Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Search results

Items: 1 to 50 of 75

1.

Males increase call frequency, not intensity, in response to noise, revealing no Lombard effect in the little torrent frog.

Zhao L, Sun X, Chen Q, Yang Y, Wang J, Ran J, Brauth SE, Tang Y, Cui J.

Ecol Evol. 2018 Oct 31;8(23):11733-11741. doi: 10.1002/ece3.4625. eCollection 2018 Dec.

2.

Auditory perception exhibits sexual dimorphism and left telencephalic dominance in Xenopus laevis.

Fan Y, Yue X, Xue F, Cui J, Brauth SE, Tang Y, Fang G.

Biol Open. 2018 Dec 3;7(12). pii: bio035956. doi: 10.1242/bio.035956.

3.

Auditory sensitivity exhibits sexual dimorphism and seasonal plasticity in music frogs.

Yang P, Xue F, Cui J, Brauth SE, Tang Y, Fang G.

J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2018 Dec;204(12):1029-1044. doi: 10.1007/s00359-018-1301-1. Epub 2018 Oct 30.

PMID:
30377768
4.

The right thalamus may play an important role in anesthesia-awakening regulation in frogs.

Fan Y, Yue X, Xue F, Brauth SE, Tang Y, Fang G.

PeerJ. 2018 Mar 15;6:e4516. doi: 10.7717/peerj.4516. eCollection 2018.

5.

Auditory neural networks involved in attention modulation prefer biologically significant sounds and exhibit sexual dimorphism in anurans.

Xue F, Yue X, Fan Y, Cui J, Brauth SE, Tang Y, Fang G.

J Exp Biol. 2018 Mar 9;221(Pt 5). pii: jeb167775. doi: 10.1242/jeb.167775.

6.

Correction to: Sometimes noise is beneficial: stream noise informs vocal communication in the little torrent frog Amolops torrentis.

Zhao L, Zhu B, Wang J, Brauth SE, Tang Y, Cui J.

J Ethol. 2018;36(2):217. doi: 10.1007/s10164-017-0537-5. Epub 2017 Dec 1.

7.

Sometimes noise is beneficial: stream noise informs vocal communication in the little torrent frog Amolops torrentis.

Zhao L, Zhu B, Wang J, Brauth SE, Tang Y, Cui J.

J Ethol. 2017;35(3):259-267. doi: 10.1007/s10164-017-0515-y. Epub 2017 Apr 18. Erratum in: J Ethol. 2018;36(2):217.

8.

Competitive pressures affect sexual signal complexity in Kurixalus odontotarsus: insights into the evolution of compound calls.

Zhu B, Wang J, Sun Z, Yang Y, Wang T, Brauth SE, Tang Y, Cui J.

Biol Open. 2017 Dec 15;6(12):1913-1918. doi: 10.1242/bio.028928.

9.

Male-male competition and female choice are differentially affected by male call acoustics in the serrate-legged small treefrog, Kurixalus odontotarsus.

Zhu B, Wang J, Zhao L, Chen Q, Sun Z, Yang Y, Brauth SE, Tang Y, Cui J.

PeerJ. 2017 Oct 31;5:e3980. doi: 10.7717/peerj.3980. eCollection 2017.

10.

The First Call Note Plays a Crucial Role in Frog Vocal Communication.

Yue X, Fan Y, Xue F, Brauth SE, Tang Y, Fang G.

Sci Rep. 2017 Aug 31;7(1):10128. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-09870-2.

11.

The thermal background determines how the infrared and visual systems interact in pit vipers.

Chen Q, Liu Y, Brauth SE, Fang G, Tang Y.

J Exp Biol. 2017 Sep 1;220(Pt 17):3103-3109. doi: 10.1242/jeb.155382.

12.

An exception to the matched filter hypothesis: A mismatch of male call frequency and female best hearing frequency in a torrent frog.

Zhao L, Wang J, Yang Y, Zhu B, Brauth SE, Tang Y, Cui J.

Ecol Evol. 2016 Dec 20;7(1):419-428. doi: 10.1002/ece3.2621. eCollection 2017 Jan.

13.

