Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Search results

Items: 1 to 50 of 223

1.

Task goals modulate the activation of part-based versus object-based representations in visual working memory.

McCants CW, Katus T, Eimer M.

Cogn Neurosci. 2019 Jul 17:1-9. doi: 10.1080/17588928.2019.1642864. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
31311410
2.

The roles of relevance and expectation for the control of attention in visual search.

Berggren N, Eimer M.

J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2019 Jun 3. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000666. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
31157535
3.

Shifts of Spatial Attention in Visual and Tactile Working Memory are Controlled by Independent Modality-Specific Mechanisms.

Katus T, Eimer M.

Cereb Cortex. 2019 May 9. pii: bhz088. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhz088. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
31070225
4.

The N2cc component as an electrophysiological marker of space-based and feature-based attentional target selection processes in touch.

Katus T, Eimer M.

Psychophysiology. 2019 May 8:e13391. doi: 10.1111/psyp.13391. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
31066917
5.

The capacity and resolution of spatial working memory and its role in the storage of non-spatial features.

McCants CW, Katus T, Eimer M.

Biol Psychol. 2019 Jan;140:108-118. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2018.12.006. Epub 2018 Dec 11.

PMID:
30550778
6.

Water input into the Mariana subduction zone estimated from ocean-bottom seismic data.

Cai C, Wiens DA, Shen W, Eimer M.

Nature. 2018 Nov;563(7731):389-392. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0655-4. Epub 2018 Nov 14.

PMID:
30429549
7.

Electrophysiological correlates of active suppression and attentional selection in preview visual search.

Berggren N, Eimer M.

Neuropsychologia. 2018 Nov;120:75-85. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.10.016. Epub 2018 Oct 22.

PMID:
30359651
8.

The Sources of Dual-task Costs in Multisensory Working Memory Tasks.

Katus T, Eimer M.

J Cogn Neurosci. 2019 Feb;31(2):175-185. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01348. Epub 2018 Oct 2.

PMID:
30277430
9.

The Time Course of Target Template Activation Processes during Preparation for Visual Search.

Grubert A, Eimer M.

J Neurosci. 2018 Oct 31;38(44):9527-9538. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0409-18.2018. Epub 2018 Sep 21.

10.

Holistic face perception is impaired in developmental prosopagnosia.

Towler J, Fisher K, Eimer M.

Cortex. 2018 Nov;108:112-126. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2018.07.019. Epub 2018 Aug 6.

PMID:
30165324
11.

Visual Working Memory Load Disrupts Template-guided Attentional Selection during Visual Search.

Berggren N, Eimer M.

J Cogn Neurosci. 2018 Aug 20:1-14. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01324. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
30125222
12.

Author Correction: Multivariate EEG analyses support high-resolution tracking of feature-based attentional selection.

Fahrenfort JJ, Grubert A, Olivers CNL, Eimer M.

Sci Rep. 2018 Jul 20;8(1):11236. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-29326-5.

13.

Visual working memory load disrupts the space-based attentional guidance of target selection.

Berggren N, Eimer M.

Br J Psychol. 2019 May;110(2):357-371. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12323. Epub 2018 Jun 26.

PMID:
29943810
14.

Object-based target templates guide attention during visual search.

Berggren N, Eimer M.

J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2018 Sep;44(9):1368-1382. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000541. Epub 2018 May 3.

PMID:
29723006
15.

Category-based attentional guidance can operate in parallel for multiple target objects.

Jenkins M, Grubert A, Eimer M.

Biol Psychol. 2018 May;135:211-219. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2018.04.006. Epub 2018 Apr 30.

PMID:
29715495
16.

What do associations and dissociations between face and object recognition abilities tell us about the domain-generality of face processing?

Eimer M.

Cogn Neuropsychol. 2018 Feb - Mar;35(1-2):80-82. doi: 10.1080/02643294.2017.1414691. No abstract available.

PMID:
29658415
17.

The guidance of visual search by shape features and shape configurations.

McCants CW, Berggren N, Eimer M.

