Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Search results

Items: 14

1.

The changing contribution of top-down and bottom-up limitation of mesopredators during 220 years of land use and climate change.

Pasanen-Mortensen M, Elmhagen B, Lindén H, Bergström R, Wallgren M, van der Velde Y, Cousins SA.

J Anim Ecol. 2017 May;86(3):566-576. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12633. Epub 2017 Feb 28.

PMID:
28075011
2.

Paws without claws? Ecological effects of large carnivores in anthropogenic landscapes.

Kuijper DP, Sahlén E, Elmhagen B, Chamaillé-Jammes S, Sand H, Lone K, Cromsigt JP.

Proc Biol Sci. 2016 Oct 26;283(1841). pii: 20161625. Review.

3.

The influence of spatiotemporal conditions and personality on survival in reintroductions-evolutionary implications.

Haage M, Maran T, Bergvall UA, Elmhagen B, Angerbjörn A.

Oecologia. 2017 Jan;183(1):45-56. doi: 10.1007/s00442-016-3740-0. Epub 2016 Oct 8.

4.

A boreal invasion in response to climate change? Range shifts and community effects in the borderland between forest and tundra.

Elmhagen B, Kindberg J, Hellström P, Angerbjörn A.

Ambio. 2015 Jan;44 Suppl 1:S39-50. doi: 10.1007/s13280-014-0606-8.

5.

Implications of climate and land-use change for landscape processes, biodiversity, ecosystem services, and governance.

Elmhagen B, Eriksson O, Lindborg R.

Ambio. 2015 Jan;44 Suppl 1:S1-5. doi: 10.1007/s13280-014-0596-6.

6.

The relationship between wolverine and larger predators, lynx and wolf, in a historical ecosystem context.

Khalil H, Pasanen-Mortensen M, Elmhagen B.

Oecologia. 2014 Jun;175(2):625-37. doi: 10.1007/s00442-014-2918-6. Epub 2014 Mar 21.

PMID:
24652527
7.

Status and ecological effects of the world's largest carnivores.

Ripple WJ, Estes JA, Beschta RL, Wilmers CC, Ritchie EG, Hebblewhite M, Berger J, Elmhagen B, Letnic M, Nelson MP, Schmitz OJ, Smith DW, Wallach AD, Wirsing AJ.

Science. 2014 Jan 10;343(6167):1241484. doi: 10.1126/science.1241484. Review.

PMID:
24408439
8.

Life history traits in a cyclic ecosystem: a field experiment on the arctic fox.

Meijer T, Elmhagen B, Eide NE, Angerbjörn A.

Oecologia. 2013 Oct;173(2):439-47. doi: 10.1007/s00442-013-2641-8. Epub 2013 Mar 20.

PMID:
23512202
9.

Ecosystem restoration with teeth: what role for predators?

Ritchie EG, Elmhagen B, Glen AS, Letnic M, Ludwig G, McDonald RA.

Trends Ecol Evol. 2012 May;27(5):265-71. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2012.01.001. Epub 2012 Feb 8.

PMID:
22321653
10.

Top predators, mesopredators and their prey: interference ecosystems along bioclimatic productivity gradients.

Elmhagen B, Ludwig G, Rushton SP, Helle P, Lindén H.

J Anim Ecol. 2010 Jul;79(4):785-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2010.01678.x. Epub 2010 Mar 10.

PMID:
20337755
11.

Trophic control of mesopredators in terrestrial ecosystems: top-down or bottom-up?

Elmhagen B, Rushton SP.

Ecol Lett. 2007 Mar;10(3):197-206.

PMID:
17305803
12.

Population structure in a critically endangered arctic fox population: does genetics matter?

Dalén L, Kvaløy K, Linnell JD, Elmhagen B, Strand O, Tannerfeldt M, Henttonen H, Fuglei E, Landa A, Angerbjörn A.

Mol Ecol. 2006 Sep;15(10):2809-19.

PMID:
16911202
13.

DNA analysis on fox faeces and competition induced niche shifts.

Dalen L, Elmhagen B, Angerbjorn A.

Mol Ecol. 2004 Aug;13(8):2389-92.

PMID:
15245411
14.

Exclusion by interference competition? The relationship between red and arctic foxes.

Tannerfeldt M, Elmhagen B, Angerbjörn A.

Oecologia. 2002 Jul;132(2):213-220. doi: 10.1007/s00442-002-0967-8. Epub 2002 Jul 1.

PMID:
28547354

Supplemental Content

Loading ...
Support Center