Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Search results

Items: 1 to 50 of 78

1.

Population genomics of the facultatively asexual duckweed Spirodela polyrhiza.

Ho EKH, Bartkowska M, Wright SI, Agrawal AF.

New Phytol. 2019 Nov;224(3):1361-1371. doi: 10.1111/nph.16056. Epub 2019 Aug 7.

PMID:
31298732
2.

Testing for local adaptation in adult male and female fitness among populations evolved under different mate competition regimes.

Yun L, Bayoumi M, Yang S, Chen PJ, Rundle HD, Agrawal AF.

Evolution. 2019 Aug;73(8):1604-1616. doi: 10.1111/evo.13787. Epub 2019 Jun 26.

PMID:
31206649
3.

Ecological specialization in populations adapted to constant versus heterogeneous environments.

Wang A, Singh A, Huang Y, Agrawal AF.

Evolution. 2019 Jun;73(6):1309-1317. doi: 10.1111/evo.13725. Epub 2019 Apr 3.

PMID:
30912125
4.

Sexual Conflict and Sexually Transmitted Infections (STIs): Coevolution of Sexually Antagonistic Host Traits with an STI.

Wardlaw AM, Agrawal AF.

Am Nat. 2019 Jan;193(1):E1-E14. doi: 10.1086/700564. Epub 2018 Nov 29.

PMID:
30624111
5.

An experimental test of the mutation-selection balance model for the maintenance of genetic variance in fitness components.

Sharp NP, Agrawal AF.

Proc Biol Sci. 2018 Nov 7;285(1890). pii: 20181864. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2018.1864.

6.

The effects of male harm vary with female quality and environmental complexity in Drosophila melanogaster.

MacPherson A, Yun L, Barrera TS, Agrawal AF, Rundle HD.

Biol Lett. 2018 Aug;14(8). pii: 20180443. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2018.0443.

7.

Coalescence and Linkage Disequilibrium in Facultatively Sexual Diploids.

Hartfield M, Wright SI, Agrawal AF.

Genetics. 2018 Oct;210(2):683-701. doi: 10.1534/genetics.118.301244. Epub 2018 Aug 10.

8.

The Genomics of Sexual Conflict.

Rowe L, Chenoweth SF, Agrawal AF.

Am Nat. 2018 Aug;192(2):274-286. doi: 10.1086/698198. Epub 2018 Jun 11.

PMID:
30016158
9.

Mutation accumulation in selfing populations under fluctuating selection.

Ho EKH, Agrawal AF.

Evolution. 2018 Sep;72(9):1759-1772. doi: 10.1111/evo.13553. Epub 2018 Aug 1.

PMID:
30004122
10.

Competition for mates and the improvement of nonsexual fitness.

Yun L, Chen PJ, Kwok KE, Angell CS, Rundle HD, Agrawal AF.

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Jun 26;115(26):6762-6767. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1805435115. Epub 2018 Jun 11.

11.

Mutation accumulation in populations of varying size: large effect mutations cause most mutational decline in the rotifer Brachionus calyciflorus under UV-C radiation.

Luijckx P, Ho EKH, Stanić A, Agrawal AF.

J Evol Biol. 2018 Jun;31(6):924-932. doi: 10.1111/jeb.13282. Epub 2018 May 4.

PMID:
29672987
12.

Environmental complexity and the purging of deleterious alleles.

Singh A, Agrawal AF, Rundle HD.

Evolution. 2017 Nov;71(11):2714-2720. doi: 10.1111/evo.13334. Epub 2017 Sep 20.

PMID:
28840604
13.

The physical environment mediates male harm and its effect on selection in females.

Yun L, Chen PJ, Singh A, Agrawal AF, Rundle HD.

Proc Biol Sci. 2017 Jul 12;284(1858). pii: 20170424. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2017.0424.

14.

Aging asexual lineages and the evolutionary maintenance of sex.

Ho EKH, Agrawal AF.

Evolution. 2017 Jul;71(7):1865-1875. doi: 10.1111/evo.13260. Epub 2017 May 12.

PMID:
28444897
15.

Higher rates of sex evolve during adaptation to more complex environments.

Luijckx P, Ho EK, Gasim M, Chen S, Stanic A, Yanchus C, Kim YS, Agrawal AF.

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Jan 17;114(3):534-539. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1604072114. Epub 2017 Jan 4.

16.

Experimental Evolution of Gene Expression and Plasticity in Alternative Selective Regimes.

Huang Y, Agrawal AF.

