Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Search results

Items: 1 to 50 of 177

1.

A Site-Selection Strategy Based on Polarity Sensitivity for Cochlear Implants: Effects on Spectro-Temporal Resolution and Speech Perception.

Goehring T, Archer-Boyd A, Deeks JM, Arenberg JG, Carlyon RP.

J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2019 Jun 3. doi: 10.1007/s10162-019-00724-4. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
31161338
2.

Simulations of the effect of unlinked cochlear-implant automatic gain control and head movement on interaural level differences.

Archer-Boyd AW, Carlyon RP.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2019 Mar;145(3):1389. doi: 10.1121/1.5093623.

PMID:
31067937
3.

Intraoperative Monitoring of the Cochlear Nerve during Neurofibromatosis Type-2 Vestibular Schwannoma Surgery and Description of a "Test Intracochlear Electrode".

Kasbekar AV, Tam YC, Carlyon RP, Deeks JM, Donnelly N, Tysome J, Mannion R, Axon PR.

J Neurol Surg Rep. 2019 Jan;80(1):e1-e9. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1673649. Epub 2019 Feb 4.

4.

Effect of Chronic Stimulation and Stimulus Level on Temporal Processing by Cochlear Implant Listeners.

Carlyon RP, Guérit F, Billig AJ, Tam YC, Harris F, Deeks JM.

J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2019 Apr;20(2):169-185. doi: 10.1007/s10162-018-00706-y. Epub 2018 Dec 12.

5.

Development and validation of a spectro-temporal processing test for cochlear-implant listeners.

Archer-Boyd AW, Southwell RV, Deeks JM, Turner RE, Carlyon RP.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2018 Nov;144(5):2983. doi: 10.1121/1.5079636.

PMID:
30522311
6.

Effects of the relative timing of opposite-polarity pulses on loudness for cochlear implant listeners.

Guérit F, Marozeau J, Deeks JM, Epp B, Carlyon RP.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2018 Nov;144(5):2751. doi: 10.1121/1.5070150.

PMID:
30522299
7.

Evaluation of Possible Effects of a Potassium Channel Modulator on Temporal Processing by Cochlear Implant Listeners.

Carlyon RP, Deeks JM, Guérit F, Lamping W, Billig AJ, Large CH, Saeed SR, Harris P.

J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2018 Dec;19(6):669-680. doi: 10.1007/s10162-018-00694-z. Epub 2018 Sep 19.

8.

Correction to: Effect of Stimulus Polarity on Detection Thresholds in Cochlear Implant Users: Relationships with Average Threshold, Gap Detection, and Rate Discrimination.

Carlyon RP, Cosentino S, Deeks JM, Parkinson W, Arenberg JG.

J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2018 Oct;19(5):569. doi: 10.1007/s10162-018-00695-y.

9.

A Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study of Tinnitus Awareness and Impact in a Population of Adult Cochlear Implant Users.

Gomersall PA, Baguley DM, Carlyon RP.

Ear Hear. 2019 Jan/Feb;40(1):135-142. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000601.

10.

Effect of Stimulus Polarity on Detection Thresholds in Cochlear Implant Users: Relationships with Average Threshold, Gap Detection, and Rate Discrimination.

Carlyon RP, Cosentino S, Deeks JM, Parkinson W, Arenberg JG.

J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2018 Oct;19(5):559-567. doi: 10.1007/s10162-018-0677-5. Epub 2018 Jun 7. Erratum in: J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2018 Sep 4;:.

11.

Neural Decoding of Bistable Sounds Reveals an Effect of Intention on Perceptual Organization.

Billig AJ, Davis MH, Carlyon RP.

J Neurosci. 2018 Mar 14;38(11):2844-2853. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3022-17.2018. Epub 2018 Feb 13.

12.

Evidence for causal top-down frontal contributions to predictive processes in speech perception.

Cope TE, Sohoglu E, Sedley W, Patterson K, Jones PS, Wiggins J, Dawson C, Grube M, Carlyon RP, Griffiths TD, Davis MH, Rowe JB.

Nat Commun. 2017 Dec 18;8(1):2154. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-01958-7.

13.

Attentional Modulation of Envelope-Following Responses at Lower (93-109 Hz) but Not Higher (217-233 Hz) Modulation Rates.

Holmes E, Purcell DW, Carlyon RP, Gockel HE, Johnsrude IS.

J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2018 Feb;19(1):83-97. doi: 10.1007/s10162-017-0641-9. Epub 2017 Oct 2.

14.

A Re-examination of the Effect of Masker Phase Curvature on Non-simultaneous Masking.

Carlyon RP, Flanagan S, Deeks JM.

J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2017 Dec;18(6):815-825. doi: 10.1007/s10162-017-0637-5. Epub 2017 Aug 23.

15.

Spatial Selectivity in Cochlear Implants: Effects of Asymmetric Waveforms and Development of a Single-Point Measure.

