Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Search results

Items: 1 to 50 of 57

1.

Data-driven spatial filtering for improved measurement of cortical tracking of multiple representations of speech.

Lesenfants D, Vanthornhout J, Verschueren E, Francart T.

J Neural Eng. 2019 Aug 19. doi: 10.1088/1741-2552/ab3c92. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
31426053
2.

The effect of stimulus envelope shape on the auditory steady-state response.

Van Canneyt J, Hofmann M, Wouters J, Francart T.

Hear Res. 2019 Sep 1;380:22-34. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2019.05.007. Epub 2019 May 28.

PMID:
31170624
3.

Predicting individual speech intelligibility from the cortical tracking of acoustic- and phonetic-level speech representations.

Lesenfants D, Vanthornhout J, Verschueren E, Decruy L, Francart T.

Hear Res. 2019 Sep 1;380:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2019.05.006. Epub 2019 May 28.

PMID:
31167150
4.

Evidence for enhanced neural tracking of the speech envelope underlying age-related speech-in-noise difficulties.

Decruy L, Vanthornhout J, Francart T.

J Neurophysiol. 2019 Aug 1;122(2):601-615. doi: 10.1152/jn.00687.2018. Epub 2019 May 29.

PMID:
31141449
5.

Neural envelope tracking as a measure of speech understanding in cochlear implant users.

Verschueren E, Somers B, Francart T.

Hear Res. 2019 Mar 1;373:23-31. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2018.12.004. Epub 2018 Dec 14.

PMID:
30580236
6.

A preliminary investigation into hearing aid fitting based on automated real-ear measurements integrated in the fitting software: test-retest reliability, matching accuracy and perceptual outcomes.

Denys S, Latzel M, Francart T, Wouters J.

Int J Audiol. 2019 Mar;58(3):132-140. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2018.1543958. Epub 2018 Dec 4.

PMID:
30513024
7.

Neural tracking of the speech envelope in cochlear implant users.

Somers B, Verschueren E, Francart T.

J Neural Eng. 2019 Feb;16(1):016003. doi: 10.1088/1741-2552/aae6b9. Epub 2018 Nov 16.

PMID:
30444216
8.

The effect of presentation level on spectrotemporal modulation detection.

Magits S, Moncada-Torres A, Van Deun L, Wouters J, van Wieringen A, Francart T.

Hear Res. 2019 Jan;371:11-18. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2018.10.017. Epub 2018 Nov 2.

PMID:
30439570
9.

Objective Binaural Loudness Balancing Based on 40-Hz Auditory Steady-State Responses. Part II: Asymmetric and Bimodal Hearing.

Van Eeckhoutte M, Spirrov D, Wouters J, Francart T.

Trends Hear. 2018 Jan-Dec;22:2331216518805363. doi: 10.1177/2331216518805363.

10.

Objective Binaural Loudness Balancing Based on 40-Hz Auditory Steady-State Responses. Part I: Normal Hearing.

Van Eeckhoutte M, Wouters J, Francart T.

Trends Hear. 2018 Jan-Dec;22:2331216518805352. doi: 10.1177/2331216518805352.

11.

Redundant Information Is Sometimes More Beneficial Than Spatial Information to Understand Speech in Noise.

Dieudonné B, Francart T.

Ear Hear. 2019 May/Jun;40(3):545-554. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000660.

PMID:
30299342
12.

The Self-Assessed Békesy Procedure: Validation of a Method to Measure Intelligibility of Connected Discourse.

Decruy L, Das N, Verschueren E, Francart T.

Trends Hear. 2018 Jan-Dec;22:2331216518802702. doi: 10.1177/2331216518802702.

13.

Interaural Time Difference Perception with a Cochlear Implant and a Normal Ear.

Francart T, Wiebe K, Wesarg T.

J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2018 Dec;19(6):703-715. doi: 10.1007/s10162-018-00697-w. Epub 2018 Sep 27.

PMID:
30264229
14.

EEG-based auditory attention detection: boundary conditions for background noise and speaker positions.

Das N, Bertrand A, Francart T.

J Neural Eng. 2018 Dec;15(6):066017. doi: 10.1088/1741-2552/aae0a6. Epub 2018 Sep 12.

PMID:
30207293
15.

A framework for computational modelling of interaural time difference discrimination of normal and hearing-impaired listeners.

Moncada-Torres A, Joshi SN, Prokopiou A, Wouters J, Epp B, Francart T.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2018 Aug;144(2):940. doi: 10.1121/1.5051322.

PMID:
30180705
16.

Comparison between adaptive and adjustment procedures for binaural loudness balancing.

Van Eeckhoutte M, Spirrov D, Francart T.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2018 Jun;143(6):3720. doi: 10.1121/1.5042522.

PMID:
29960470
17.

