Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Search results

Items: 1 to 50 of 155

1.

Response to: Commentary on: Bright et al. (2018) Internal validation of STRmix™ - A multi laboratory response to PCAST, Forensic Science International: Genetics, 34: 11-24.

Buckleton JS, Bright JA, Ciecko A, Kruijver M, Mallinder B, Magee A, Malsom S, Moretti T, Weitz S, Bille T, Noël S, Oefelein RH, Peck B, Kalafut T, Taylor DA.

Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2020 Jan;44:102198. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2019.102198. Epub 2019 Nov 4. No abstract available.

PMID:
31710898
2.

The interpretation of mixed DNA profiles from a mother, father, and child trio.

Lin MH, Bright JA, Pugh SN, Buckleton JS.

Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2020 Jan;44:102175. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2019.102175. Epub 2019 Oct 11.

PMID:
31644964
3.

Testing whether stutter and low-level DNA peaks are additive.

Buckleton JS, Lohmueller KE, Inman K, Cheng K, Curran JM, Pugh SN, Bright JA, Taylor DA.

Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2019 Nov;43:102166. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2019.102166. Epub 2019 Sep 24.

PMID:
31586815
4.

The efficacy of DNA mixture to mixture matching.

Bright JA, Taylor D, Kerr Z, Buckleton J, Kruijver M.

Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2019 Jul;41:64-71. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2019.02.020. Epub 2019 Mar 30.

PMID:
30986620
5.

Exploring the probative value of mixed DNA profiles.

Kruijver M, Bright JA, Kelly H, Buckleton J.

Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2019 Jul;41:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2019.03.010. Epub 2019 Mar 16.

PMID:
30913444
6.

Comment on "DNA mixtures interpretation - A proof-of-concept multi-software comparison highlighting different probabilistic methods' performances on challenging samples" by Alladio et al.

Taylor DA, Buckleton JS, Bright JA.

Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2019 May;40:e248-e251. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2019.02.022. Epub 2019 Mar 7. No abstract available.

PMID:
30890320
7.

Inter-sample contamination detection using mixture deconvolution comparison.

Taylor D, Rowe E, Kruijver M, Abarno D, Bright JA, Buckleton J.

Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2019 May;40:160-167. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2019.02.021. Epub 2019 Feb 26.

PMID:
30851600
8.

Interpreting a major component from a mixed DNA profile with an unknown number of minor contributors.

Bille T, Weitz S, Buckleton JS, Bright JA.

Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2019 May;40:150-159. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2019.02.017. Epub 2019 Feb 22.

PMID:
30844683
9.

Corrigendum to "Modelling the dependence structure of Y-STR haplotypes using graphical models" [Forensic Sci. Int.: Genet. 37(1) (2018) 29-36].

Andersen MM, Curran J, de Zoete J, Taylor D, Buckleton J.

Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2019 Jul;41:e30. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2019.01.007. Epub 2019 Jan 22. No abstract available.

PMID:
30773372
10.

STRmix™ collaborative exercise on DNA mixture interpretation.

Bright JA, Cheng K, Kerr Z, McGovern C, Kelly H, Moretti TR, Smith MA, Bieber FR, Budowle B, Coble MD, Alghafri R, Allen PS, Barber A, Beamer V, Buettner C, Russell M, Gehrig C, Hicks T, Charak J, Cheong-Wing K, Ciecko A, Davis CT, Donley M, Pedersen N, Gartside B, Granger D, Greer-Ritzheimer M, Reisinger E, Kennedy J, Grammer E, Kaplan M, Hansen D, Larsen HJ, Laureano A, Li C, Lien E, Lindberg E, Kelly C, Mallinder B, Malsom S, Yacovone-Margetts A, McWhorter A, Prajapati SM, Powell T, Shutler G, Stevenson K, Stonehouse AR, Smith L, Murakami J, Halsing E, Wright D, Clark L, Taylor DA, Buckleton J.

Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2019 May;40:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2019.01.006. Epub 2019 Jan 15.

PMID:
30665115
11.

The effect of varying the number of contributors in the prosecution and alternate propositions.

Buckleton JS, Bright JA, Cheng K, Kelly H, Taylor DA.

Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2019 Jan;38:225-231. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2018.11.011. Epub 2018 Nov 12.

PMID:
30466054
12.

Combating transnational organized crime by linking multiple large ivory seizures to the same dealer.

Wasser SK, Torkelson A, Winters M, Horeaux Y, Tucker S, Otiende MY, Sitam FAT, Buckleton J, Weir BS.

Sci Adv. 2018 Sep 19;4(9):eaat0625. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aat0625. eCollection 2018 Sep.

13.

NIST interlaboratory studies involving DNA mixtures (MIX13): A modern analysis.

Buckleton JS, Bright JA, Cheng K, Budowle B, Coble MD.

Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2018 Nov;37:172-179. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2018.08.014. Epub 2018 Aug 27.

PMID:
30176439
14.

The Probabilistic Genotyping Software STRmix: Utility and Evidence for its Validity.

Buckleton JS, Bright JA, Gittelson S, Moretti TR, Onorato AJ, Bieber FR, Budowle B, Taylor DA.

J Forensic Sci. 2019 Mar;64(2):393-405. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.13898. Epub 2018 Aug 21.

PMID:
30132900
15.

Modelling the dependence structure of Y-STR haplotypes using graphical models.

Andersen MM, Curran J, de Zoete J, Taylor D, Buckleton J.

Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2018 Nov;37:29-36. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2018.07.014. Epub 2018 Jul 22. Erratum in: Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2019 Jul;41:e30.

PMID:
30075394
16.

A response to "Likelihood ratio as weight of evidence: A closer look" by Lund and Iyer.

Gittelson S, Berger CEH, Jackson G, Evett IW, Champod C, Robertson B, Curran JM, Taylor D, Weir BS, Coble MD, Buckleton JS.

Forensic Sci Int. 2018 Jul;288:e15-e19. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2018.05.025. Epub 2018 May 22.

PMID:
29857959
17.

A sensitivity analysis to determine the robustness of STRmix™ with respect to laboratory calibration.

Kelly H, Bright JA, Kruijver M, Cooper S, Taylor D, Duke K, Strong M, Beamer V, Buettner C, Buckleton J.

Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2018 Jul;35:113-122. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2018.04.009. Epub 2018 Apr 27.

PMID:
29727813
18.

Likelihood ratio development for mixed Y-STR profiles.

Taylor D, Curran J, Buckleton J.

Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2018 Jul;35:82-96. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2018.03.006. Epub 2018 Apr 7.

PMID:
29679928
19.

Implementation and validation of an improved allele specific stutter filtering method for electropherogram interpretation.

Kalafut T, Schuerman C, Sutton J, Faris T, Armogida L, Bright JA, Buckleton J, Taylor D.

Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2018 Jul;35:50-56. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2018.03.016. Epub 2018 Mar 31.

PMID:
29660688
20.

Internal validation of STRmix™ - A multi laboratory response to PCAST.

Bright JA, Richards R, Kruijver M, Kelly H, McGovern C, Magee A, McWhorter A, Ciecko A, Peck B, Baumgartner C, Buettner C, McWilliams S, McKenna C, Gallacher C, Mallinder B, Wright D, Johnson D, Catella D, Lien E, O'Connor C, Duncan G, Bundy J, Echard J, Lowe J, Stewart J, Corrado K, Gentile S, Kaplan M, Hassler M, McDonald N, Hulme P, Oefelein RH, Montpetit S, Strong M, Noël S, Malsom S, Myers S, Welti S, Moretti T, McMahon T, Grill T, Kalafut T, Greer-Ritzheimer M, Beamer V, Taylor DA, Buckleton JS.

Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2018 May;34:11-24. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2018.01.003. Epub 2018 Jan 8.

PMID:
29367014
21.

A fully continuous system of DNA profile evidence evaluation that can utilise STR profile data produced under different conditions within a single analysis.

Taylor D, Bright JA, Kelly H, Lin MH, Buckleton J.

Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2017 Nov;31:149-154. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2017.09.002. Epub 2017 Sep 8.

PMID:
28941411
22.

The paradigm shift in DNA profile interpretation.