PLoS Genet. 2016 Sep 23;12(9):e1006336. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006336. eCollection 2016 Sep.

17.

Does Genetic Variation Maintained by Environmental Heterogeneity Facilitate Adaptation to Novel Selection?

Huang Y, Tran I, Agrawal AF.

Am Nat. 2016 Jul;188(1):27-37. doi: 10.1086/686889. Epub 2016 May 20.

PMID:
27322119
18.

Low Genetic Quality Alters Key Dimensions of the Mutational Spectrum.

Sharp NP, Agrawal AF.

PLoS Biol. 2016 Mar 25;14(3):e1002419. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002419. eCollection 2016 Mar.

19.

The decline in fitness with inbreeding: evidence for negative dominance-by-dominance epistasis in Drosophila melanogaster.

Sharp NP, Agrawal AF.

J Evol Biol. 2016 Apr;29(4):857-64. doi: 10.1111/jeb.12815. Epub 2016 Jan 14.

20.

Coalescent Times and Patterns of Genetic Diversity in Species with Facultative Sex: Effects of Gene Conversion, Population Structure, and Heterogeneity.

Hartfield M, Wright SI, Agrawal AF.

Genetics. 2016 Jan;202(1):297-312. doi: 10.1534/genetics.115.178004. Epub 2015 Nov 19.

21.

Coalescence with Background and Balancing Selection in Systems with Bi- and Uniparental Reproduction: Contrasting Partial Asexuality and Selfing.

Agrawal AF, Hartfield M.

Genetics. 2016 Jan;202(1):313-26. doi: 10.1534/genetics.115.181024. Epub 2015 Nov 19.

22.

Evolutionary biology: Infection elevates diversity.

Agrawal AF.

Nature. 2015 Sep 24;525(7570):464-5. doi: 10.1038/525464a. No abstract available.

PMID:
26399826
23.

Quantitative genetic variance in experimental fly populations evolving with or without environmental heterogeneity.

Huang Y, Stinchcombe JR, Agrawal AF.

Evolution. 2015 Oct;69(10):2735-46. doi: 10.1111/evo.12771. Epub 2015 Sep 28.

PMID:
26362112
24.

Variation in the strength of inbreeding depression across environments: effects of stress and density dependence.

Yun L, Agrawal AF.

Evolution. 2014 Dec;68(12):3599-606. doi: 10.1111/evo.12527. Epub 2014 Oct 22.

PMID:
25213285
25.

Genome-wide patterns of genetic variation within and among alternative selective regimes.

Huang Y, Wright SI, Agrawal AF.

PLoS Genet. 2014 Aug 7;10(8):e1004527. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004527. eCollection 2014 Aug.

26.

Selfing, adaptation and background selection in finite populations.

Kamran-Disfani A, Agrawal AF.

J Evol Biol. 2014 Jul;27(7):1360-71. doi: 10.1111/jeb.12343. Epub 2014 Mar 7.

27.

Remating and sperm competition in replicate populations of Drosophila melanogaster adapted to alternative environments.

Arbuthnott D, Agrawal AF, Rundle HD.

PLoS One. 2014 Feb 25;9(2):e90207. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0090207. eCollection 2014.

28.

The ecology of sexual conflict: ecologically dependent parallel evolution of male harm and female resistance in Drosophila melanogaster.

Arbuthnott D, Dutton EM, Agrawal AF, Rundle HD.

Ecol Lett. 2014 Feb;17(2):221-8. doi: 10.1111/ele.12222. Epub 2013 Nov 11.

PMID:
24215269
29.

Sensitivity of the distribution of mutational fitness effects to environment, genetic background, and adaptedness: a case study with Drosophila.

Wang AD, Sharp NP, Agrawal AF.

Evolution. 2014 Mar;68(3):840-53. doi: 10.1111/evo.12309. Epub 2013 Dec 6.

PMID:
24206451
30.

The condition dependency of fitness in males and females: the fitness consequences of juvenile diet assessed in environments differing in key adult resources.

Zikovitz AE, Agrawal AF.

Evolution. 2013 Oct;67(10):2849-60. doi: 10.1111/evo.12170. Epub 2013 Jun 17.

PMID:
24094338
31.

Male-biased fitness effects of spontaneous mutations in Drosophila melanogaster.

Sharp NP, Agrawal AF.

Evolution. 2013 Apr;67(4):1189-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2012.01834.x. Epub 2012 Nov 29.

PMID:
23550766
32.

The effects of selective history and environmental heterogeneity on inbreeding depression in experimental populations of Drosophila melanogaster.

