Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Int J Spine Surg. 2019 Feb 22;13(1):17-23. doi: 10.14444/6002. eCollection 2019 Jan.

Quantifying Range of Motion and Stress Patterns at the Transitional Lumbosacral Junction: Pilot Study Using a Computational Model for Load-Bearing at Accessory L5-S1 Articulation.

Author information

1
Department of Preclinical Sciences, Faculty of Medical Sciences, The University of The West Indies, St. Augustine, Trinidad and Tobago.
2
Ohio Musculoskeletal & Neurological Institute (OMNI), Department of Biomedical Sciences, Ohio University, Athens, Ohio.
3
School of Mechanical Engineering, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Kancheepuram District, Tamil Nadu, India.

Abstract

Background:

Symptomatic or asymptomatic transitional anomalies at the lumbosacral junction are common occurrences in the population. Lumbosacral (L5-S1) accessory articulations are the most common presentations of transitional anomalies at this region. Such anatomical alterations are believed to be associated with biomechanical changes of load-bearing and movement restrictions leading to low back pain. This study attempts to use computational models of a normal and a lumbosacral transitional vertebrae (LSTV) accessory articulation to analyze and compare the range of motion and loading patterns at the lumbosacral articulations.

Methods:

Three-dimensional Finite Element computational models of normal and accessory L5-S1 articulated sacrum were created. These models were tested for range of motion and stress patterns generated at the lumbosacral articulations using similar loading and motion simulation to elicit different moments/excursions at the lumbosacral junctions.

Results:

Compared to the normal variant, the transitional model exhibited different range of motion and divergent patterns of stress generation at the lumbosacral and accessory articulations with equal and physiological magnitudes of loading applied to both the models.

Conclusions:

The finite element modeling approach can be used for biomechanical investigations in LSTV variants. However, larger sample studies with different LSTV models may be required to statistically compare movement and loading patterns at LSTV-affected lumbosacral and sacroiliac junctions, and to recommend definitive treatment strategies in these situations.

KEYWORDS:

Finite Element; LSTV; accessory-articulation; low back pain; pars inter-articularis; stress

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosures and COI: The authors received no funding for this study and report no conflicts of interest.

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center