Bright JA, Taylor D, Gittelson S, Buckleton J.

Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2017 Nov;31:e24-e32. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2017.08.005. Epub 2017 Aug 14. No abstract available.

PMID:
28838643
23.

Finding the way forward for forensic science in the US-A commentary on the PCAST report.

Evett IW, Berger CEH, Buckleton JS, Champod C, Jackson G.

Forensic Sci Int. 2017 Sep;278:16-23. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2017.06.018. Epub 2017 Jun 26. Review.

PMID:
28688344
24.

Internal validation of STRmix™ for the interpretation of single source and mixed DNA profiles.

Moretti TR, Just RS, Kehl SC, Willis LE, Buckleton JS, Bright JA, Taylor DA, Onorato AJ.

Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2017 Jul;29:126-144. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2017.04.004. Epub 2017 Apr 5.

PMID:
28504203
25.

Commentary: A "Source" of Error: Computer Code, Criminal Defendants, and the Constitution.

Taylor DA, Bright JA, Buckleton J.

Front Genet. 2017 Mar 15;8:33. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2017.00033. eCollection 2017. No abstract available.

26.

Likelihood ratio formulae for disputed parentage when the product of conception is trisomic.

Taylor DA, Handt O, Abarno D, Buckleton J.

Int J Legal Med. 2017 Nov;131(6):1513-1521. doi: 10.1007/s00414-017-1573-y. Epub 2017 Mar 23.

PMID:
28337598
27.

The factor of 10 in forensic DNA match probabilities.

Gittelson S, Moretti TR, Onorato AJ, Budowle B, Weir BS, Buckleton J.

Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2017 May;28:178-187. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2017.02.007. Epub 2017 Feb 16.

PMID:
28273509
28.

Importance sampling allows Hd true tests of highly discriminating DNA profiles.

Taylor D, Curran JM, Buckleton J.

Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2017 Mar;27:74-81. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2016.12.004. Epub 2016 Dec 9.

PMID:
28012376
29.

DNA Commission of the International Society for Forensic Genetics: Recommendations on the validation of software programs performing biostatistical calculations for forensic genetics applications.

Coble MD, Buckleton J, Butler JM, Egeland T, Fimmers R, Gill P, Gusmão L, Guttman B, Krawczak M, Morling N, Parson W, Pinto N, Schneider PM, Sherry ST, Willuweit S, Prinz M.

Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2016 Nov;25:191-197. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2016.09.002. Epub 2016 Sep 4.

PMID:
27643465
30.

Population data on the expanded CODIS core STR loci for eleven populations of significance for forensic DNA analyses in the United States.

Moretti TR, Moreno LI, Smerick JB, Pignone ML, Hizon R, Buckleton JS, Bright JA, Onorato AJ.

Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2016 Nov;25:175-181. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2016.07.022. Epub 2016 Aug 3.

31.

Evaluation of forensic DNA mixture evidence: protocol for evaluation, interpretation, and statistical calculations using the combined probability of inclusion.

Bieber FR, Buckleton JS, Budowle B, Butler JM, Coble MD.

BMC Genet. 2016 Aug 31;17(1):125. doi: 10.1186/s12863-016-0429-7.

32.

Authors' Response.

Moretti TR, Budowle B, Buckleton JS.

J Forensic Sci. 2015 Nov;60(6):1669-70. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.12942. No abstract available.

PMID:
27404296
33.

Developmental validation of STRmix™, expert software for the interpretation of forensic DNA profiles.

Bright JA, Taylor D, McGovern C, Cooper S, Russell L, Abarno D, Buckleton J.

Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2016 Jul;23:226-239. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2016.05.007. Epub 2016 May 12.

PMID:
27235797
34.

Population-specific FST values for forensic STR markers: A worldwide survey.

Buckleton J, Curran J, Goudet J, Taylor D, Thiery A, Weir BS.

Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2016 Jul;23:91-100. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2016.03.004. Epub 2016 Mar 22.

35.

Factors affecting peak height variability for short tandem repeat data.

Taylor D, Buckleton J, Bright JA.

Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2016 Mar;21:126-33. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2015.12.009. Epub 2015 Dec 19.

