Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 105

1.

A novel tDCS sham approach based on model-driven controlled shunting.

Neri F, Mencarelli L, Menardi A, Giovannelli F, Rossi S, Sprugnoli G, Rossi A, Pascual-Leone A, Salvador R, Ruffini G, Santarnecchi E.

Brain Stimul. 2019 Nov 9. pii: S1935-861X(19)30436-X. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2019.11.004. [Epub ahead of print]

2.

Partially non-linear stimulation intensity-dependent effects of direct current stimulation on motor cortex excitability in humans.

Batsikadze G, Moliadze V, Paulus W, Kuo MF, Nitsche MA.

J Physiol. 2013 Apr 1;591(7):1987-2000. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2012.249730. Epub 2013 Jan 21.

3.

Efficacy of Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation is Related to Sensitivity to Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.

Labruna L, Jamil A, Fresnoza S, Batsikadze G, Kuo MF, Vanderschelden B, Ivry RB, Nitsche MA.

Brain Stimul. 2016 Jan-Feb;9(1):8-15. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2015.08.014. Epub 2015 Sep 1.

4.

Intensity dependent effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on corticospinal excitability in chronic spinal cord injury.

Murray LM, Edwards DJ, Ruffini G, Labar D, Stampas A, Pascual-Leone A, Cortes M.

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015 Apr;96(4 Suppl):S114-21. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.11.004. Epub 2014 Nov 22.

5.

Systematic evaluation of the impact of stimulation intensity on neuroplastic after-effects induced by transcranial direct current stimulation.

Jamil A, Batsikadze G, Kuo HI, Labruna L, Hasan A, Paulus W, Nitsche MA.

J Physiol. 2017 Feb 15;595(4):1273-1288. doi: 10.1113/JP272738. Epub 2016 Nov 8.

6.

Non-invasive brain stimulation techniques for chronic pain.

O'Connell NE, Marston L, Spencer S, DeSouza LH, Wand BM.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Mar 16;3:CD008208. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008208.pub4. Review. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 13;4:CD008208.

PMID:
29547226
7.

Non-invasive brain stimulation techniques for chronic pain.

O'Connell NE, Marston L, Spencer S, DeSouza LH, Wand BM.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 13;4:CD008208. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008208.pub5. Review.

8.

Evaluation of sham transcranial direct current stimulation for randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials.

Palm U, Reisinger E, Keeser D, Kuo MF, Pogarell O, Leicht G, Mulert C, Nitsche MA, Padberg F.

Brain Stimul. 2013 Jul;6(4):690-5. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2013.01.005. Epub 2013 Feb 8.

PMID:
23415938
9.

Intra-Subject Consistency and Reliability of Response Following 2 mA Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation.

Dyke K, Kim S, Jackson GM, Jackson SR.

Brain Stimul. 2016 Nov - Dec;9(6):819-825. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2016.06.052. Epub 2016 Jun 21.

PMID:
27387569
10.

Blinding is compromised for transcranial direct current stimulation at 1 mA for 20 min in young healthy adults.

Turi Z, Csifcsák G, Boayue NM, Aslaksen P, Antal A, Paulus W, Groot J, Hawkins GE, Forstmann B, Opitz A, Thielscher A, Mittner M.

Eur J Neurosci. 2019 Oct;50(8):3261-3268. doi: 10.1111/ejn.14403. Epub 2019 Apr 8.

PMID:
30888090
11.

Corticomotor excitability induced by anodal transcranial direct current stimulation with and without non-exhaustive movement.

Miyaguchi S, Onishi H, Kojima S, Sugawara K, Tsubaki A, Kirimoto H, Tamaki H, Yamamoto N.

Brain Res. 2013 Sep 5;1529:83-91. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2013.07.026. Epub 2013 Jul 24.

PMID:
23891715
12.

Validating a Sham Condition for Use in High Definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation.

Garnett EO, den Ouden DB.

Brain Stimul. 2015 May-Jun;8(3):551-4. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2015.01.399. Epub 2015 Jan 14.

PMID:
25686528
13.

The association of motor imagery and kinesthetic illusion prolongs the effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on corticospinal tract excitability.

Kaneko F, Shibata E, Hayami T, Nagahata K, Aoyama T.

J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2016 Apr 15;13:36. doi: 10.1186/s12984-016-0143-8.

14.

Transcranial DC stimulation (tDCS): a tool for double-blind sham-controlled clinical studies in brain stimulation.

Gandiga PC, Hummel FC, Cohen LG.

Clin Neurophysiol. 2006 Apr;117(4):845-50. Epub 2006 Jan 19.

PMID:
16427357
15.

Tolerability and blinding of 4x1 high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS) at two and three milliamps.

Reckow J, Rahman-Filipiak A, Garcia S, Schlaefflin S, Calhoun O, DaSilva AF, Bikson M, Hampstead BM.

Brain Stimul. 2018 Sep - Oct;11(5):991-997. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2018.04.022. Epub 2018 May 4.

16.

Excitability modulation of the motor system induced by transcranial direct current stimulation: a multimodal approach.

Pellicciari MC, Brignani D, Miniussi C.

Neuroimage. 2013 Dec;83:569-80. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.06.076. Epub 2013 Jul 9.

PMID:
23845429
17.

Effects of a common transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) protocol on motor evoked potentials found to be highly variable within individuals over 9 testing sessions.

Horvath JC, Vogrin SJ, Carter O, Cook MJ, Forte JD.

Exp Brain Res. 2016 Sep;234(9):2629-42. doi: 10.1007/s00221-016-4667-8. Epub 2016 May 5.

PMID:
27150317
18.

The time course of ineffective sham-blinding during low-intensity (1 mA) transcranial direct current stimulation.

Greinacher R, Buhôt L, Möller L, Learmonth G.

Eur J Neurosci. 2019 Oct;50(8):3380-3388. doi: 10.1111/ejn.14497. Epub 2019 Jul 8.

19.

Variability in response to transcranial direct current stimulation of the motor cortex.

Wiethoff S, Hamada M, Rothwell JC.

Brain Stimul. 2014 May-Jun;7(3):468-75. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2014.02.003. Epub 2014 Feb 15.

PMID:
24630848

Supplemental Content

Support Center