Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Search results

Items: 45

1.

Linguistic processes do not beat visuo-motor constraints, but they modulate where the eyes move regardless of word boundaries: Evidence against top-down word-based eye-movement control during reading.

Albrengues C, Lavigne F, Aguilar C, Castet E, Vitu F.

PLoS One. 2019 Jul 22;14(7):e0219666. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219666. eCollection 2019.

2.

The optimal use of non-optimal letter information in foveal and parafoveal word recognition.

Bernard JB, Castet E.

Vision Res. 2019 Feb;155:44-61. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2018.12.006. Epub 2019 Jan 15.

PMID:
30629974
3.

The influence of word frequency on word reading speed when individuals with macular diseases read text.

Stolowy N, Calabrèse A, Sauvan L, Aguilar C, François T, Gala N, Matonti F, Castet E.

Vision Res. 2019 Feb;155:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2018.12.002. Epub 2019 Jan 4.

PMID:
30571997
4.

A Vision Enhancement System to Improve Face Recognition with Central Vision Loss.

Calabrèse A, Aguilar C, Faure G, Matonti F, Hoffart L, Castet E.

Optom Vis Sci. 2018 Sep;95(9):738-746. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001263.

PMID:
30169352
5.

Motion Masking by Stationary Objects: A Study of Simulated Saccades.

Duyck M, Wexler M, Castet E, Collins T.

Iperception. 2018 May 10;9(3):2041669518773111. doi: 10.1177/2041669518773111. eCollection 2018 May-Jun.

6.

Letter and symbol identification: No evidence for letter-specific crowding mechanisms.

Castet E, Descamps M, Denis-Noël A, Colé P.

J Vis. 2017 Sep 1;17(11):2. doi: 10.1167/17.11.2.

PMID:
28862710
7.

The magnification factor accounts for the greater hypometria and imprecision of larger saccades: Evidence from a parametric human-behavioral study.

Vitu F, Casteau S, Adeli H, Zelinsky GJ, Castet E.

J Vis. 2017 Apr 1;17(4):2. doi: 10.1167/17.4.2.

PMID:
28388698
8.

Evaluation of a gaze-controlled vision enhancement system for reading in visually impaired people.

Aguilar C, Castet E.

PLoS One. 2017 Apr 5;12(4):e0174910. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0174910. eCollection 2017.

9.

Clustering of Eye Fixations: A New Oculomotor Determinant of Reading Speed in Maculopathy.

Calabrèse A, Bernard JB, Faure G, Hoffart L, Castet E.

Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016 Jun 1;57(7):3192-202. doi: 10.1167/iovs.16-19318.

PMID:
27309623
10.

A New Font, Specifically Designed for Peripheral Vision, Improves Peripheral Letter and Word Recognition, but Not Eye-Mediated Reading Performance.

Bernard JB, Aguilar C, Castet E.

PLoS One. 2016 Apr 13;11(4):e0152506. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0152506. eCollection 2016.

11.

Intrasaccadic perception triggers pupillary constriction.

Mathôt S, Melmi JB, Castet E.

PeerJ. 2015 Aug 4;3:e1150. doi: 10.7717/peerj.1150. eCollection 2015.

12.

Role of syllable segmentation processes in peripheral word recognition.

Bernard JB, Calabrèse A, Castet E.

Vision Res. 2014 Dec;105:226-32. Epub 2014 Oct 31.

13.

Eye movements and reading speed in macular disease: the shrinking perceptual span hypothesis requires and is supported by a mediation analysis.

Calabrèse A, Bernard JB, Faure G, Hoffart L, Castet E.

Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014 May 15;55(6):3638-45. doi: 10.1167/iovs.13-13408.

PMID:
24833746
14.

The Optimal Viewing Position effect in the lower visual field.

Yao-N'dré M, Castet E, Vitu F.

Vision Res. 2013 Jan 14;76:114-23. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2012.10.018. Epub 2012 Nov 15.

15.

Quantifying eye stability during a fixation task: a review of definitions and methods.

Castet E, Crossland M.

Seeing Perceiving. 2012;25(5):449-69. Review.

PMID:
22370759
16.

Gaze-contingent simulation of retinopathy: some potential pitfalls and remedies.

Aguilar C, Castet E.

Vision Res. 2011 May 11;51(9):997-1012. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2011.02.010. Epub 2011 Feb 16.

17.

Wet versus dry age-related macular degeneration in patients with central field loss: different effects on maximum reading speed.

Calabrèse A, Bernard JB, Hoffart L, Faure G, Barouch F, Conrath J, Castet E.

Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011 Apr 14;52(5):2417-24. doi: 10.1167/iovs.09-5056.

PMID:
21228374
18.

Similar effect of cueing conditions on attentional and saccadic temporal dynamics.

Filali-Sadouk N, Castet E, Olivier E, Zenon A.

J Vis. 2010 Apr 28;10(4):21.1-13. doi: 10.1167/10.4.21.

PMID:
20465340
19.

