Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 108

1.

Is there a difference in the grade of degeneration at the cervical spine following anterior cervical fusion with respect to clinical outcome, diagnosis, and repeat procedure? An MRI study of 102 patients with a mean follow-up of 25 years.

Burkhardt BW, Simgen A, Wagenpfeil G, Hendrix P, Dehnen M, Reith W, Oertel JM.

J Neurosurg Spine. 2019 Nov 29:1-9. doi: 10.3171/2019.9.SPINE19887. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
31783354
2.

Is there an impact of cervical plating on the development of adjacent segment degeneration following Smith-Robinson procedure? A magnetic resonance imaging study of 84 patients with a 24-year follow-up.

Burkhardt BW, Simgen A, Dehnen M, Wagenpfeil G, Reith W, Oertel JM.

Spine J. 2019 Apr;19(4):587-596. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.09.001. Epub 2018 Sep 6.

PMID:
30195935
3.
4.

Cervical arthroplasty versus anterior cervical fusion for symptomatic adjacent segment disease after anterior cervical fusion surgery: Review of treatment in 41 patients.

Lee SB, Cho KS.

Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2017 Nov;162:59-66. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2017.08.001. Epub 2017 Aug 4.

PMID:
28938108
5.

Clinical outcome following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with and without anterior cervical plating for the treatment of cervical disc herniation-a 25-year follow-up study.

Burkhardt BW, Brielmaier M, Schwerdtfeger K, Oertel JM.

Neurosurg Rev. 2018 Apr;41(2):473-482. doi: 10.1007/s10143-017-0872-6. Epub 2017 Jun 23.

PMID:
28646343
6.

Smith-Robinson procedure with and without Caspar plating as a treatment for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: A 26-year follow-up of 23 patients.

Burkhardt BW, Brielmaier M, Schwerdtfeger K, Sharif S, Oertel JM.

Eur Spine J. 2017 Apr;26(4):1246-1253. doi: 10.1007/s00586-017-4988-8. Epub 2017 Feb 9.

PMID:
28185064
7.

Is cervical disc arthroplasty good for congenital cervical stenosis?

Chang PY, Chang HK, Wu JC, Huang WC, Fay LY, Tu TH, Wu CL, Cheng H.

J Neurosurg Spine. 2017 May;26(5):577-585. doi: 10.3171/2016.10.SPINE16317. Epub 2017 Mar 10.

PMID:
28291414
8.

Effect of cervical dynamics on adjacent segment degeneration after anterior cervical fusion with cages.

Elsawaf A, Mastronardi L, Roperto R, Bozzao A, Caroli M, Ferrante L.

Neurosurg Rev. 2009 Apr;32(2):215-24; discussion 224. doi: 10.1007/s10143-008-0164-2. Epub 2008 Oct 10.

PMID:
18846395
9.

Cervical kinematics and radiological changes after Discover artificial disc replacement versus fusion.

Hou Y, Liu Y, Yuan W, Wang X, Chen H, Yang L, Zhang Y.

Spine J. 2014 Jun 1;14(6):867-77. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.07.432. Epub 2013 Sep 26.

PMID:
24076441
10.

Stabilization with the Dynamic Cervical Implant: a novel treatment approach following cervical discectomy and decompression.

Matgé G, Berthold C, Gunness VR, Hana A, Hertel F.

J Neurosurg Spine. 2015 Mar;22(3):237-45. doi: 10.3171/2014.10.SPINE131089. Epub 2015 Jan 2.

PMID:
25555050
11.

Two-level corpectomy versus three-level discectomy for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a comparison of perioperative, radiographic, and clinical outcomes.

Lau D, Chou D, Mummaneni PV.

J Neurosurg Spine. 2015 Sep;23(3):280-9. doi: 10.3171/2014.12.SPINE14545. Epub 2015 Jun 19.

PMID:
26091438
12.

Hybrid Method of Transvertebral Foraminotomy Combined with Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion for Multilevel Cervical Disease.

Yamamoto Y, Hara M, Nishimura Y, Haimoto S, Wakabayashi T.

Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2018 Mar 15;58(3):124-131. doi: 10.2176/nmc.oa.2017-0196. Epub 2018 Feb 7.

13.

[Effect of cervical disc arthroplasty and anterior cervical decompression and fusion on adjacent segment degeneration].

Guan T, Hu Z, Xiu L, Li N, Jin Q.

Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2014 Sep;28(9):1100-5. Chinese.

PMID:
25509774
14.
15.

There is no increased risk of adjacent segment disease at the cervicothoracic junction following an anterior cervical discectomy and fusion to C7.

Louie PK, Presciutti SM, Iantorno SE, Bohl DD, Shah K, Shifflett GD, An HS.

Spine J. 2017 Sep;17(9):1264-1271. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.04.027. Epub 2017 Apr 26.

PMID:
28456670
16.

Factors predicting adjacent segment disease after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion treating cervical spondylotic myelopathy: A retrospective study with 5-year follow-up.

You J, Tang X, Gao W, Shen Y, Ding WY, Ren B.

Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Oct;97(43):e12893. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000012893.

17.

Comparison of radiographic changes after ACDF versus Bryan disc arthroplasty in single and bi-level cases.

Kim SW, Limson MA, Kim SB, Arbatin JJ, Chang KY, Park MS, Shin JH, Ju YS.

Eur Spine J. 2009 Feb;18(2):218-31. doi: 10.1007/s00586-008-0854-z. Epub 2009 Jan 6.

18.

The Fate of Adjacent Segments After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: The Influence of an Anterior Plate System.

Ahn SS, Paik HK, Chin DK, Kim SH, Kim DW, Ku MG.

World Neurosurg. 2016 May;89:42-50. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.01.013. Epub 2016 Jan 30.

PMID:
26828457
19.

Adjacent segment degeneration after single-level anterior cervical decompression and fusion: disc space distraction and its impact on clinical outcomes.

Li J, Li Y, Kong F, Zhang D, Zhang Y, Shen Y.

J Clin Neurosci. 2015 Mar;22(3):566-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2014.08.019. Epub 2014 Dec 5.

PMID:
25487176
20.

[Effectiveness evaluation of Prodisc-C prosthesis for more than 10 years follow-up after total cervical disc replacement].

Xu S, Liang Y, Zhu Z, Wang K, Liu H.

Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2019 Apr 15;33(4):393-402. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.201810109. Chinese.

PMID:
30983184

Supplemental Content

Support Center