Real-time loudness normalisation with combined cochlear implant and hearing aid stimulation.

Spirrov D, Van Eeckhoutte M, Van Deun L, Francart T.

PLoS One. 2018 Apr 4;13(4):e0195412. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195412. eCollection 2018.

18.

Head shadow enhancement with low-frequency beamforming improves sound localization and speech perception for simulated bimodal listeners.

Dieudonné B, Francart T.

Hear Res. 2018 Jun;363:78-84. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2018.03.007. Epub 2018 Mar 12.

PMID:
29555110
19.

Speech Intelligibility Predicted from Neural Entrainment of the Speech Envelope.

Vanthornhout J, Decruy L, Wouters J, Simon JZ, Francart T.

J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2018 Apr;19(2):181-191. doi: 10.1007/s10162-018-0654-z. Epub 2018 Feb 20.

20.

A generic EEG artifact removal algorithm based on the multi-channel Wiener filter.

Somers B, Francart T, Bertrand A.

J Neural Eng. 2018 Jun;15(3):036007. doi: 10.1088/1741-2552/aaac92. Epub 2018 Feb 2.

PMID:
29393057
21.

Electrically-evoked auditory steady-state responses as neural correlates of loudness growth in cochlear implant users.

Van Eeckhoutte M, Wouters J, Francart T.

Hear Res. 2017 Dec 8. pii: S0378-5955(17)30426-4. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2017.12.002. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
29274947
22.

Optimal gain control step sizes for bimodal stimulation.

Spirrov D, van Dijk B, Francart T.

Int J Audiol. 2018 Mar;57(3):184-193. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2017.1403655. Epub 2017 Nov 24.

PMID:
29172895
23.

Stability of Auditory Steady State Responses Over Time.

Van Eeckhoutte M, Luke R, Wouters J, Francart T.

Ear Hear. 2018 Mar/Apr;39(2):260-268. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000483.

PMID:
28857787
24.

Desynchronisation of auditory steady-state responses related to changes in interaural phase differences: an objective measure of binaural hearing.

Vercammen C, van Wieringen A, Wouters J, Francart T.

Int J Audiol. 2017 Jul;56(7):464-471. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2017.1288304. Epub 2017 Feb 14.

PMID:
28635497
25.

Functional modelling of interaural time difference discrimination in acoustical and electrical hearing.

Prokopiou A, Moncada-Torres A, Wouters J, Francart T.

J Neural Eng. 2017 Aug;14(4):046021. doi: 10.1088/1741-2552/aa7075.

PMID:
28462911
26.

Adaptive attention-driven speech enhancement for EEG-informed hearing prostheses.

Das N, Van Eyndhoven S, Francart T, Bertrand A.

Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2016 Aug;2016:77-80. doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2016.7590644.

PMID:
28268285
27.

Predicting phoneme and word recognition in noise using a computational model of the auditory periphery.

Moncada-Torres A, van Wieringen A, Bruce IC, Wouters J, Francart T.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2017 Jan;141(1):300. doi: 10.1121/1.4973569.

PMID:
28147586
28.

APEX/SPIN: a free test platform to measure speech intelligibility.

Francart T, Hofmann M, Vanthornhout J, Van Deun L, van Wieringen A, Wouters J.

Int J Audiol. 2017 Feb;56(2):137-143. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2016.1247215. Epub 2016 Oct 31.

PMID:
27796135
29.

Fitting prelingually deafened adult cochlear implant users based on electrode discrimination performance.

Debruyne JA, Francart T, Janssen AM, Douma K, Brokx JP.

Int J Audiol. 2017 Mar;56(3):174-185. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2016.1243262. Epub 2016 Oct 19.

PMID:
27758152
30.

Auditory steady-state responses as neural correlates of loudness growth.

Van Eeckhoutte M, Wouters J, Francart T.

Hear Res. 2016 Dec;342:58-68. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2016.09.009. Epub 2016 Sep 29.

PMID:
27693684
31.

The effect of head-related filtering and ear-specific decoding bias on auditory attention detection.

Das N, Biesmans W, Bertrand A, Francart T.

J Neural Eng. 2016 Oct;13(5):056014. doi: 10.1088/1741-2560/13/5/056014. Epub 2016 Sep 13.

PMID:
27618842
32.

EEG-Informed Attended Speaker Extraction From Recorded Speech Mixtures With Application in Neuro-Steered Hearing Prostheses.

Van Eyndhoven S, Francart T, Bertrand A.

IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2017 May;64(5):1045-1056. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2016.2587382. Epub 2016 Jul 7.

PMID:
27392339
33.

Auditory-Inspired Speech Envelope Extraction Methods for Improved EEG-Based Auditory Attention Detection in a Cocktail Party Scenario.

Biesmans W, Das N, Francart T, Bertrand A.

IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2017 May;25(5):402-412. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2016.2571900. Epub 2016 May 24.

