Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Search results

Items: 31

1.

Older Adults' Lure Discrimination Difficulties on the Mnemonic Similarity Test are Significantly Correlated with their Visual Perception.

Davidson PSR, Vidjen P, Trincao-Batra S, Collin CA.

J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2018 Nov 8. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gby130. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
30407604
2.

Neurog3-dependent pancreas dysgenesis causes ectopic pancreas in Hes1 mutant mice.

Jørgensen MC, de Lichtenberg KH, Collin CA, Klinck R, Ekberg JH, Engelstoft MS, Lickert H, Serup P.

Development. 2018 Sep 3;145(17). pii: dev163568. doi: 10.1242/dev.163568.

3.

Utility of the Hebb-Williams Maze Paradigm for Translational Research in Fragile X Syndrome: A Direct Comparison of Mice and Humans.

Boutet I, Collin CA, MacLeod LS, Messier C, Holahan MR, Berry-Kravis E, Gandhi RM, Kogan CS.

Front Mol Neurosci. 2018 Mar 28;11:99. doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2018.00099. eCollection 2018.

4.

Floral guidance of learning a preference for symmetry by bumblebees.

Plowright CMS, Bridger JJM, Xu V, Herlehy RA, Collin CA.

Anim Cogn. 2017 Nov;20(6):1115-1127. doi: 10.1007/s10071-017-1128-0. Epub 2017 Aug 30.

PMID:
28856458
5.

Faces elicit different scanning patterns depending on task demands.

Boutet I, Lemieux CL, Goulet MA, Collin CA.

Atten Percept Psychophys. 2017 May;79(4):1050-1063. doi: 10.3758/s13414-017-1284-y.

PMID:
28185225
6.

On the particular vulnerability of face recognition to aging: a review of three hypotheses.

Boutet I, Taler V, Collin CA.

Front Psychol. 2015 Aug 21;6:1139. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01139. eCollection 2015. Review.

7.

A brief peripheral motion contrast threshold test predicts older drivers' hazardous behaviors in simulated driving.

Henderson S, Woods-Fry H, Collin CA, Gagnon S, Voloaca M, Grant J, Rosenthal T, Allen W.

Accid Anal Prev. 2015 May;78:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2015.01.020. Epub 2015 Feb 23.

PMID:
25722177
8.

Modulations of eye movement patterns by spatial filtering during the learning and testing phases of an old/new face recognition task.

Lemieux CL, Collin CA, Nelson EA.

Atten Percept Psychophys. 2015 Feb;77(2):536-50. doi: 10.3758/s13414-014-0778-0.

PMID:
25287618
9.
10.

Effects of band-pass spatial frequency filtering of face and object images on the amplitude of N170.

Collin CA, Therrien ME, Campbell KB, Hamm JP.

Perception. 2012;41(6):717-32.

PMID:
23094460
11.

Metamemory for faces, names, and common nouns.

Watier NN, Collin CA.

Acta Psychol (Amst). 2011 Sep;138(1):143-54. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.05.017.

PMID:
21684506
12.
13.
14.

The bilateral field advantage in a sequential face-name matching task with famous and nonfamous faces.

Collin CA, Byrne S.

Can J Exp Psychol. 2010 Mar;64(1):25-32. doi: 10.1037/a0016312.

PMID:
20384415
15.

Effects of familiarity on spatial frequency thresholds for face matching.

Watier NN, Collin CA.

Perception. 2009;38(10):1497-507.

PMID:
19950481
16.

A significant bilateral field advantage for shapes defined by static and motion cues.

Collin CA, McMullen PA, Séguin JA.

Perception. 2009;38(8):1132-43.

PMID:
19817147
17.

A comparative study of the performance of individuals with fragile X syndrome and Fmr1 knockout mice on Hebb-Williams mazes.

MacLeod LS, Kogan CS, Collin CA, Berry-Kravis E, Messier C, Gandhi R.

Genes Brain Behav. 2010 Feb;9(1):53-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-183X.2009.00534.x. Epub 2009 Aug 29.

18.

Behavioral effects of visual field location on processing motion- and luminance-defined form.

McMullen PA, MacSween LE, Collin CA.

J Vis. 2009 Jun 30;9(6):24.1-11. doi: 10.1167/9.6.24.

PMID:
19761315
19.

The influence of strongly focused visual attention on the detection of change in an auditory pattern.

Sculthorpe LD, Collin CA, Campbell KB.

Brain Res. 2008 Oct 9;1234:78-86. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.07.031. Epub 2008 Jul 17.

PMID:
18674520
20.

Effects of image background on spatial-frequency thresholds for face recognition.

Collin CA, Wang L, O'Byrne B.

Perception. 2006;35(11):1459-72.

PMID:
17286117
21.

Spatial frequency thresholds for face recognition when comparison faces are filtered and unfiltered.

Collin CA, Therrien M, Martin C, Rainville S.

Percept Psychophys. 2006 Aug;68(6):879-89.

PMID:
17153184
22.
23.
24.

Recognizing faces defined by texture gradients.

Liu CH, Collin CA, Farivar R, Chaudhuri A.

Percept Psychophys. 2005 Jan;67(1):158-67.

PMID:
15912879
25.

Face recognition is affected by similarity in spatial frequency range to a greater degree than within-category object recognition.

Collin CA, Liu CH, Troje NF, McMullen PA, Chaudhuri A.

J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2004 Oct;30(5):975-87.

PMID:
15462634
26.

Using MATLAB with the psychophysics toolbox to present the heterochromatic fusion nystagmus stimulus.

Collin CA, Chaudhuri A.

Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 2002 Nov;34(4):500-8.

PMID:
12564554
27.

Using Matlab to generate families of similar Attneave shapes.

Collin CA, McMullen PA.

Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 2002 Feb;34(1):55-68.

PMID:
12060991
28.
29.

The effects of spatial frequency overlap on face recognition.

Liu CH, Collin CA, Rainville SJ, Chaudhuri A.

J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2000 Jun;26(3):956-79.

PMID:
10884004
30.

Lighting direction affects recognition of untextured faces in photographic positive and negative.

Liu CH, Collin CA, Burton AM, Chaudhuri A.

Vision Res. 1999 Dec;39(24):4003-9.

31.

A maximum motion technique for assessment of color vision defects.

Collin CA, Chaudhuri A.

Percept Psychophys. 1998 Nov;60(8):1337-43.

PMID:
9865075

Supplemental Content

Loading ...
Support Center