J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2018 Jul;44(7):1072-1085. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000514. Epub 2018 Mar 1.

PMID:
29494192
18.

Feature-guided attentional capture cannot be prevented by spatial filtering.

Berggren N, Eimer M.

Biol Psychol. 2018 Apr;134:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2018.02.007. Epub 2018 Feb 16.

PMID:
29458180
19.

Independent Attention Mechanisms Control the Activation of Tactile and Visual Working Memory Representations.

Katus T, Eimer M.

J Cogn Neurosci. 2018 May;30(5):644-655. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01239. Epub 2018 Jan 18.

PMID:
29346019
20.

Why the item will remain the unit of attentional selection in visual search.

Eimer M.

Behav Brain Sci. 2017 Jan;40:e137. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X16000078.

PMID:
29342618
21.

Target objects defined by a conjunction of colour and shape can be selected independently and in parallel.

Jenkins M, Grubert A, Eimer M.

Atten Percept Psychophys. 2017 Nov;79(8):2310-2326. doi: 10.3758/s13414-017-1410-x.

PMID:
28849409
22.

Multivariate EEG analyses support high-resolution tracking of feature-based attentional selection.

Fahrenfort JJ, Grubert A, Olivers CNL, Eimer M.

Sci Rep. 2017 May 15;7(1):1886. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-01911-0. Erratum in: Sci Rep. 2018 Jul 20;8(1):11236.

23.

The speed of voluntary and priority-driven shifts of visual attention.

Jenkins M, Grubert A, Eimer M.

J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2018 Jan;44(1):27-37. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000438. Epub 2017 Apr 27.

PMID:
28447847
24.

Face identity matching is selectively impaired in developmental prosopagnosia.

Fisher K, Towler J, Eimer M.

Cortex. 2017 Apr;89:11-27. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2017.01.003. Epub 2017 Jan 11.

PMID:
28189665
25.

The cognitive and neural basis of developmental prosopagnosia.

Towler J, Fisher K, Eimer M.

Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2017 Feb;70(2):316-344. Epub 2016 Apr 27. Review.

PMID:
26967836
26.

Rapid attentional selection processes operate independently and in parallel for multiple targets.

Grubert A, Eimer M.

Biol Psychol. 2016 Dec;121(Pt A):99-108. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2016.10.012. Epub 2016 Oct 25.

PMID:
27793674
27.

Intermodal Attention Shifts in Multimodal Working Memory.

Katus T, Grubert A, Eimer M.

J Cogn Neurosci. 2017 Apr;29(4):628-636. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01072. Epub 2016 Oct 28.

PMID:
27791432
28.
29.

The Control of Single-color and Multiple-color Visual Search by Attentional Templates in Working Memory and in Long-term Memory.

Grubert A, Carlisle NB, Eimer M.

J Cogn Neurosci. 2016 Dec;28(12):1947-1963. Epub 2016 Jul 26.

PMID:
27458746
30.

Electrophysiological evidence for parts and wholes in visual face memory.

Towler J, Eimer M.

Cortex. 2016 Oct;83:246-58. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2016.07.022. Epub 2016 Aug 9.

PMID:
27614900
31.

Rapid top-down control over template-guided attention shifts to multiple objects.

Grubert A, Fahrenfort J, Olivers CNL, Eimer M.

Neuroimage. 2017 Feb 1;146:843-858. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.08.039. Epub 2016 Aug 21.

PMID:
27554532
32.

Multiple foci of spatial attention in multimodal working memory.

Katus T, Eimer M.

Neuroimage. 2016 Nov 15;142:583-589. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.08.019. Epub 2016 Aug 17.

PMID:
27544450
33.

The control of attentional target selection in a colour/colour conjunction task.

Berggren N, Eimer M.

Atten Percept Psychophys. 2016 Nov;78(8):2383-2396.

PMID:
27357843
34.

Rapid Parallel Attentional Selection Can Be Controlled by Shape and Alphanumerical Category.

Jenkins M, Grubert A, Eimer M.

