Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 102

1.

The Tolerability and Efficacy of 4 mA Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Leg Muscle Fatigability.

Workman CD, Kamholz J, Rudroff T.

Brain Sci. 2019 Dec 23;10(1). pii: E12. doi: 10.3390/brainsci10010012.

2.

Increased leg muscle fatigability during 2 mA and 4 mA transcranial direct current stimulation over the left motor cortex.

Workman CD, Kamholz J, Rudroff T.

Exp Brain Res. 2020 Jan 9. doi: 10.1007/s00221-019-05721-w. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
31919540
3.

Systematic evaluation of the impact of stimulation intensity on neuroplastic after-effects induced by transcranial direct current stimulation.

Jamil A, Batsikadze G, Kuo HI, Labruna L, Hasan A, Paulus W, Nitsche MA.

J Physiol. 2017 Feb 15;595(4):1273-1288. doi: 10.1113/JP272738. Epub 2016 Nov 8.

4.

Tolerability of Repeated Application of Transcranial Electrical Stimulation with Limited Outputs to Healthy Subjects.

Paneri B, Adair D, Thomas C, Khadka N, Patel V, Tyler WJ, Parra L, Bikson M.

Brain Stimul. 2016 Sep-Oct;9(5):740-754. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2016.05.008. Epub 2016 May 24.

5.

No effect of tDCS of the primary motor cortex on isometric exercise performance or perceived fatigue.

Wrightson JG, Twomey R, Yeung STY, Millet GY.

Eur J Neurosci. 2019 Dec 17. doi: 10.1111/ejn.14651. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
31846516
6.

Partially non-linear stimulation intensity-dependent effects of direct current stimulation on motor cortex excitability in humans.

Batsikadze G, Moliadze V, Paulus W, Kuo MF, Nitsche MA.

J Physiol. 2013 Apr 1;591(7):1987-2000. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2012.249730. Epub 2013 Jan 21.

7.

Intra-Subject Consistency and Reliability of Response Following 2 mA Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation.

Dyke K, Kim S, Jackson GM, Jackson SR.

Brain Stimul. 2016 Nov - Dec;9(6):819-825. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2016.06.052. Epub 2016 Jun 21.

PMID:
27387569
8.

Titrating the neuroplastic effects of cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the primary motor cortex.

Mosayebi Samani M, Agboada D, Jamil A, Kuo MF, Nitsche MA.

Cortex. 2019 Oct;119:350-361. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2019.04.016. Epub 2019 May 7.

PMID:
31195316
9.

Tolerability and blinding of 4x1 high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS) at two and three milliamps.

Reckow J, Rahman-Filipiak A, Garcia S, Schlaefflin S, Calhoun O, DaSilva AF, Bikson M, Hampstead BM.

Brain Stimul. 2018 Sep - Oct;11(5):991-997. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2018.04.022. Epub 2018 May 4.

10.

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Does Not Affect Lower Extremity Muscle Strength Training in Healthy Individuals: A Triple-Blind, Sham-Controlled Study.

Maeda K, Yamaguchi T, Tatemoto T, Kondo K, Otaka Y, Tanaka S.

Front Neurosci. 2017 Apr 4;11:179. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2017.00179. eCollection 2017.

11.
12.

The Effect of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) Electrode Size and Current Intensity on Motor Cortical Excitability: Evidence From Single and Repeated Sessions.

Ho KA, Taylor JL, Chew T, Gálvez V, Alonzo A, Bai S, Dokos S, Loo CK.

Brain Stimul. 2016 Jan-Feb;9(1):1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2015.08.003. Epub 2015 Aug 14.

PMID:
26350410
13.

Intensity dependent effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on corticospinal excitability in chronic spinal cord injury.

Murray LM, Edwards DJ, Ruffini G, Labar D, Stampas A, Pascual-Leone A, Cortes M.

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015 Apr;96(4 Suppl):S114-21. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.11.004. Epub 2014 Nov 22.

14.

Transcranial direct current stimulation improves isometric time to exhaustion of the knee extensors.

Angius L, Pageaux B, Hopker J, Marcora SM, Mauger AR.

Neuroscience. 2016 Dec 17;339:363-375. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2016.10.028. Epub 2016 Oct 14.

15.

Current intensity- and polarity-specific online and aftereffects of transcranial direct current stimulation: An fMRI study.

Jamil A, Batsikadze G, Kuo HI, Meesen RLJ, Dechent P, Paulus W, Nitsche MA.

Hum Brain Mapp. 2019 Dec 20. doi: 10.1002/hbm.24901. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
31860160
16.

Slow-oscillatory transcranial direct current stimulation can induce bidirectional shifts in motor cortical excitability in awake humans.

Groppa S, Bergmann TO, Siems C, Mölle M, Marshall L, Siebner HR.

Neuroscience. 2010 Apr 14;166(4):1219-25. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2010.01.019. Epub 2010 Jan 18.

PMID:
20083166
17.

Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation enhances time to task failure of a submaximal contraction of elbow flexors without changing corticospinal excitability.

Abdelmoula A, Baudry S, Duchateau J.

Neuroscience. 2016 May 13;322:94-103. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2016.02.025. Epub 2016 Feb 15.

PMID:
26892298
19.

Response variability of different anodal transcranial direct current stimulation intensities across multiple sessions.

Ammann C, Lindquist MA, Celnik PA.

Brain Stimul. 2017 Jul - Aug;10(4):757-763. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2017.04.003. Epub 2017 Apr 10.

20.

Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on temperature and pain perception.

Mordillo-Mateos L, Dileone M, Soto-León V, Brocalero-Camacho A, Pérez-Borrego YA, Onate-Figuerez A, Aguilar J, Oliviero A.

Sci Rep. 2017 Jun 7;7(1):2946. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-03173-2.

Supplemental Content

Support Center