Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Search results

Items: 1 to 50 of 123

1.

Models with indirect genetic effects depending on group sizes: a simulation study assessing the precision of the estimates of the dilution parameter.

Heidaritabar M, Bijma P, Janss L, Bortoluzzi C, Nielsen HM, Madsen P, Ask B, Christensen OF.

Genet Sel Evol. 2019 May 30;51(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s12711-019-0466-6.

2.

A genome-wide association study for susceptibility and infectivity of Holstein Friesian dairy cattle to digital dermatitis.

Biemans F, de Jong MCM, Bijma P.

J Dairy Sci. 2019 Jul;102(7):6248-6262. doi: 10.3168/jds.2018-15876. Epub 2019 May 15.

3.

Can breeders solve mortality due to feather pecking in laying hens?

Ellen ED, Bijma P.

Poult Sci. 2019 May 8. pii: pez250. doi: 10.3382/ps/pez250. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
31065706
4.

Estimating the purebred-crossbred genetic correlation of body weight in broiler chickens with pedigree or genomic relationships.

Duenk P, Calus MPL, Wientjes YCJ, Breen VP, Henshall JM, Hawken R, Bijma P.

Genet Sel Evol. 2019 Feb 19;51(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s12711-019-0447-9.

5.

Required properties for markers used to calculate unbiased estimates of the genetic correlation between populations.

Wientjes YCJ, Calus MPL, Duenk P, Bijma P.

Genet Sel Evol. 2018 Dec 14;50(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s12711-018-0434-6.

6.

Derivation of the economic value of R0 for macroparasitic diseases and application to sea lice in salmon.

Janssen K, Komen H, Saatkamp HW, de Jong MCM, Bijma P.

Genet Sel Evol. 2018 Oct 3;50(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s12711-018-0418-6.

7.

Value of the Dutch Holstein Friesian germplasm collection to increase genetic variability and improve genetic merit.

Doekes HP, Veerkamp RF, Bijma P, Hiemstra SJ, Windig J.

J Dairy Sci. 2018 Nov;101(11):10022-10033. doi: 10.3168/jds.2018-15217. Epub 2018 Sep 13.

8.

The genetic architecture of socially-affected traits: a GWAS for direct and indirect genetic effects on survival time in laying hens showing cannibalism.

Brinker T, Bijma P, Vereijken A, Ellen ED.

Genet Sel Evol. 2018 Jul 23;50(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s12711-018-0409-7.

9.

Sensitivity of the breeding values for growth rate and worm egg count to environmental worm burden in Australian Merino sheep.

Hollema BL, Bijma P, van der Werf JHJ.

J Anim Breed Genet. 2018 Oct;135(5):357-365. doi: 10.1111/jbg.12349. Epub 2018 Jul 11.

PMID:
29993145
10.

Indirect Genetic Effects for Growth in Pigs Affect Behaviour and Weight Around Weaning.

Camerlink I, Ursinus WW, Bartels AC, Bijma P, Bolhuis JE.

Behav Genet. 2018 Sep;48(5):413-420. doi: 10.1007/s10519-018-9911-5. Epub 2018 Jun 19.

11.

Maternal Effects in a Wild Songbird Are Environmentally Plastic but Only Marginally Alter the Rate of Adaptation.

Ramakers JJC, Cobben MMP, Bijma P, Reed TE, Visser ME, Gienapp P.

Am Nat. 2018 May;191(5):E144-E158. doi: 10.1086/696847. Epub 2018 Mar 26.

PMID:
29693435
12.

Trends in genome-wide and region-specific genetic diversity in the Dutch-Flemish Holstein-Friesian breeding program from 1986 to 2015.

Doekes HP, Veerkamp RF, Bijma P, Hiemstra SJ, Windig JJ.

Genet Sel Evol. 2018 Apr 11;50(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s12711-018-0385-y.

13.

Modelling the co-evolution of indirect genetic effects and inherited variability.

Marjanovic J, Mulder HA, Rönnegård L, Bijma P.

Heredity (Edinb). 2018 Dec;121(6):631-647. doi: 10.1038/s41437-018-0068-z. Epub 2018 Mar 28.

14.

Digital Dermatitis in dairy cattle: The contribution of different disease classes to transmission.

Biemans F, Bijma P, Boots NM, de Jong MCM.

Epidemics. 2018 Jun;23:76-84. doi: 10.1016/j.epidem.2017.12.007. Epub 2017 Dec 22.

15.

Benefits of Dominance over Additive Models for the Estimation of Average Effects in the Presence of Dominance.

Duenk P, Calus MPL, Wientjes YCJ, Bijma P.

G3 (Bethesda). 2017 Oct 5;7(10):3405-3414. doi: 10.1534/g3.117.300113.

16.

Multi-population Genomic Relationships for Estimating Current Genetic Variances Within and Genetic Correlations Between Populations.

Wientjes YCJ, Bijma P, Vandenplas J, Calus MPL.

Genetics. 2017 Oct;207(2):503-515. doi: 10.1534/genetics.117.300152. Epub 2017 Aug 16.

17.

A model to estimate effects of SNPs on host susceptibility and infectivity for an endemic infectious disease.

