Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Search results

Items: 7

1.

Identifying the benefits and risks of emerging integration methods for upper limb prosthetic devices in the United States: an environmental scan.

Kelley MA, Benz H, Engdahl S, Bridges JFP.

Expert Rev Med Devices. 2019 Jul;16(7):631-641. doi: 10.1080/17434440.2019.1626231. Epub 2019 Jun 17. Review.

PMID:
31145868
2.

Reliability of upper limb movement quality metrics during everyday tasks.

Engdahl SM, Gates DH.

Gait Posture. 2019 Jun;71:253-260. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2019.04.023. Epub 2019 Apr 25.

PMID:
31096132
3.

Reliability of upper limb and trunk joint angles in healthy adults during activities of daily living.

Engdahl SM, Gates DH.

Gait Posture. 2018 Feb;60:41-47. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.11.001. Epub 2017 Nov 8.

4.

Factors associated with interest in novel interfaces for upper limb prosthesis control.

Engdahl SM, Chestek CA, Kelly B, Davis A, Gates DH.

PLoS One. 2017 Aug 2;12(8):e0182482. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182482. eCollection 2017.

5.

Surveying the interest of individuals with upper limb loss in novel prosthetic control techniques.

Engdahl SM, Christie BP, Kelly B, Davis A, Chestek CA, Gates DH.

J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2015 Jun 13;12:53. doi: 10.1186/s12984-015-0044-2.

6.

Implanted electrodes for multi-month EEG.

Jochum T, Engdahl S, Kolls BJ, Wolf P.

Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2014;2014:6543-8. doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2014.6945127.

PMID:
25571495
7.

Association of the NADPH:protochlorophyllide oxidoreductase (POR) with isolated etioplast inner membranes from wheat.

Engdahl S, Aronsson H, Sundqvist C, Timko MP, Dahlin C.

Plant J. 2001 Aug;27(4):297-304.

Supplemental Content

Loading ...
Support Center