Center