PMID:
26774098
36.

Using probabilistic theory to develop interpretation guidelines for Y-STR profiles.

Taylor D, Bright JA, Buckleton J.

Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2016 Mar;21:22-34. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2015.11.010. Epub 2015 Nov 28.

PMID:
26706152
37.

Validating multiplexes for use in conjunction with modern interpretation strategies.

Taylor D, Bright JA, McGoven C, Hefford C, Kalafut T, Buckleton J.

Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2016 Jan;20:6-19. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2015.09.011. Epub 2015 Sep 26.

PMID:
26433484
38.

Uncertainty in the number of contributors in the proposed new CODIS set.

Coble MD, Bright JA, Buckleton JS, Curran JM.

Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2015 Nov;19:207-211. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2015.07.005. Epub 2015 Jul 17.

PMID:
26275610
39.

A Practical Guide for the Formulation of Propositions in the Bayesian Approach to DNA Evidence Interpretation in an Adversarial Environment.

Gittelson S, Kalafut T, Myers S, Taylor D, Hicks T, Taroni F, Evett IW, Bright JA, Buckleton J.

J Forensic Sci. 2016 Jan;61(1):186-95. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.12907. Epub 2015 Aug 6.

PMID:
26248867
40.

Erratum.

Moretti TR, Budowle B, Buckleton JS.

J Forensic Sci. 2015 Jul;60(4):1114-6. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.12806. Epub 2015 Jun 3. No abstract available.

PMID:
26225719
41.

Testing likelihood ratios produced from complex DNA profiles.

Taylor D, Buckleton J, Evett I.

Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2015 May;16:165-171. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2015.01.008. Epub 2015 Jan 17.

PMID:
25621923
42.

Investigating a common approach to DNA profile interpretation using probabilistic software.

Cooper S, McGovern C, Bright JA, Taylor D, Buckleton J.

Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2015 May;16:121-131. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2014.12.009. Epub 2014 Dec 26.

PMID:
25596557
43.

The effect of wild card designations and rare alleles in forensic DNA database searches.

Tvedebrink T, Bright JA, Buckleton JS, Curran JM, Morling N.

Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2015 May;16:98-104. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2014.12.003. Epub 2014 Dec 16.

PMID:
25576850
44.

Letter to editor in response to editorial by Risinger et al.

Buckleton J, Evett I, Weir B.

Sci Justice. 2014 Dec;54(6):510. doi: 10.1016/j.scijus.2014.07.003. Epub 2014 Aug 27. No abstract available.

PMID:
25498943
45.

Do low template DNA profiles have useful quantitative data?

Taylor D, Buckleton J.

Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2015 May;16:13-16. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2014.11.001. Epub 2014 Nov 15.

PMID:
25474687
46.

The variability in likelihood ratios due to different mechanisms.

Bright JA, Stevenson KE, Curran JM, Buckleton JS.

Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2015 Jan;14:187-90. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2014.10.013. Epub 2014 Oct 25.

PMID:
25450791
47.

A more straightforward derivation of the LR for a database search.

Berger CE, Vergeer P, Buckleton JS.

Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2015 Jan;14:156-60. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2014.09.022. Epub 2014 Oct 5.

PMID:
25450786
48.

A series of recommended tests when validating probabilistic DNA profile interpretation software.

Bright JA, Evett IW, Taylor D, Curran JM, Buckleton J.

Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2015 Jan;14:125-31. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2014.09.019. Epub 2014 Oct 5.

PMID:
25450783
49.

Geographical variation of shoeprint comparison class correspondences.

Benedict I, Corke E, Morgan-Smith R, Maynard P, Curran JM, Buckleton J, Roux C.

Sci Justice. 2014 Sep;54(5):335-7. doi: 10.1016/j.scijus.2014.03.004. Epub 2014 Apr 6.

PMID:
25278194
50.

Interpreting forensic DNA profiling evidence without specifying the number of contributors.

Taylor D, Bright JA, Buckleton J.

Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2014 Nov;13:269-80. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2014.08.014. Epub 2014 Sep 8.

PMID:
25261845

Supplemental Content

Loading ...
Support Center