Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Search results

Items: 10

1.

Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: observational follow-up of a multicentre randomised trial.

Schulten SFM, Detollenaere RJ, Stekelenburg J, IntHout J, Kluivers KB, van Eijndhoven HWF.

BMJ. 2019 Sep 10;366:l5149. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l5149.

2.

Comment on "Hysteropreservation versus hysterectomy in the surgical treatment of uterine prolapse: systematic review and meta-analysis".

Detollenaere RJ, van Eijndhoven HWF.

Int Urogynecol J. 2018 Apr;29(4):603. doi: 10.1007/s00192-018-3553-2. Epub 2018 Feb 7. No abstract available.

PMID:
29417161
3.

Dutch women's attitudes towards hysterectomy and uterus preservation in surgical treatment of pelvic organ prolapse.

van IJsselmuiden MN, Detollenaere RJ, Gerritse MBE, Kluivers KB, Bongers MY, van Eijndhoven HWF.

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018 Jan;220:79-83. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.11.016. Epub 2017 Nov 21.

PMID:
29175132
4.

The Impact of Sacrospinous Hysteropexy and Vaginal Hysterectomy With Suspension of the Uterosacral Ligaments on Sexual Function in Women With Uterine Prolapse: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Comparative Study.

Detollenaere RJ, Kreuwel IA, Dijkstra JR, Kluivers KB, van Eijndhoven HW.

J Sex Med. 2016 Feb;13(2):213-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2015.12.006. Epub 2016 Jan 21.

PMID:
26805940
5.

Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: multicentre randomised non-inferiority trial.

Detollenaere RJ, den Boon J, Stekelenburg J, IntHout J, Vierhout ME, Kluivers KB, van Eijndhoven HW.

BMJ. 2015 Jul 23;351:h3717. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h3717.

6.

Practice pattern variation in surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence in The Netherlands.

van IJsselmuiden MN, Detollenaere RJ, Kampen MY, Engberts MK, van Eijndhoven HW.

Int Urogynecol J. 2015 Nov;26(11):1649-56. doi: 10.1007/s00192-015-2755-0. Epub 2015 Jul 6.

PMID:
26143226
7.

Hysteropexy in the treatment of uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: a multicenter randomized controlled non-inferiority trial comparing laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy with vaginal sacrospinous hysteropexy (LAVA-trial, study protocol).

van IJsselmuiden MN, Coolen AL, Detollenaere RJ, den Boon J, Bongers M, van de Pol G, Vollebregt A, Radder CM, Deprest J, van Eijndhoven HW.

BMC Womens Health. 2014 Sep 17;14:112. doi: 10.1186/1472-6874-14-112.

8.

An unusual way to give birth: the patient's son was delivered paravaginally while she was en route to the hospital.

Detollenaere RJ, de Haan HH.

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Sep;207(3):237.e1-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.03.023. Epub 2012 Mar 29. No abstract available.

PMID:
22541857
9.

[Uterus preserving surgery versus vaginal hysterectomy in treatment of uterine descent: a systematic review].

Detollenaere RJ, den Boon J, Vierhout ME, van Eijndhoven HW.

Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2011;155(42):A3623. Review. Dutch.

PMID:
22027462
10.

Treatment of uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: a randomized multicenter trial comparing sacrospinous fixation with vaginal hysterectomy (SAVE U trial).

Detollenaere RJ, den Boon J, Stekelenburg J, Alhafidh AH, Hakvoort RA, Vierhout ME, van Eijndhoven HW.

BMC Womens Health. 2011 Feb 15;11:4. doi: 10.1186/1472-6874-11-4.

Supplemental Content

Loading ...
Support Center