Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Search results

Items: 1 to 50 of 128

1.

Prediction of nutrient digestibility in grower-finisher pigs based on faecal microbiota composition.

Verschuren LMG, Schokker D, Bergsma R, Jansman AJM, Molist F, Calus MPL.

J Anim Breed Genet. 2019 Sep 17. doi: 10.1111/jbg.12433. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
31531910
2.

Economic optimization of full-sib test group size and genotyping effort in a breeding program for Atlantic salmon.

Janssen K, Saatkamp HW, Calus MPL, Komen H.

Genet Sel Evol. 2019 Sep 3;51(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s12711-019-0491-5.

3.

Assessment of sire contribution and breed-of-origin of alleles in a three-way crossbred broiler dataset.

Calus MPL, Vandenplas J, Hulsegge I, Borg R, Henshall JM, Hawken R.

Poult Sci. 2019 Aug 8. pii: pez458. doi: 10.3382/ps/pez458. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
31393589
4.

Genomic selection on breeding time in a wild bird population.

Gienapp P, Calus MPL, Laine VN, Visser ME.

Evol Lett. 2019 Mar 5;3(2):142-151. doi: 10.1002/evl3.103. eCollection 2019 Apr.

5.

Validation of genomic predictions for body weight in broilers using crossbred information and considering breed-of-origin of alleles.

Duenk P, Calus MPL, Wientjes YCJ, Breen VP, Henshall JM, Hawken R, Bijma P.

Genet Sel Evol. 2019 Jul 8;51(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s12711-019-0481-7.

6.

A second-level diagonal preconditioner for single-step SNPBLUP.

Vandenplas J, Calus MPL, Eding H, Vuik C.

Genet Sel Evol. 2019 Jun 25;51(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s12711-019-0472-8.

7.

Genomic Evaluation for a Crossbreeding System Implementing Breed-of-Origin for Targeted Markers.

Sevillano CA, Bovenhuis H, Calus MPL.

Front Genet. 2019 May 3;10:418. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2019.00418. eCollection 2019.

8.

Short communication: Genetic correlations between methane and milk production, conformation, and functional traits.

Pszczola M, Calus MPL, Strabel T.

J Dairy Sci. 2019 Jun;102(6):5342-5346. doi: 10.3168/jds.2018-16066. Epub 2019 Mar 28.

PMID:
30928263
9.

Estimating the purebred-crossbred genetic correlation of body weight in broiler chickens with pedigree or genomic relationships.

Duenk P, Calus MPL, Wientjes YCJ, Breen VP, Henshall JM, Hawken R, Bijma P.

Genet Sel Evol. 2019 Feb 19;51(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s12711-019-0447-9.

10.

Required properties for markers used to calculate unbiased estimates of the genetic correlation between populations.

Wientjes YCJ, Calus MPL, Duenk P, Bijma P.

Genet Sel Evol. 2018 Dec 14;50(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s12711-018-0434-6.

11.

Efficient and accurate computation of base generation allele frequencies.

Aldridge MN, Vandenplas J, Calus MPL.

J Dairy Sci. 2019 Feb;102(2):1364-1373. doi: 10.3168/jds.2018-15264. Epub 2018 Nov 22.

PMID:
30471906
12.

Impact of rare and low-frequency sequence variants on reliability of genomic prediction in dairy cattle.

Zhang Q, Sahana G, Su G, Guldbrandtsen B, Lund MS, Calus MPL.

Genet Sel Evol. 2018 Nov 20;50(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s12711-018-0432-8.

13.

Genomic prediction for crossbred performance using metafounders.

van Grevenhof EM, Vandenplas J, Calus MPL.

J Anim Sci. 2019 Feb 1;97(2):548-558. doi: 10.1093/jas/sky433.

PMID:
30423111
14.

Deflated preconditioned conjugate gradient method for solving single-step BLUP models efficiently.

Vandenplas J, Eding H, Calus MPL, Vuik C.

Genet Sel Evol. 2018 Nov 3;50(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12711-018-0429-3.

15.

Effects of alleles in crossbred pigs estimated for genomic prediction depend on their breed-of-origin.

Sevillano CA, Ten Napel J, Guimarães SEF, Silva FF, Calus MPL.

BMC Genomics. 2018 Oct 11;19(1):740. doi: 10.1186/s12864-018-5126-7.

16.

Fecal microbial composition associated with variation in feed efficiency in pigs depends on diet and sex.

Verschuren LMG, Calus MPL, Jansman AJM, Bergsma R, Knol EF, Gilbert H, Zemb O.

J Anim Sci. 2018 Jul 28. doi: 10.1093/jas/sky268. [Epub ahead of print] No abstract available.

17.

Genomic Prediction Using Individual-Level Data and Summary Statistics from Multiple Populations.

Vandenplas J, Calus MPL, Gorjanc G.

Genetics. 2018 Sep;210(1):53-69. doi: 10.1534/genetics.118.301109. Epub 2018 Jul 18.