Long TA, Rowe L, Agrawal AF.

Am Nat. 2013 Apr;181(4):532-44. doi: 10.1086/669675. Epub 2013 Mar 5.

PMID:
23535617
33.

Higher rates of sex evolve under K-selection.

Becks L, Agrawal AF.

J Evol Biol. 2013 Apr;26(4):900-5. doi: 10.1111/jeb.12110. Epub 2013 Mar 15.

34.

The effects of competition on the strength and softness of selection.

Ho EK, Agrawal AF.

J Evol Biol. 2012 Dec;25(12):2537-46. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2012.02618.x. Epub 2012 Oct 1.

35.

DNA repair pathway choice is influenced by the health of Drosophila melanogaster.

Wang AD, Agrawal AF.

Genetics. 2012 Oct;192(2):361-70. doi: 10.1534/genetics.112.143321. Epub 2012 Jul 18.

36.

Relative effectiveness of mating success and sperm competition at eliminating deleterious mutations in Drosophila melanogaster.

Clark SC, Sharp NP, Rowe L, Agrawal AF.

PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e37351. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0037351. Epub 2012 May 25.

37.

Variation in selective intensity over space alters classic mutation load predictions.

Agrawal AF.

Heredity (Edinb). 2012 Sep;109(3):135-6. doi: 10.1038/hdy.2012.25. Epub 2012 May 16. No abstract available.

38.

The evolution of sex is favoured during adaptation to new environments.

Becks L, Agrawal AF.

PLoS Biol. 2012;10(5):e1001317. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001317. Epub 2012 May 1.

39.

Temporal variation in selection accelerates mutational decay by Muller's ratchet.

Wardlaw AM, Agrawal AF.

Genetics. 2012 Jul;191(3):907-16. doi: 10.1534/genetics.112.140962. Epub 2012 Apr 27.

40.

Evidence for elevated mutation rates in low-quality genotypes.

Sharp NP, Agrawal AF.

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Apr 17;109(16):6142-6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1118918109. Epub 2012 Mar 26.

41.

The effect of deleterious mutations and age on recombination in Drosophila melanogaster.

Tedman-Aucoin K, Agrawal AF.

Evolution. 2012 Feb;66(2):575-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01450.x. Epub 2011 Sep 20.

PMID:
22276549
42.

The effect of sexual selection on offspring fitness depends on the nature of genetic variation.

Long TA, Agrawal AF, Rowe L.

Curr Biol. 2012 Feb 7;22(3):204-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2011.12.020. Epub 2012 Jan 5.

43.

Are males the more 'sensitive' sex?

Agrawal AF.

Heredity (Edinb). 2011 Jul;107(1):20-1. doi: 10.1038/hdy.2010.156. Epub 2010 Dec 22. No abstract available.

44.

The effect of sex on the mean and variance of fitness in facultatively sexual rotifers.

Becks L, Agrawal AF.

J Evol Biol. 2011 Mar;24(3):656-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2010.02199.x. Epub 2010 Dec 22.

45.

Inferences about the distribution of dominance drawn from yeast gene knockout data.

Agrawal AF, Whitlock MC.

Genetics. 2011 Feb;187(2):553-66. doi: 10.1534/genetics.110.124560. Epub 2010 Nov 23.

46.

Higher rates of sex evolve in spatially heterogeneous environments.

Becks L, Agrawal AF.

Nature. 2010 Nov 4;468(7320):89-92. doi: 10.1038/nature09449. Epub 2010 Oct 13.

PMID:
20944628
47.

Variation in the strength and softness of selection on deleterious mutations.

Laffafian A, King JD, Agrawal AF.

Evolution. 2010 Nov;64(11):3232-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.01062.x.

PMID:
20662923
48.

Ecological determinants of mutation load and inbreeding depression in subdivided populations.

Agrawal AF.

Am Nat. 2010 Aug;176(2):111-22. doi: 10.1086/653672.

PMID:
20545488
49.

Environmental duress and epistasis: how does stress affect the strength of selection on new mutations?

Agrawal AF, Whitlock MC.

Trends Ecol Evol. 2010 Aug;25(8):450-8. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2010.05.003. Epub 2010 Jun 9. Review.

PMID:
20538366
50.

The evolutionary dynamics of operon distributions in eukaryote genomes.

Cutter AD, Agrawal AF.

Genetics. 2010 Jun;185(2):685-93. doi: 10.1534/genetics.110.115766. Epub 2010 Apr 9.

Supplemental Content

Loading ...
Support Center