Small effect of interline spacing on maximal reading speed in low-vision patients with central field loss irrespective of scotoma size.

Calabrèse A, Bernard JB, Hoffart L, Faure G, Barouch F, Conrath J, Castet E.

Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010 Feb;51(2):1247-54. doi: 10.1167/iovs.09-3682. Epub 2009 Oct 15.

PMID:
19834038
20.

Page mode reading with simulated scotomas: oculo-motor patterns.

Scherlen AC, Bernard JB, Calabrese A, Castet E.

Vision Res. 2008 Aug;48(18):1870-8. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2008.06.005. Epub 2008 Jul 21.

21.

Dynamics of distributed 1D and 2D motion representations for short-latency ocular following.

Barthélemy FV, Perrinet LU, Castet E, Masson GS.

Vision Res. 2008 Feb;48(4):501-22. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2007.10.020. Epub 2008 Jan 25.

22.
23.

Page mode reading with simulated scotomas: a modest effect of interline spacing on reading speed.

Bernard JB, Scherlen AC, Castet E.

Vision Res. 2007 Dec;47(28):3447-59. Erratum in: Vision Res. 2008 May;48(10):1280. Anne-Catherine, Scherlen [corrected to Scherlen, Anne-Catherine]; Eric, Castet [corrected to Castet, Eric].

24.

Bayesian modeling of dynamic motion integration.

Montagnini A, Mamassian P, Perrinet L, Castet E, Masson GS.

J Physiol Paris. 2007 Jan-May;101(1-3):64-77. Epub 2007 Oct 26. Review.

PMID:
18036790
25.

[Retinotopic organization of the human visual cortex: a 3T fMRI study].

Hoffart L, Conrath J, Matonti F, Galland F, Wotawa N, Chavane F, Castet E, Ridings B, Masson GS.

J Fr Ophtalmol. 2007 Oct;30(8):830-6. French.

26.

Dynamics of attentional deployment during saccadic programming.

Castet E, Jeanjean S, Montagnini A, Laugier D, Masson GS.

J Vis. 2006 Mar 3;6(3):196-212.

PMID:
16643090
27.

Nulling the motion aftereffect with dynamic random-dot stimuli: limitations and implications.

Castet E, Keeble DR, Verstraten FA.

J Vis. 2002;2(4):302-11.

PMID:
12678580
28.

Motion perception of saccade-induced retinal translation.

Castet E, Jeanjean S, Masson GS.

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Nov 12;99(23):15159-63. Epub 2002 Nov 4.

29.
30.

High temporal frequency synchrony is insufficient for perceptual grouping.

Morgan M, Castet E.

Proc Biol Sci. 2002 Mar 7;269(1490):513-6.

31.

'Saccadic suppression'- no need for an active extra-retinal mechanism.

Castet E, Jeanjean S, Masson GS.

Trends Neurosci. 2001 Jun;24(6):316-8. No abstract available.

PMID:
11421231
32.

Temporal dynamics of motion integration for the initiation of tracking eye movements at ultra-short latencies.

Masson GS, Rybarczyk Y, Castet E, Mestre DR.

Vis Neurosci. 2000 Sep-Oct;17(5):753-67.

PMID:
11153655
33.

Motion perception during saccadic eye movements.

Castet E, Masson GS.

Nat Neurosci. 2000 Feb;3(2):177-83.

PMID:
10649574
34.

Long-range interactions in the spatial integration of motion signals.

Castet E, Zanker J.

Spat Vis. 1999;12(3):287-307.

PMID:
10442515
35.
36.

Visual search for a tilted target: tests of spatial uncertainty models.

Morgan MJ, Ward RM, Castet E.

Q J Exp Psychol A. 1998 May;51(2):347-70.

PMID:
9621843
37.

The aperture problem in stereopsis.

Morgan MJ, Castet E.

Vision Res. 1997 Oct;37(19):2737-44.

38.
39.

Apparent speed of type I symmetrical plaids.

Castet E, Morgan MJ.

Vision Res. 1996 Jan;36(2):223-32.

40.

Stereoscopic depth perception at high velocities.

Morgan MJ, Castet E.

Nature. 1995 Nov 23;378(6555):380-3.

PMID:
7477373
41.

Apparent speed of sampled motion.

Castet E.

Vision Res. 1995 May;35(10):1375-84.

42.
43.

Perceived speed of moving lines depends on orientation, length, speed and luminance.

Castet E, Lorenceau J, Shiffrar M, Bonnet C.

Vision Res. 1993 Sep;33(14):1921-36.

PMID:
8249311
44.

The inverse intensity effect is not lost with stimuli in apparent motion.

Castet E, Lorenceau J, Bonnet C.

Vision Res. 1993 Aug;33(12):1697-708.

PMID:
8236857
45.

Different motion sensitive units are involved in recovering the direction of moving lines.

Lorenceau J, Shiffrar M, Wells N, Castet E.

Vision Res. 1993 Jun;33(9):1207-17.

PMID:
8333170

Supplemental Content

Loading ...
Support Center