Carlyon RP, Deeks JM, Undurraga J, Macherey O, van Wieringen A.

J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2017 Oct;18(5):711-727. doi: 10.1007/s10162-017-0625-9. Epub 2017 Jul 28.

16.

Effect of Context on the Contribution of Individual Harmonics to Residue Pitch.

Gockel HE, Alsindi S, Hardy C, Carlyon RP.

J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2017 Dec;18(6):803-813. doi: 10.1007/s10162-017-0636-6. Epub 2017 Jul 28.

17.

Effect of Pulse Polarity on Thresholds and on Non-monotonic Loudness Growth in Cochlear Implant Users.

Macherey O, Carlyon RP, Chatron J, Roman S.

J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2017 Jun;18(3):513-527. doi: 10.1007/s10162-016-0614-4. Epub 2017 Jan 30.

18.
19.

Temporal Regularity Detection and Rate Discrimination in Cochlear-Implant Listeners.

Gaudrain E, Deeks JM, Carlyon RP.

J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2017 Apr;18(2):387-397. doi: 10.1007/s10162-016-0586-4. Epub 2016 Sep 29.

20.

Rate discrimination, gap detection and ranking of temporal pitch in cochlear implant users.

Cosentino S, Carlyon RP, Deeks JM, Parkinson W, Bierer JA.

J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2016 Aug;17(4):371-82. doi: 10.1007/s10162-016-0569-5. Epub 2016 Apr 21.

21.

Do Zwicker Tones Evoke a Musical Pitch?

Gockel HE, Carlyon RP.

Adv Exp Med Biol. 2016;894:419-426. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-25474-6_44.

PMID:
27080683
22.

Perception of stochastic envelopes by normal-hearing and cochlear-implant listeners.

Gomersall PA, Turner RE, Baguley DM, Deeks JM, Gockel HE, Carlyon RP.

Hear Res. 2016 Mar;333:8-24. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2015.12.013. Epub 2015 Dec 17.

23.

Combined neural and behavioural measures of temporal pitch perception in cochlear implant users.

Carlyon RP, Deeks JM.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2015 Nov;138(5):2885-905. doi: 10.1121/1.4934275.

PMID:
26627764
24.

Procedural Factors That Affect Psychophysical Measures of Spatial Selectivity in Cochlear Implant Users.

Cosentino S, Deeks JM, Carlyon RP.

Trends Hear. 2015 Sep 29;19. pii: 2331216515607067. doi: 10.1177/2331216515607067. Review.

25.

Automaticity and primacy of auditory streaming: Concurrent subjective and objective measures.

Billig AJ, Carlyon RP.

J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2016 Mar;42(3):339-353. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000146. Epub 2015 Sep 28.

26.

Pitch Discrimination: An Independent Factor in Cochlear Implant Performance Outcomes.

Kenway B, Tam YC, Vanat Z, Harris F, Gray R, Birchall J, Carlyon R, Axon P.

Otol Neurotol. 2015 Sep;36(9):1472-9. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000845.

27.

Multistage Nonlinear Optimization to Recover Neural Activation Patterns From Evoked Compound Action Potentials of Cochlear Implant Users.

Cosentino S, Gaudrain E, Deeks JM, Carlyon RP.

IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2016 Apr;63(4):833-40. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2015.2476373. Epub 2015 Sep 3.

PMID:
26353359
28.

Specificity of the Human Frequency Following Response for Carrier and Modulation Frequency Assessed Using Adaptation.

Gockel HE, Krugliak A, Plack CJ, Carlyon RP.

J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2015 Dec;16(6):747-62. doi: 10.1007/s10162-015-0533-9. Epub 2015 Jul 11.

29.

Effect of Pulse Rate and Polarity on the Sensitivity of Auditory Brainstem and Cochlear Implant Users to Electrical Stimulation.

Carlyon RP, Deeks JM, McKay CM.

J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2015 Oct;16(5):653-68. doi: 10.1007/s10162-015-0530-z. Epub 2015 Jul 3.

30.

Limitations on Monaural and Binaural Temporal Processing in Bilateral Cochlear Implant Listeners.

Ihlefeld A, Carlyon RP, Kan A, Churchill TH, Litovsky RY.

J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2015 Oct;16(5):641-52. doi: 10.1007/s10162-015-0527-7. Epub 2015 Jun 24.

31.

The role of excitation-pattern cues in the detection of frequency shifts in bandpass-filtered complex tones.

Marmel F, Plack CJ, Hopkins K, Carlyon RP, Gockel HE, Moore BC.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2015 May;137(5):2687-97. doi: 10.1121/1.4919315.

32.

Comparison of signal and gap-detection thresholds for focused and broad cochlear implant electrode configurations.

Bierer JA, Deeks JM, Billig AJ, Carlyon RP.