Biemans F, de Jong MCM, Bijma P.

Genet Sel Evol. 2017 Jun 30;49(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s12711-017-0327-0.

18.

The early-life environment of a pig shapes the phenotypes of its social partners in adulthood.

Canario L, Lundeheim N, Bijma P.

Heredity (Edinb). 2017 Jun;118(6):534-541. doi: 10.1038/hdy.2017.3. Epub 2017 Mar 22.

19.

Response to Selection in Finite Locus Models with Nonadditive Effects.

Esfandyari H, Henryon M, Berg P, Thomasen JR, Bijma P, Sørensen AC.

J Hered. 2017 May 1;108(3):318-327. doi: 10.1093/jhered/esw123.

PMID:
28082328
20.

Estimation of total genetic effects for survival time in crossbred laying hens showing cannibalism, using pedigree or genomic information.

Brinker T, Raymond B, Bijma P, Vereijken A, Ellen ED.

J Anim Breed Genet. 2017 Feb;134(1):60-68. doi: 10.1111/jbg.12245. Epub 2016 Nov 23.

PMID:
27878876
21.

Genomic prediction of survival time in a population of brown laying hens showing cannibalistic behavior.

Alemu SW, Calus MP, Muir WM, Peeters K, Vereijken A, Bijma P.

Genet Sel Evol. 2016 Sep 13;48(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s12711-016-0247-4.

22.

Genetic parameters for uniformity of harvest weight and body size traits in the GIFT strain of Nile tilapia.

Marjanovic J, Mulder HA, Khaw HL, Bijma P.

Genet Sel Evol. 2016 Jun 10;48(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s12711-016-0218-9.

23.

Genomic prediction of crossbred performance based on purebred Landrace and Yorkshire data using a dominance model.

Esfandyari H, Bijma P, Henryon M, Christensen OF, Sørensen AC.

Genet Sel Evol. 2016 Jun 8;48(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s12711-016-0220-2.

24.

Direct and indirect genetic effects in life-history traits of flour beetles (Tribolium castaneum).

Ellen ED, Peeters K, Verhoeven M, Gols R, Harvey JA, Wade MJ, Dicke M, Bijma P.

Evolution. 2016 Jan;70(1):207-17. doi: 10.1111/evo.12835. Epub 2016 Jan 5.

PMID:
26660947
25.

Genome-wide association study reveals novel loci for litter size and its variability in a Large White pig population.

Sell-Kubiak E, Duijvesteijn N, Lopes MS, Janss LL, Knol EF, Bijma P, Mulder HA.

BMC Genomics. 2015 Dec 9;16:1049. doi: 10.1186/s12864-015-2273-y.

26.

An Equation to Predict the Accuracy of Genomic Values by Combining Data from Multiple Traits, Populations, or Environments.

Wientjes YC, Bijma P, Veerkamp RF, Calus MP.

Genetics. 2016 Feb;202(2):799-823. doi: 10.1534/genetics.115.183269. Epub 2015 Dec 4.

27.

Genetic analysis of infectious diseases: estimating gene effects for susceptibility and infectivity.

Anche MT, Bijma P, De Jong MC.

Genet Sel Evol. 2015 Nov 4;47:85. doi: 10.1186/s12711-015-0163-z.

28.

A crossbred reference population can improve the response to genomic selection for crossbred performance.

Esfandyari H, Sørensen AC, Bijma P.

Genet Sel Evol. 2015 Sep 29;47:76. doi: 10.1186/s12711-015-0155-z.

29.

Predicting direct and indirect breeding values for survival time in laying hens using repeated measures.

Brinker T, Ellen ED, Veerkamp RF, Bijma P.

Genet Sel Evol. 2015 Sep 28;47:75. doi: 10.1186/s12711-015-0152-2.

30.

Reliability of pedigree-based and genomic evaluations in selected populations.

Gorjanc G, Bijma P, Hickey JM.

Genet Sel Evol. 2015 Aug 14;47:65. doi: 10.1186/s12711-015-0145-1.

31.

Evaluation of genomic selection for replacement strategies using selection index theory.

Calus MP, Bijma P, Veerkamp RF.

J Dairy Sci. 2015 Sep;98(9):6499-509. doi: 10.3168/jds.2014-9192. Epub 2015 Jul 2.

32.

Comparison of methods to study uniformity of traits: Application to birth weight in pigs.

Sell-Kubiak E, Bijma P, Knol EF, Mulder HA.

J Anim Sci. 2015 Mar;93(3):900-11. doi: 10.2527/jas.2014-8313.

PMID:
26020868
33.

Estimation of indirect genetic effects in group-housed mink (Neovison vison) should account for systematic interactions either due to kin or sex.

Alemu SW, Berg P, Janss L, Bijma P.

J Anim Breed Genet. 2016 Feb;133(1):43-50. doi: 10.1111/jbg.12163. Epub 2015 Apr 20.

PMID:
25900536
34.

Predicting heterosis for egg production traits in crossbred offspring of individual White Leghorn sires using genome-wide SNP data.

Amuzu-Aweh EN, Bovenhuis H, de Koning DJ, Bijma P.

