Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 95

1.

The Refinement of Topics for Systematic Reviews: Lessons and Recommendations From the Effective Health Care Program [Internet].

Buckley DI, Ansari M, Butler M, Williams C, Chang C.

Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2013 Jan.

2.

Understanding Health-Systems' Use of and Need for Evidence To Inform Decisionmaking [Internet].

White CM, Sanders Schmidler GD, Butler M, Wang Z, Robinson K, Mitchell MD, Berkman N, Henderson J, Fiordalisi C, Hartling L, Newberry SJ, Guise JM, Borsky A, Niebuhr D, Pham D, Gozu A, Iyer S, Bañez L.

Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2017 Oct.

3.

Discerning the Perception and Impact of Patients Involved in Evidence-based Practice Center Key Informant Interviews [Internet].

Cornman DH, White CM.

Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2017 Sep.

4.

Evidence Brief: The Effectiveness Of Mandatory Computer-Based Trainings On Government Ethics, Workplace Harassment, Or Privacy And Information Security-Related Topics.

Peterson K, McCleery E.

VA Evidence-based Synthesis Program Evidence Briefs [Internet]. Washington (DC): Department of Veterans Affairs (US); 2011-.
2014 May.

5.

Systematizing the Use of Value of Information Analysis in Prioritizing Systematic Reviews [Internet].

Hoomans T, Seidenfeld J, Basu A, Meltzer D.

Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2012 Aug.

6.

Developing and Selecting Topic Nominations for Systematic Reviews.

Eder M, Feightner A, Webber E, Guirguis-Blake J, Whitlock EP.

Methods Guide for Effectiveness and Comparative Effectiveness Reviews [Internet]. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2008-.
2012 Nov 19.

7.

Horizon Scan: To What Extent Do Changes in Third-Party Payment Affect Clinical Trials and the Evidence Base? [Internet].

Abernethy AP, Allen Lapointe NM, Wheeler JL, Irvine RJ, Patwardhan M, Matchar D.

Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2009 Aug 28.

8.

Defining the Benefits of Stakeholder Engagement in Systematic Reviews [Internet].

Cottrell E, Whitlock E, Kato E, Uhl S, Belinson S, Chang C, Hoomans T, Meltzer D, Noorani H, Robinson K, Schoelles K, Motu'apuaka M, Anderson J, Paynter R, Guise JM.

Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2014 Mar.

9.

Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.

Jardine C, Hrudey S, Shortreed J, Craig L, Krewski D, Furgal C, McColl S.

J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2003 Nov-Dec;6(6):569-720. Review.

PMID:
14698953
11.

Frameworks for Determining Research Gaps During Systematic Reviews [Internet].

Robinson KA, Saldanha IJ, Mckoy NA.

Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2011 Jun.

12.

Peer Review of Search Strategies [Internet].

Relevo R, Paynter R.

Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2012 Jun.

13.

Assessing the Risk of Bias of Individual Studies in Systematic Reviews of Health Care Interventions.

Viswanathan M, Ansari MT, Berkman ND, Chang S, Hartling L, McPheeters M, Santaguida PL, Shamliyan T, Singh K, Tsertsvadze A, Treadwell JR.

Methods Guide for Effectiveness and Comparative Effectiveness Reviews [Internet]. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2008-.
2012 Mar 8.

14.

Methods for Benefit and Harm Assessment in Systematic Reviews [Internet].

Boyd CM, Singh S, Varadhan R, Weiss CO, Sharma R, Bass EB, Puhan MA.

Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2012 Nov.

15.

Evidence Brief: Comparative Effectiveness of Appointment Recall Reminder Procedures for Follow-up Appointments.

Peterson K, McCleery E, Anderson J, Waldrip K, Helfand M.

VA Evidence-based Synthesis Program Evidence Briefs [Internet]. Washington (DC): Department of Veterans Affairs (US); 2011-.
2015 Jul.

16.

The application of knowledge synthesis methods in agri-food public health: recent advancements, challenges and opportunities.

Young I, Waddell L, Sanchez J, Wilhelm B, McEwen SA, Rajić A.

Prev Vet Med. 2014 Mar 1;113(4):339-55. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2013.11.009. Epub 2013 Nov 24. Review.

17.

Assessing the impact of systematic reviews on future research: two case studies.

Viswanathan M, Nerz P, Dalberth B, Voisin C, Lohr KN, Tant E, Jonas DE, Carey T.

J Comp Eff Res. 2012 Jul;1(4):329-46. doi: 10.2217/cer.12.28. Review.

PMID:
24237467
19.

Grading the Strength of a Body of Evidence When Assessing Health Care Interventions for the Effective Health Care Program of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality: An Update.

Berkman ND, Lohr KN, Ansari M, McDonagh M, Balk E, Whitlock E, Reston J, Bass E, Butler M, Gartlehner G, Hartling L, Kane R, McPheeters M, Morgan L, Morton SC, Viswanathan M, Sista P, Chang S.

Methods Guide for Effectiveness and Comparative Effectiveness Reviews [Internet]. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2008-.
2013 Nov 18.

20.

Updating Systematic Reviews.

Shojania KG, Sampson M, Ansari MT, Ji J, Garritty C, Rader T, Moher D.

Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2007 Sep.

Supplemental Content

Support Center