J Cogn Neurosci. 2016 Nov;28(11):1672-1687. Epub 2016 Jun 17.

PMID:
27315274
35.

The Role of Color in Search Templates for Real-world Target Objects.

Nako R, Smith TJ, Eimer M.

J Cogn Neurosci. 2016 Nov;28(11):1714-1727. Epub 2016 Jun 17.

PMID:
27315273
36.

Category-based guidance of spatial attention during visual search for feature conjunctions.

Nako R, Grubert A, Eimer M.

J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2016 Oct;42(10):1571-86. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000244. Epub 2016 May 23.

PMID:
27213833
37.

Reduced sensitivity to contrast signals from the eye region in developmental prosopagnosia.

Fisher K, Towler J, Eimer M.

Cortex. 2016 Aug;81:64-78. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2016.04.005. Epub 2016 Apr 13.

PMID:
27179151
38.

The guidance of spatial attention during visual search for color combinations and color configurations.

Berggren N, Eimer M.

J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2016 Sep;42(9):1282-96. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000225. Epub 2016 Mar 10.

PMID:
26962846
39.

All set, indeed! N2pc components reveal simultaneous attentional control settings for multiple target colors.

Grubert A, Eimer M.

J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2016 Aug;42(8):1215-30. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000221. Epub 2016 Mar 7.

PMID:
26950386
40.

Perceptual face processing in developmental prosopagnosia is not sensitive to the canonical location of face parts.

Towler J, Parketny J, Eimer M.

Cortex. 2016 Jan;74:53-66. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2015.10.018. Epub 2015 Nov 5.

PMID:
26649913
41.

Facial identity and facial expression are initially integrated at visual perceptual stages of face processing.

Fisher K, Towler J, Eimer M.

Neuropsychologia. 2016 Jan 8;80:115-125. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.11.011. Epub 2015 Nov 12.

PMID:
26581627
42.

The Speed of Serial Attention Shifts in Visual Search: Evidence from the N2pc Component.

Grubert A, Eimer M.

J Cogn Neurosci. 2016 Feb;28(2):319-32. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00898. Epub 2015 Oct 21.

PMID:
26488588
43.

Facial misidentifications arise from the erroneous activation of visual face memory.

Wirth BE, Fisher K, Towler J, Eimer M.

Neuropsychologia. 2015 Oct;77:387-99. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.09.021. Epub 2015 Sep 15.

PMID:
26384776
44.

The activation of visual face memory and explicit face recognition are delayed in developmental prosopagnosia.

Parketny J, Towler J, Eimer M.

Neuropsychologia. 2015 Aug;75:538-47. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.07.009. Epub 2015 Jul 10.

PMID:
26169316
45.

EPS Mid-Career Award 2014. The control of attention in visual search: Cognitive and neural mechanisms.

Eimer M.

Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2015;68(12):2437-63. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2015.1065283. Epub 2015 Jul 28.

PMID:
26110448
46.

Effects of contrast inversion on face perception depend on gaze location: Evidence from the N170 component.

Fisher K, Towler J, Eimer M.

Cogn Neurosci. 2016 Jan-Oct;7(1-4):128-37. doi: 10.1080/17588928.2015.1053441. Epub 2015 Jun 17.

PMID:
25996529
47.
48.

The Focus of Spatial Attention Determines the Number and Precision of Face Representations in Working Memory.

Towler J, Kelly M, Eimer M.

Cereb Cortex. 2016 Jun;26(6):2530-40. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhv083. Epub 2015 Apr 22.

PMID:
25903465
49.

Visual search is postponed during the period of the AB: An event-related potential study.

Lagroix HE, Grubert A, Spalek TM, Di Lollo V, Eimer M.

Psychophysiology. 2015 Aug;52(8):1031-8. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12435. Epub 2015 Apr 14.

PMID:
25871502
50.

Sustained maintenance of somatotopic information in brain regions recruited by tactile working memory.

Katus T, Müller MM, Eimer M.

J Neurosci. 2015 Jan 28;35(4):1390-5. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3535-14.2015.

Supplemental Content

Support Center