Effect of the Level of Anesthesia on the Auditory Brainstem Response in the Emei Music Frog (Babina daunchina).

Cui J, Zhu B, Fang G, Smith E, Brauth SE, Tang Y.

PLoS One. 2017 Jan 5;12(1):e0169449. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169449. eCollection 2017.

14.

A lateralized functional auditory network is involved in anuran sexual selection.

Xue F, Fang G, Yue X, Zhao E, Brauth SE, Tang Y.

J Biosci. 2016 Dec;41(4):713-726.

15.

Resting-state brain networks revealed by granger causal connectivity in frogs.

Xue F, Fang G, Yue X, Zhao E, Brauth SE, Tang Y.

Neuroscience. 2016 Oct 15;334:332-340. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2016.08.015. Epub 2016 Aug 13.

PMID:
27530699
16.

Bigger Is Not Always Better: Females Prefer Males of Mean Body Size in Philautus odontotarsus.

Zhu B, Wang J, Zhao L, Sun Z, Brauth SE, Tang Y, Cui J.

PLoS One. 2016 Feb 22;11(2):e0149879. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149879. eCollection 2016.

17.

Sound Classification and Call Discrimination Are Decoded in Order as Revealed by Event-Related Potential Components in Frogs.

Fang G, Yang P, Xue F, Cui J, Brauth SE, Tang Y.

Brain Behav Evol. 2015;86(3-4):232-45. doi: 10.1159/000441215. Epub 2015 Nov 28.

PMID:
26613526
18.

Core and Shell Song Systems Unique to the Parrot Brain.

Chakraborty M, Wall√łe S, Nedergaard S, Fridel EE, Dabelsteen T, Pakkenberg B, Bertelsen MF, Dorrestein GM, Brauth SE, Durand SE, Jarvis ED.

PLoS One. 2015 Jun 24;10(6):e0118496. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0118496. eCollection 2015.

19.

The biological significance of acoustic stimuli determines ear preference in the music frog.

Xue F, Fang G, Yang P, Zhao E, Brauth SE, Tang Y.

J Exp Biol. 2015 Mar;218(Pt 5):740-7. doi: 10.1242/jeb.114694.

20.

Right ear advantage for vocal communication in frogs results from both structural asymmetry and attention modulation.

Fang G, Xue F, Yang P, Cui J, Brauth SE, Tang Y.

Behav Brain Res. 2014 Jun 1;266:77-84. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2014.02.042. Epub 2014 Mar 5.

PMID:
24613236
21.

Electroencephalographic signals synchronize with behaviors and are sexually dimorphic during the light-dark cycle in reproductive frogs.

Yang P, Fang G, Xue F, Cui J, Brauth SE, Tang Y.

J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2014 Feb;200(2):117-27. doi: 10.1007/s00359-013-0866-y. Epub 2013 Dec 12.

PMID:
24337372
22.

Male vocal competition is dynamic and strongly affected by social contexts in music frogs.

Fang G, Jiang F, Yang P, Cui J, Brauth SE, Tang Y.

Anim Cogn. 2014 Mar;17(2):483-94. doi: 10.1007/s10071-013-0680-5. Epub 2013 Sep 13.

PMID:
24030652
23.

Mating signals indicating sexual receptiveness induce unique spatio-temporal EEG theta patterns in an anuran species.

Fang G, Yang P, Cui J, Yao D, Brauth SE, Tang Y.

PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e52364. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0052364. Epub 2012 Dec 21.

24.

Reduced performance of prey targeting in pit vipers with contralaterally occluded infrared and visual senses.

Chen Q, Deng H, Brauth SE, Ding L, Tang Y.

PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e34989. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0034989. Epub 2012 May 14.

25.

Rapid contact call-driven induction of NR2A and NR2B NMDA subunit mRNAs in the auditory thalamus of the budgerigar (Melopsittacus undulatus).

Brauth SE, Liang W, Tang Y, Galdzicka E, Hall WS.

Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2007 Jul;88(1):33-9. Epub 2007 Apr 20.

PMID:
17449285
26.
27.