J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2015 Apr;16(2):273-84. doi: 10.1007/s10162-015-0507-y. Epub 2015 Feb 3.

33.

Re-examining the upper limit of temporal pitch.

Macherey O, Carlyon RP.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2014 Dec;136(6):3186. doi: 10.1121/1.4900917.

34.

Evaluation of a cochlear-implant processing strategy incorporating phantom stimulation and asymmetric pulses.

Carlyon RP, Monstrey J, Deeks JM, Macherey O.

Int J Audiol. 2014 Dec;53(12):871-9. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2014.932024. Epub 2014 Oct 30.

35.

Cochlear implants.

Macherey O, Carlyon RP.

Curr Biol. 2014 Sep 22;24(18):R878-R884. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2014.06.053.

36.

The binaural masking level difference: cortical correlates persist despite severe brain stem atrophy in progressive supranuclear palsy.

Hughes LE, Rowe JB, Ghosh BC, Carlyon RP, Plack CJ, Gockel HE.

J Neurophysiol. 2014 Dec 15;112(12):3086-94. doi: 10.1152/jn.00062.2014. Epub 2014 Sep 17.

37.

Central auditory masking by an illusory tone.

Plack CJ, Oxenham AJ, Kreft HA, Carlyon RP.

PLoS One. 2013 Sep 11;8(9):e75822. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0075822. eCollection 2013.

38.

Swinging at a cocktail party: voice familiarity aids speech perception in the presence of a competing voice.

Johnsrude IS, Mackey A, Hakyemez H, Alexander E, Trang HP, Carlyon RP.

Psychol Sci. 2013 Oct;24(10):1995-2004. doi: 10.1177/0956797613482467. Epub 2013 Aug 28.

PMID:
23985575
39.

Lexical influences on auditory streaming.

Billig AJ, Davis MH, Deeks JM, Monstrey J, Carlyon RP.

Curr Biol. 2013 Aug 19;23(16):1585-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2013.06.042. Epub 2013 Jul 25.

40.

Polarity effects on place pitch and loudness for three cochlear-implant designs and at different cochlear sites.

Carlyon RP, Deeks JM, Macherey O.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2013 Jul;134(1):503-9. doi: 10.1121/1.4807900.

PMID:
23862825
41.

Subcortical neural synchrony and absolute thresholds predict frequency discrimination independently.

Marmel F, Linley D, Carlyon RP, Gockel HE, Hopkins K, Plack CJ.

J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2013 Oct;14(5):757-66. doi: 10.1007/s10162-013-0402-3. Epub 2013 Jun 13.

42.

Top-down influences of written text on perceived clarity of degraded speech.

Sohoglu E, Peelle JE, Carlyon RP, Davis MH.

J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2014 Feb;40(1):186-99. doi: 10.1037/a0033206. Epub 2013 Jun 10.

43.

Relationships between auditory nerve activity and temporal pitch perception in cochlear implant users.

Carlyon RP, Deeks JM.

Adv Exp Med Biol. 2013;787:363-71. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-1590-9_40.

PMID:
23716242
44.

No evidence for ITD-specific adaptation in the frequency following response.

Gockel HE, Muhammed L, Farooq R, Plack CJ, Carlyon RP.

Adv Exp Med Biol. 2013;787:231-8. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-1590-9_26.

PMID:
23716228
45.

The polarity sensitivity of the electrically stimulated human auditory nerve measured at the level of the brainstem.

Undurraga JA, Carlyon RP, Wouters J, van Wieringen A.

J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2013 Jun;14(3):359-77. doi: 10.1007/s10162-013-0377-0. Epub 2013 Mar 12.

46.

Using Zebra-speech to study sequential and simultaneous speech segregation in a cochlear-implant simulation.

Gaudrain E, Carlyon RP.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2013 Jan;133(1):502-18. doi: 10.1121/1.4770243.

47.

Further examination of complex pitch perception in the absence of a place-rate match.

Deeks JM, Gockel HE, Carlyon RP.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2013 Jan;133(1):377-88. doi: 10.1121/1.4770254.

PMID:
23297910
48.

Differences between psychoacoustic and frequency following response measures of distortion tone level and masking.

Gockel HE, Farooq R, Muhammed L, Plack CJ, Carlyon RP.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2012 Oct;132(4):2524-35. doi: 10.1121/1.4751541.

49.

Predictive top-down integration of prior knowledge during speech perception.

Sohoglu E, Peelle JE, Carlyon RP, Davis MH.

J Neurosci. 2012 Jun 20;32(25):8443-53. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5069-11.2012.

50.

Spread of excitation varies for different electrical pulse shapes and stimulation modes in cochlear implants.

Undurraga JA, Carlyon RP, Macherey O, Wouters J, van Wieringen A.

Hear Res. 2012 Aug;290(1-2):21-36. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2012.05.003. Epub 2012 May 11.

PMID:
22583921

Supplemental Content

Loading ...
Support Center