Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 102

1.

Polarity- and Intensity-Independent Modulation of Timing During Delay Eyeblink Conditioning Using Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation.

Mitroi J, Burroughs LP, Moussa-Tooks AB, Bolbecker AR, Lundin NB, O'Donnell BF, Hetrick WP.

Cerebellum. 2020 Feb 8. doi: 10.1007/s12311-020-01114-w. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
32036562
2.

Acquisition of conditioned eyeblink responses is modulated by cerebellar tDCS.

Zuchowski ML, Timmann D, Gerwig M.

Brain Stimul. 2014 Jul-Aug;7(4):525-31. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2014.03.010. Epub 2014 Apr 3.

PMID:
24776785
3.

Cerebellar tDCS Effects on Conditioned Eyeblinks using Different Electrode Placements and Stimulation Protocols.

Beyer L, Batsikadze G, Timmann D, Gerwig M.

Front Hum Neurosci. 2017 Feb 1;11:23. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00023. eCollection 2017.

4.

Cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation interacts with BDNF Val66Met in motor learning.

van der Vliet R, Jonker ZD, Louwen SC, Heuvelman M, de Vreede L, Ribbers GM, De Zeeuw CI, Donchin O, Selles RW, van der Geest JN, Frens MA.

Brain Stimul. 2018 Jul - Aug;11(4):759-771. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2018.04.009. Epub 2018 Apr 11.

5.

Prefrontal but not cerebellar tDCS attenuates renewal of extinguished conditioned eyeblink responses.

Lipp J, Draganova R, Batsikadze G, Ernst TM, Uengoer M, Timmann D.

Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2019 Dec 12:107137. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2019.107137. [Epub ahead of print] Review.

PMID:
31838223
6.

Systematic evaluation of the impact of stimulation intensity on neuroplastic after-effects induced by transcranial direct current stimulation.

Jamil A, Batsikadze G, Kuo HI, Labruna L, Hasan A, Paulus W, Nitsche MA.

J Physiol. 2017 Feb 15;595(4):1273-1288. doi: 10.1113/JP272738. Epub 2016 Nov 8.

7.

Modulation of cerebellar excitability by polarity-specific noninvasive direct current stimulation.

Galea JM, Jayaram G, Ajagbe L, Celnik P.

J Neurosci. 2009 Jul 15;29(28):9115-22. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2184-09.2009.

8.

Effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on semantic discrimination eyeblink conditioning.

Kotilainen T, Lehto SM, Wikgren J.

Behav Brain Res. 2015 Oct 1;292:142-6. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2015.06.021. Epub 2015 Jun 19.

PMID:
26099815
9.

Modulation of linguistic prediction by TDCS of the right lateral cerebellum.

Miall RC, Antony J, Goldsmith-Sumner A, Harding SR, McGovern C, Winter JL.

Neuropsychologia. 2016 Jun;86:103-9. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.04.022. Epub 2016 Apr 25.

10.

Modulating human procedural learning by cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation.

Ferrucci R, Brunoni AR, Parazzini M, Vergari M, Rossi E, Fumagalli M, Mameli F, Rosa M, Giannicola G, Zago S, Priori A.

Cerebellum. 2013 Aug;12(4):485-92. doi: 10.1007/s12311-012-0436-9.

PMID:
23328908
11.

Online and offline effects of cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation on motor learning in healthy older adults: a randomized double-blind sham-controlled study.

Samaei A, Ehsani F, Zoghi M, Hafez Yosephi M, Jaberzadeh S.

Eur J Neurosci. 2017 May;45(9):1177-1185. doi: 10.1111/ejn.13559. Epub 2017 Apr 3.

PMID:
28278354
12.

New Insights into the Nature of Cerebellar-Dependent Eyeblink Conditioning Deficits in Schizophrenia: A Hierarchical Linear Modeling Approach.

Bolbecker AR, Petersen IT, Kent JS, Howell JM, O'Donnell BF, Hetrick WP.

Front Psychiatry. 2016 Jan 25;7:4. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2016.00004. eCollection 2016.

13.

The impact of cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on learning fine-motor sequences.

Shimizu RE, Wu AD, Samra JK, Knowlton BJ.

Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2017 Jan 5;372(1711). pii: 20160050.

14.

Effects of cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation on the cognitive stage of sequence learning.

Ballard HK, Goen JRM, Maldonado T, Bernard JA.

J Neurophysiol. 2019 Aug 1;122(2):490-499. doi: 10.1152/jn.00036.2019. Epub 2019 Jun 5.

PMID:
31166807
15.

Polarity independent effects of cerebellar tDCS on short term ankle visuomotor learning.

Shah B, Nguyen TT, Madhavan S.

Brain Stimul. 2013 Nov;6(6):966-8. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2013.04.008. Epub 2013 May 17.

PMID:
23711765
16.

Impaired cerebellar-dependent eyeblink conditioning in first-degree relatives of individuals with schizophrenia.

Bolbecker AR, Kent JS, Petersen IT, Klaunig MJ, Forsyth JK, Howell JM, Westfall DR, O'Donnell BF, Hetrick WP.

Schizophr Bull. 2014 Sep;40(5):1001-10. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbt112. Epub 2013 Aug 20.

17.

Partially non-linear stimulation intensity-dependent effects of direct current stimulation on motor cortex excitability in humans.

Batsikadze G, Moliadze V, Paulus W, Kuo MF, Nitsche MA.

J Physiol. 2013 Apr 1;591(7):1987-2000. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2012.249730. Epub 2013 Jan 21.

18.

Non-linear effects of cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) of the primary motor cortex on implicit motor learning.

Shilo G, Lavidor M.

Exp Brain Res. 2019 Apr;237(4):919-925. doi: 10.1007/s00221-019-05477-3. Epub 2019 Jan 19.

PMID:
30661087
19.

Anodal cerebellar tDCS modulates lower extremity pain perception.

Pereira M, Rafiq B, Chowdhury E, Babayev J, Boo H, Metwaly R, Sandilya P, Chusid E, Battaglia F.

NeuroRehabilitation. 2017;40(2):195-200. doi: 10.3233/NRE-161404.

PMID:
28222543
20.

Cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation in spinocerebellar ataxia type 3 (SCA3-tDCS): rationale and protocol of a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled study.

Maas RPPWM, Toni I, Doorduin J, Klockgether T, Schutter DJLG, van de Warrenburg BPC.

BMC Neurol. 2019 Jul 4;19(1):149. doi: 10.1186/s12883-019-1379-2.

Supplemental Content

Support Center