Feeding and contact call stimulation both induce zenk and cfos expression in a higher order telencephalic area necessary for vocal learning in budgerigars.

Brauth SE, Liang W, Beru Y, Roberts TF, Hall WS.

Behav Brain Res. 2006 Apr 3;168(2):331-8. Epub 2005 Nov 23.

PMID:
16310258
28.

Sexual dimorphism of vocal control nuclei in budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus) revealed with Nissl and NADPH-d staining.

Brauth SE, Liang W, Amateau SK, Roberts TF.

J Comp Neurol. 2005 Mar 28;484(1):15-27. Erratum in: J Comp Neurol. 2005 May 23;486(1):98. Robert, Todd F [corrected to Roberts, Todd F].

PMID:
15717302
29.

Contact call-driven zenk mRNA expression in the brain of the budgerigar (Melopsittacus undulatus).

Brauth SE, Tang YZ, Liang W, Roberts TF.

Brain Res Mol Brain Res. 2003 Sep 10;117(1):97-103.

PMID:
14499486
30.

Organization of the avian basal forebrain: chemical anatomy in the parrot (Melopsittacus undulatus).

Roberts TF, Hall WS, Brauth SE.

J Comp Neurol. 2002 Dec 23;454(4):383-408.

PMID:
12455005
32.

Distribution of iron in the parrot brain: conserved (pallidal) and derived (nigral) labeling patterns.

Roberts TF, Brauth SE, Hall WS.

Brain Res. 2001 Dec 7;921(1-2):138-49.

PMID:
11720720
33.
34.
36.

Telencephalic nuclei control late but not early nestling calls in the budgerigar.

Heaton JT, Brauth SE.

Behav Brain Res. 2000 Apr;109(1):129-35.

PMID:
10699664
37.
38.

Cytoarchitecture of vocal control nuclei in nestling budgerigars: relationships to call development.

Hall WS, Cookson KK, Heaton JT, Roberts TF, Shea SD, Amateau SK, Brauth SE.

Brain Behav Evol. 1999;53(4):198-226.

PMID:
10343086
40.

The role of contact calls in the social behavior of the budgerigar (Melopsittacus undulatus).

Shea SD, Heaton KJ, Heaton JT, Hall WS, Brauth SE.

Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1997 Jan 15;807:571-3. No abstract available.

PMID:
9071401
41.

Functional anatomy of forebrain vocal control pathways in the budgerigar (Melopsittacus undulatus).

Brauth SE, Heaton JT, Shea SD, Durand SE, Hall WS.

Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1997 Jan 15;807:368-85. Review.

PMID:
9071364
42.

Audio-vocal learning in budgerigars.

Hall WS, Cookson KK, Heaton JT, Roberts T, Shea SD, Brauth SE.

Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1997 Jan 15;807:352-67. Review. No abstract available.

PMID:
9071363
43.

Vocal control pathways through the anterior forebrain of a parrot (Melopsittacus undulatus).

Durand SE, Heaton JT, Amateau SK, Brauth SE.

J Comp Neurol. 1997 Jan 13;377(2):179-206.

PMID:
8986880
44.
45.

Effect of syringeal denervation in the budgerigar (Melopsittacus undulatus): the role of the syrinx in call production.

Heaton JT, Farabaugh SM, Brauth SE.

Neurobiol Learn Mem. 1995 Jul;64(1):68-82.

PMID:
7582814
46.

Covariation of binaural, concurrently-measured spontaneous otoacoustic emissions.

Penner MJ, Brauth SE, Jastreboff PJ.

Hear Res. 1994 Mar;73(2):190-4.

PMID:
8188547
48.

Functional anatomy of forebrain auditory pathways in the budgerigar (Melopsittacus undulatus).

Brauth SE, Heaton JT, Durand SE, Liang W, Hall WS.

Brain Behav Evol. 1994;44(4-5):210-33. Review.

PMID:
7842282
49.

Auditory projections to the anterior telencephalon in the budgerigar (Melopsittacus undulatus).

Hall WS, Cohen PL, Brauth SE.

Brain Behav Evol. 1993;41(2):97-116.

PMID:
8439806
50.

Supplemental Content

Loading ...
Support Center