18.

SNPrune: an efficient algorithm to prune large SNP array and sequence datasets based on high linkage disequilibrium.

Calus MPL, Vandenplas J.

Genet Sel Evol. 2018 Jun 26;50(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s12711-018-0404-z.

19.

Sparse single-step genomic BLUP in crossbreeding schemes.

Vandenplas J, Calus MPL, Ten Napel J.

J Anim Sci. 2018 Jun 4;96(6):2060-2073. doi: 10.1093/jas/sky136.

20.

Human-Mediated Introgression of Haplotypes in a Modern Dairy Cattle Breed.

Zhang Q, Calus MPL, Bosse M, Sahana G, Lund MS, Guldbrandtsen B.

Genetics. 2018 Aug;209(4):1305-1317. doi: 10.1534/genetics.118.301143. Epub 2018 May 30.

21.

The impact of using old germplasm on genetic merit and diversity-A cattle breed case study.

Eynard SE, Windig JJ, Hulsegge I, Hiemstra SJ, Calus MPL.

J Anim Breed Genet. 2018 May 29. doi: 10.1111/jbg.12333. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
29808552
22.

Fecal microbial composition associated with variation in feed efficiency in pigs depends on diet and sex.

Verschuren LMG, Calus MPL, Jansman AJM, Bergsma R, Knol EF, Gilbert H, Zemb O.

J Anim Sci. 2018 Apr 14;96(4):1405-1418. doi: 10.1093/jas/sky060. Erratum in: J Anim Sci. 2018 Jul 28;:.

23.

Multibreed genomic prediction using multitrait genomic residual maximum likelihood and multitask Bayesian variable selection.

Calus MPL, Goddard ME, Wientjes YCJ, Bowman PJ, Hayes BJ.

J Dairy Sci. 2018 May;101(5):4279-4294. doi: 10.3168/jds.2017-13366. Epub 2018 Mar 15.

24.

Correction to: Genomic evaluation for a three-way crossbreeding system considering breed-of-origin of alleles.

Sevillano CA, Vandenplas J, Bastiaansen JWM, Bergsma R, Calus MPL.

Genet Sel Evol. 2017 Dec 27;49(1):93. doi: 10.1186/s12711-017-0367-5.

25.

Which Individuals To Choose To Update the Reference Population? Minimizing the Loss of Genetic Diversity in Animal Genomic Selection Programs.

Eynard SE, Croiseau P, Laloë D, Fritz S, Calus MPL, Restoux G.

G3 (Bethesda). 2018 Jan 4;8(1):113-121. doi: 10.1534/g3.117.1117.

26.

Estimated allele substitution effects underlying genomic evaluation models depend on the scaling of allele counts.

Bouwman AC, Hayes BJ, Calus MPL.

Genet Sel Evol. 2017 Oct 30;49(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s12711-017-0355-9.

27.

Genomic evaluation for a three-way crossbreeding system considering breed-of-origin of alleles.

Sevillano CA, Vandenplas J, Bastiaansen JWM, Bergsma R, Calus MPL.

Genet Sel Evol. 2017 Oct 23;49(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s12711-017-0350-1. Erratum in: Genet Sel Evol. 2017 Dec 27;49(1):93.

28.

Accuracies of breeding values for dry matter intake using nongenotyped animals and predictor traits in different lactations.

Manzanilla-Pech CIV, Veerkamp RF, de Haas Y, Calus MPL, Ten Napel J.

J Dairy Sci. 2017 Nov;100(11):9103-9114. doi: 10.3168/jds.2017-12741. Epub 2017 Aug 31.

29.

Benefits of Dominance over Additive Models for the Estimation of Average Effects in the Presence of Dominance.

Duenk P, Calus MPL, Wientjes YCJ, Bijma P.

G3 (Bethesda). 2017 Oct 5;7(10):3405-3414. doi: 10.1534/g3.117.300113.

30.

Multi-population Genomic Relationships for Estimating Current Genetic Variances Within and Genetic Correlations Between Populations.

Wientjes YCJ, Bijma P, Vandenplas J, Calus MPL.

Genetics. 2017 Oct;207(2):503-515. doi: 10.1534/genetics.117.300152. Epub 2017 Aug 16.

31.

BOARD INVITED REVIEW: The purebred-crossbred correlation in pigs: A review of theory, estimates, and implications.

Wientjes YCJ, Calus MPL.

J Anim Sci. 2017 Aug;95(8):3467-3478. doi: 10.2527/jas.2017.1669. Review.

PMID:
28805893
32.

Contribution of rare and low-frequency whole-genome sequence variants to complex traits variation in dairy cattle.

Zhang Q, Calus MPL, Guldbrandtsen B, Lund MS, Sahana G.

Genet Sel Evol. 2017 Aug 1;49(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s12711-017-0336-z.

33.

Prediction of the reliability of genomic breeding values for crossbred performance.

