Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Methods Mol Biol. 2019;1910:655-690. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-9074-0_22.

Semantic Integration and Enrichment of Heterogeneous Biological Databases.

Author information

1
ZHAW Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Winterthur, Switzerland. simn@zhaw.ch.
2
University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland. simn@zhaw.ch.
3
ZHAW Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Winterthur, Switzerland.
4
University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
5
SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Lausanne, Switzerland.

Abstract

Biological databases are growing at an exponential rate, currently being among the major producers of Big Data, almost on par with commercial generators, such as YouTube or Twitter. While traditionally biological databases evolved as independent silos, each purposely built by a different research group in order to answer specific research questions; more recently significant efforts have been made toward integrating these heterogeneous sources into unified data access systems or interoperable systems using the FAIR principles of data sharing. Semantic Web technologies have been key enablers in this process, opening the path for new insights into the unified data, which were not visible at the level of each independent database. In this chapter, we first provide an introduction into two of the most used database models for biological data: relational databases and RDF stores. Next, we discuss ontology-based data integration, which serves to unify and enrich heterogeneous data sources. We present an extensive timeline of milestones in data integration based on Semantic Web technologies in the field of life sciences. Finally, we discuss some of the remaining challenges in making ontology-based data access (OBDA) systems easily accessible to a larger audience. In particular, we introduce natural language search interfaces, which alleviate the need for database users to be familiar with technical query languages. We illustrate the main theoretical concepts of data integration through concrete examples, using two well-known biological databases: a gene expression database, Bgee, and an orthology database, OMA.

KEYWORDS:

Data integration; Keyword search; Knowledge representation; Ontology-based data access; Query processing; RDF stores; Relational databases

PMID:
31278681
DOI:
10.1007/978-1-4939-9074-0_22
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Springer
Loading ...
Support Center