Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 1239

1.

Comparative effectiveness of the C-MAC video laryngoscope versus direct laryngoscopy in the setting of the predicted difficult airway.

Aziz MF, Dillman D, Fu R, Brambrink AM.

Anesthesiology. 2012 Mar;116(3):629-36. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318246ea34.

PMID:
22261795
2.

Management of the predicted difficult airway: a comparison of conventional blade laryngoscopy with video-assisted blade laryngoscopy and the GlideScope.

Serocki G, Bein B, Scholz J, Dörges V.

Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2010 Jan;27(1):24-30. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e32832d328d.

PMID:
19809328
3.

Improvement in glottic visualisation by using the C-MAC PM video laryngoscope as a first-line device for out-of-hospital emergency tracheal intubation: An observational study.

Hossfeld B, Frey K, Doerges V, Lampl L, Helm M.

Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2015 Jun;32(6):425-31. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000249.

PMID:
25886716
4.

First clinical evaluation of the C-MAC D-Blade videolaryngoscope during routine and difficult intubation.

Cavus E, Neumann T, Doerges V, Moeller T, Scharf E, Wagner K, Bein B, Serocki G.

Anesth Analg. 2011 Feb;112(2):382-5. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31820553fb. Epub 2010 Dec 14.

PMID:
21156978
5.

Indirect videolaryngoscopy with C-MAC D-Blade and GlideScope: a randomized, controlled comparison in patients with suspected difficult airways.

Serocki G, Neumann T, Scharf E, Dörges V, Cavus E.

Minerva Anestesiol. 2013 Feb;79(2):121-9. Epub 2012 Oct 2.

PMID:
23032922
6.

A Macintosh laryngoscope blade for videolaryngoscopy reduces stylet use in patients with normal airways.

van Zundert A, Maassen R, Lee R, Willems R, Timmerman M, Siemonsma M, Buise M, Wiepking M.

Anesth Analg. 2009 Sep;109(3):825-31. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181ae39db.

PMID:
19690253
7.

A comparison of the C-MAC video laryngoscope to the Macintosh direct laryngoscope for intubation in the emergency department.

Sakles JC, Mosier J, Chiu S, Cosentino M, Kalin L.

Ann Emerg Med. 2012 Dec;60(6):739-48. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2012.03.031. Epub 2012 May 5.

8.
9.

The C-MAC videolaryngoscope: first experiences with a new device for videolaryngoscopy-guided intubation.

Cavus E, Kieckhaefer J, Doerges V, Moeller T, Thee C, Wagner K.

Anesth Analg. 2010 Feb 1;110(2):473-7. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181c5bce5. Epub 2009 Nov 16.

PMID:
19917623
10.

Endotracheal intubation using the C-MAC® video laryngoscope or the Macintosh laryngoscope: a prospective, comparative study in the ICU.

Noppens RR, Geimer S, Eisel N, David M, Piepho T.

Crit Care. 2012 Jun 13;16(3):R103. doi: 10.1186/cc11384.

11.

Randomized controlled trial comparing the McGrath MAC video laryngoscope with the King Vision video laryngoscope in adult patients.

Alvis BD, Hester D, Watson D, Higgins M, St Jacques P.

Minerva Anestesiol. 2016 Jan;82(1):30-5. Epub 2015 Apr 17.

12.

[Comparison of five video laryngoscopes and conventional direct laryngoscopy : Investigations on simple and simulated difficult airways on the intubation trainer].

Ruetzler K, Imach S, Weiss M, Haas T, Schmidt AR.

Anaesthesist. 2015 Jul;64(7):513-9. doi: 10.1007/s00101-015-0051-5. Epub 2015 Jul 15. German.

PMID:
26174747
13.

Tracheal intubation using the mobile C-MAC video laryngoscope or direct laryngoscopy for patients with a simulated difficult airway.

Byhahn C, Iber T, Zacharowski K, Weber CF, Ruesseler M, Schalk R, Meininger D.

Minerva Anestesiol. 2010 Aug;76(8):577-83.

14.

A comparative trial of the GlideScope(R) video laryngoscope to direct laryngoscope in children with difficult direct laryngoscopy and an evaluation of the effect of blade size.

Lee JH, Park YH, Byon HJ, Han WK, Kim HS, Kim CS, Kim JT.

Anesth Analg. 2013 Jul;117(1):176-81. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e318292f0bf. Epub 2013 May 17.

PMID:
23687227
15.

A comparison of the GlideScope video laryngoscope to the C-MAC video laryngoscope for intubation in the emergency department.

Mosier J, Chiu S, Patanwala AE, Sakles JC.

Ann Emerg Med. 2013 Apr;61(4):414-420.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2012.11.001. Epub 2013 Jan 30.

16.

[Direct laryngoscopy or C-MAC video laryngoscopy? Routine tracheal intubation in patients undergoing ENT surgery].

Meininger D, Strouhal U, Weber CF, Fogl D, Holzer L, Zacharowski K, Byhahn C.

Anaesthesist. 2010 Sep;59(9):806-11. doi: 10.1007/s00101-010-1753-3. Epub 2010 Aug 13. German.

PMID:
20703441
17.

A comparison of bonfils fiberscope-assisted laryngoscopy and standard direct laryngoscopy in simulated difficult pediatric intubation: a manikin study.

Vlatten A, Aucoin S, Litz S, MacManus B, Soder C.

Paediatr Anaesth. 2010 Jun;20(6):559-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2010.03298.x. Epub 2010 Apr 12.

PMID:
20412457
18.

Effectiveness of the C-MAC video laryngoscope in the management of unexpected failed intubations.

Kilicaslan A, Topal A, Tavlan A, Erol A, Otelcioglu S.

Braz J Anesthesiol. 2014 Jan-Feb;64(1):62-5. doi: 10.1016/j.bjane.2013.03.001. Epub 2013 Oct 11.

19.

Video laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for double-lumen endotracheal tube intubation: a retrospective analysis.

Purugganan RV, Jackson TA, Heir JS, Wang H, Cata JP.

J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2012 Oct;26(5):845-8. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2012.01.014. Epub 2012 Feb 22.

PMID:
22361488
20.

Comparison of direct and video-assisted views of the larynx during routine intubation.

Kaplan MB, Hagberg CA, Ward DS, Brambrink A, Chhibber AK, Heidegger T, Lozada L, Ovassapian A, Parsons D, Ramsay J, Wilhelm W, Zwissler B, Gerig HJ, Hofstetter C, Karan S, Kreisler N, Pousman RM, Thierbach A, Wrobel M, Berci G.

J Clin Anesth. 2006 Aug;18(5):357-62.

PMID:
16905081

Supplemental Content

Support Center