Vandenplas J, Windig JJ, Calus MPL.

Genet Sel Evol. 2017 May 12;49(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s12711-017-0318-1.

34.

The Importance of Endophenotypes to Evaluate the Relationship between Genotype and External Phenotype.

Te Pas MF, Madsen O, Calus MP, Smits MA.

Int J Mol Sci. 2017 Feb 22;18(2). pii: E472. doi: 10.3390/ijms18020472. Review.

35.
36.

Genetic changes of survival traits over the past 25 yr in Dutch dairy cattle.

van Pelt ML, Ducrocq V, de Jong G, Calus MPL, Veerkamp RF.

J Dairy Sci. 2016 Dec;99(12):9810-9819. doi: 10.3168/jds.2016-11249. Epub 2016 Sep 28.

37.

Genomic prediction of survival time in a population of brown laying hens showing cannibalistic behavior.

Alemu SW, Calus MP, Muir WM, Peeters K, Vereijken A, Bijma P.

Genet Sel Evol. 2016 Sep 13;48(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s12711-016-0247-4.

38.

Assigning breed origin to alleles in crossbred animals.

Vandenplas J, Calus MP, Sevillano CA, Windig JJ, Bastiaansen JW.

Genet Sel Evol. 2016 Aug 22;48(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s12711-016-0240-y.

39.

Comparison of gene-based rare variant association mapping methods for quantitative traits in a bovine population with complex familial relationships.

Zhang Q, Guldbrandtsen B, Calus MP, Lund MS, Sahana G.

Genet Sel Evol. 2016 Aug 17;48(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s12711-016-0238-5.

40.

Empirical determination of breed-of-origin of alleles in three-breed cross pigs.

Sevillano CA, Vandenplas J, Bastiaansen JW, Calus MP.

Genet Sel Evol. 2016 Aug 4;48(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s12711-016-0234-9.

41.

Conservation priorities for the different lines of Dutch Red and White Friesian cattle change when relationships with other breeds are taken into account.

Hulsegge B, Calus MP, Oldenbroek JK, Windig JJ.

J Anim Breed Genet. 2017 Feb;134(1):69-77. doi: 10.1111/jbg.12233. Epub 2016 Jul 27.

PMID:
27461414
42.

Efficient genomic prediction based on whole-genome sequence data using split-and-merge Bayesian variable selection.

Calus MP, Bouwman AC, Schrooten C, Veerkamp RF.

Genet Sel Evol. 2016 Jun 29;48(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s12711-016-0225-x.

43.

Validation of simultaneous deregression of cow and bull breeding values and derivation of appropriate weights.

Calus MPL, Vandenplas J, Ten Napel J, Veerkamp RF.

J Dairy Sci. 2016 Aug;99(8):6403-6419. doi: 10.3168/jds.2016-11028. Epub 2016 May 18.

44.

Editorial: Genomic selection with numerically small reference populations.

Calus MP.

Animal. 2016 Jun;10(6):1016-7. doi: 10.1017/S1751731116000379. No abstract available.

PMID:
27187156
45.

Accuracy of genomic prediction of purebreds for cross bred performance in pigs.

Hidalgo AM, Bastiaansen JW, Lopes MS, Calus MP, de Koning DJ.

J Anim Breed Genet. 2016 Dec;133(6):443-451. doi: 10.1111/jbg.12214. Epub 2016 Apr 17.

PMID:
27087113
46.

Whole-genome sequence data uncover loss of genetic diversity due to selection.

Eynard SE, Windig JJ, Hiemstra SJ, Calus MP.

Genet Sel Evol. 2016 Apr 14;48:33. doi: 10.1186/s12711-016-0210-4.

47.

Accuracy of genomic prediction using imputed whole-genome sequence data in white layers.

Heidaritabar M, Calus MP, Megens HJ, Vereijken A, Groenen MA, Bastiaansen JW.

J Anim Breed Genet. 2016 Jun;133(3):167-79. doi: 10.1111/jbg.12199. Epub 2016 Jan 18.

PMID:
26776363
48.

Ever-growing data sets pose (new) challenges to genomic prediction models.

Calus MP, Vandenplas J, Ten Napel J.

J Anim Breed Genet. 2015 Dec;132(6):407-8. doi: 10.1111/jbg.12192. No abstract available.

PMID:
26769170
49.

Updating the reference population to achieve constant genomic prediction reliability across generations.

Pszczola M, Calus MP.

Animal. 2016 Jun;10(6):1018-24. doi: 10.1017/S1751731115002785. Epub 2015 Dec 29.

PMID:
26711815
50.

Across population genomic prediction scenarios in which Bayesian variable selection outperforms GBLUP.

van den Berg S, Calus MP, Meuwissen TH, Wientjes YC.

BMC Genet. 2015 Dec 23;16:146. doi: 10.1186/s12863-015-0305-x.

Supplemental Content

Loading ...
Support Center