Genet Sel Evol. 2015 Apr 3;47:27. doi: 10.1186/s12711-015-0088-6.

35.

Maximizing crossbred performance through purebred genomic selection.

Esfandyari H, Sørensen AC, Bijma P.

Genet Sel Evol. 2015 Mar 14;47:16. doi: 10.1186/s12711-015-0099-3.

36.

Empirical and deterministic accuracies of across-population genomic prediction.

Wientjes YC, Veerkamp RF, Bijma P, Bovenhuis H, Schrooten C, Calus MP.

Genet Sel Evol. 2015 Feb 6;47:5. doi: 10.1186/s12711-014-0086-0.

37.

The prospects of selection for social genetic effects to improve welfare and productivity in livestock.

Ellen ED, Rodenburg TB, Albers GA, Bolhuis JE, Camerlink I, Duijvesteijn N, Knol EF, Muir WM, Peeters K, Reimert I, Sell-Kubiak E, van Arendonk JA, Visscher J, Bijma P.

Front Genet. 2014 Nov 11;5:377. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2014.00377. eCollection 2014. Review.

38.

Standard error of the genetic correlation: how much data do we need to estimate a purebred-crossbred genetic correlation?

Bijma P, Bastiaansen JW.

Genet Sel Evol. 2014 Nov 19;46:79. doi: 10.1186/s12711-014-0079-z.

39.

Response to commentary on "Examples of overlooking common sense solutions: the domestication gene and selection against mortality".

Bijma P, Muir WM, Ellen ED.

Front Genet. 2014 Sep 30;5:343. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2014.00343. eCollection 2014. No abstract available.

40.

Methods to estimate breeding values in honey bees.

Brascamp EW, Bijma P.

Genet Sel Evol. 2014 Sep 19;46:53. doi: 10.1186/s12711-014-0053-9.

41.

Indirect genetic effects for growth rate in domestic pigs alter aggressive and manipulative biting behaviour.

Camerlink I, Ursinus WW, Bijma P, Kemp B, Bolhuis JE.

Behav Genet. 2015 Jan;45(1):117-26. doi: 10.1007/s10519-014-9671-9. Epub 2014 Sep 17.

42.

Boar taint in entire male pigs: a genomewide association study for direct and indirect genetic effects on androstenone.

Duijvesteijn N, Knol EF, Bijma P.

J Anim Sci. 2014 Oct;92(10):4319-28. doi: 10.2527/jas.2014-7863. Epub 2014 Aug 22.

PMID:
25149343
43.

Indirect genetic effects and inbreeding: consequences of BLUP selection for socially affected traits on rate of inbreeding.

Khaw HL, Ponzoni RW, Bijma P.

Genet Sel Evol. 2014 Jun 24;46:39. doi: 10.1186/1297-9686-46-39.

44.

Plumage condition in laying hens: genetic parameters for direct and indirect effects in two purebred layer lines.

Brinker T, Bijma P, Visscher J, Rodenburg TB, Ellen ED.

Genet Sel Evol. 2014 May 29;46:33. doi: 10.1186/1297-9686-46-33.

45.

Indirect genetic effects contribute substantially to heritable variation in aggression-related traits in group-housed mink (Neovison vison).

Alemu SW, Bijma P, Møller SH, Janss L, Berg P.

Genet Sel Evol. 2014 May 7;46:30. doi: 10.1186/1297-9686-46-30. Erratum in: Genet Sel Evol. 2014;46:70.

46.

On the definition and utilization of heritable variation among hosts in reproduction ratio R0 for infectious diseases.

Anche MT, de Jong MC, Bijma P.

Heredity (Edinb). 2014 Oct;113(4):364-74. doi: 10.1038/hdy.2014.38. Epub 2014 May 14.

47.

Modelling of feather pecking behavior in beak-trimmed and non-beak-trimmed crossbred laying hens: variance component and trait-based approach.

Sun Y, Ellen ED, van der Poel JJ, Parmentier HK, Bijma P.

Poult Sci. 2014 Apr;93(4):773-83. doi: 10.3382/ps.2013-03367.

PMID:
24706953
48.

Growth performance and carcass traits in pigs selected for indirect genetic effects on growth rate in two environments.

Camerlink I, Bolhuis JE, Duijvesteijn N, van Arendonk JA, Bijma P.

J Anim Sci. 2014 Jun;92(6):2612-9. doi: 10.2527/jas.2013-7220. Epub 2014 Mar 26.

PMID:
24671587
49.

Direct and social genetic parameters for growth and fin damage traits in Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua).

Nielsen HM, Monsen BB, Odegård J, Bijma P, Damsgård B, Toften H, Olesen I.

Genet Sel Evol. 2014 Jan 24;46:5. doi: 10.1186/1297-9686-46-5.

50.

Erratum to: indirect genetic effects contribute substantially to heritable variation in aggression-related traits in group-housed mink (Neovison vison).

Alemu SW, Bijma P, Møller SH, Janss L, Berg P.

Genet Sel Evol. 2014 Oct 15;46:70. doi: 10.1186/s12711-014-0070-8. No abstract available.

Supplemental Content

Support Center