PMID:
27244743
34.

Comparison of speech envelope extraction methods for EEG-based auditory attention detection in a cocktail party scenario.

Biesmans W, Vanthornhout J, Wouters J, Moonen M, Francart T, Bertrand A.

Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2015;2015:5155-8. doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2015.7319552.

PMID:
26737452
35.

Amplitude Modulation Detection and Speech Recognition in Late-Implanted Prelingually and Postlingually Deafened Cochlear Implant Users.

De Ruiter AM, Debruyne JA, Chenault MN, Francart T, Brokx JP.

Ear Hear. 2015 Sep-Oct;36(5):557-66. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000162.

PMID:
25851075
36.

Comparison of Psychophysical and Physical Measurements of Real Ear to Coupler Differences.

Koning R, Wouters J, Francart T.

Ear Hear. 2015 Sep-Oct;36(5):543-9. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000159.

PMID:
25822646
37.

Effect of Channel Envelope Synchrony on Interaural Time Difference Sensitivity in Bilateral Cochlear Implant Listeners.

Francart T, Lenssen A, Büchner A, Lenarz T, Wouters J.

Ear Hear. 2015 Jul-Aug;36(4):e199-206. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000152.

PMID:
25738574
38.

Speech perception with F0mod, a cochlear implant pitch coding strategy.

Francart T, Osses A, Wouters J.

Int J Audiol. 2015 Jun;54(6):424-32. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2014.989455. Epub 2015 Feb 20.

PMID:
25697275
39.

Loudness of time-varying stimuli with electric stimulation.

Francart T, Innes-Brown H, McDermott HJ, McKay CM.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2014 Jun;135(6):3513-9. doi: 10.1121/1.4874597.

PMID:
24907814
40.

Modulation enhancement in the electrical signal improves perception of interaural time differences with bimodal stimulation.

Francart T, Lenssen A, Wouters J.

J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2014 Aug;15(4):633-47. doi: 10.1007/s10162-014-0457-9. Epub 2014 Jun 3.

41.

Psychophysics, fitting, and signal processing for combined hearing aid and cochlear implant stimulation.

Francart T, McDermott HJ.

Ear Hear. 2013 Nov-Dec;34(6):685-700. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31829d14cb. Review.

PMID:
24165299
42.

Speech perception and localisation with SCORE bimodal: a loudness normalisation strategy for combined cochlear implant and hearing aid stimulation.

Francart T, McDermott H.

PLoS One. 2012;7(10):e45385. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0045385. Epub 2012 Oct 24.

43.

Development of a loudness normalisation strategy for combined cochlear implant and acoustic stimulation.

Francart T, McDermott HJ.

Hear Res. 2012 Dec;294(1-2):114-24. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2012.09.002. Epub 2012 Sep 18.

PMID:
23000118
44.

The effect of interaural differences in envelope shape on the perceived location of sounds (L).

Francart T, Lenssen A, Wouters J.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2012 Aug;132(2):611-4. doi: 10.1121/1.4733557.

PMID:
22894182
45.

Differential recognition of pitch patterns in discrete and gliding stimuli in congenital amusia: evidence from Mandarin speakers.

Liu F, Xu Y, Patel AD, Francart T, Jiang C.

Brain Cogn. 2012 Aug;79(3):209-15. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2012.03.008. Epub 2012 Apr 28.

PMID:
22546729
46.

Enhancement of interaural level differences improves sound localization in bimodal hearing.

Francart T, Lenssen A, Wouters J.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2011 Nov;130(5):2817-26. doi: 10.1121/1.3641414.

PMID:
22087910
47.

Bimodal listeners are not sensitive to interaural time differences in unmodulated low-frequency stimuli (L).

Lenssen A, Francart T, Brokx J, Wouters J.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2011 Jun;129(6):3457-60. doi: 10.1121/1.3557051.

PMID:
21682370
48.

Binaural unmasking of multi-channel stimuli in bilateral cochlear implant users.

Van Deun L, van Wieringen A, Francart T, Büchner A, Lenarz T, Wouters J.

J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2011 Oct;12(5):659-70. doi: 10.1007/s10162-011-0275-2. Epub 2011 Jun 9.

49.

Comparison of fluctuating maskers for speech recognition tests.

Francart T, van Wieringen A, Wouters J.

Int J Audiol. 2011 Jan;50(1):2-13. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2010.505582. Epub 2010 Nov 23.

PMID:
21091261
50.

Sensitivity of bimodal listeners to interaural time differences with modulated single- and multiple-channel stimuli.

Francart T, Lenssen A, Wouters J.

Audiol Neurootol. 2011;16(2):82-92. doi: 10.1159/000313329. Epub 2010 Jun 19.

PMID:
20571259

Supplemental Content

Loading ...
Support Center