Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 105

1.

Prospects for transcranial temporal interference stimulation in humans: A computational study.

Rampersad S, Roig-Solvas B, Yarossi M, Kulkarni PP, Santarnecchi E, Dorval AD, Brooks DH.

Neuroimage. 2019 Aug 29:116124. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116124. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
31473351
2.

How to target inter-regional phase synchronization with dual-site Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation.

Saturnino GB, Madsen KH, Siebner HR, Thielscher A.

Neuroimage. 2017 Dec;163:68-80. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.09.024. Epub 2017 Sep 15.

PMID:
28919407
3.

Simultaneously Excitatory and Inhibitory Effects of Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation Revealed Using Selective Pulse-Train Stimulation in the Rat Motor Cortex.

Khatoun A, Asamoah B, Mc Laughlin M.

J Neurosci. 2017 Sep 27;37(39):9389-9402. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1390-17.2017. Epub 2017 Aug 28.

4.

Optimization of multifocal transcranial current stimulation for weighted cortical pattern targeting from realistic modeling of electric fields.

Ruffini G, Fox MD, Ripolles O, Miranda PC, Pascual-Leone A.

Neuroimage. 2014 Apr 1;89:216-25. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.12.002. Epub 2013 Dec 15.

5.

Targeting alpha-band oscillations in a cortical model with amplitude-modulated high-frequency transcranial electric stimulation.

Negahbani E, Kasten FH, Herrmann CS, Fröhlich F.

Neuroimage. 2018 Jun;173:3-12. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.02.005. Epub 2018 Feb 7.

6.

Simulating transcranial direct current stimulation with a detailed anisotropic human head model.

Rampersad SM, Janssen AM, Lucka F, Aydin Ü, Lanfer B, Lew S, Wolters CH, Stegeman DF, Oostendorp TF.

IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2014 May;22(3):441-52. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2014.2308997. Epub 2014 Feb 28.

PMID:
24760939
7.

The impact of large structural brain changes in chronic stroke patients on the electric field caused by transcranial brain stimulation.

Minjoli S, Saturnino GB, Blicher JU, Stagg CJ, Siebner HR, Antunes A, Thielscher A.

Neuroimage Clin. 2017 Apr 18;15:106-117. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2017.04.014. eCollection 2017.

8.

Comparison of electric field strength and spatial distribution of electroconvulsive therapy and magnetic seizure therapy in a realistic human head model.

Lee WH, Lisanby SH, Laine AF, Peterchev AV.

Eur Psychiatry. 2016 Aug;36:55-64. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2016.03.003. Epub 2016 Jun 16.

9.

Noninvasive Deep Brain Stimulation via Temporally Interfering Electric Fields.

Grossman N, Bono D, Dedic N, Kodandaramaiah SB, Rudenko A, Suk HJ, Cassara AM, Neufeld E, Kuster N, Tsai LH, Pascual-Leone A, Boyden ES.

Cell. 2017 Jun 1;169(6):1029-1041.e16. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.05.024.

10.

Electric field-induced effects on neuronal cell biology accompanying dielectrophoretic trapping.

Heida T.

Adv Anat Embryol Cell Biol. 2003;173:III-IX, 1-77. Review.

PMID:
12901336
11.

Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation Attenuates Neuronal Adaptation.

Kar K, Duijnhouwer J, Krekelberg B.

J Neurosci. 2017 Mar 1;37(9):2325-2335. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2266-16.2016. Epub 2017 Jan 30.

12.

On the importance of electrode parameters for shaping electric field patterns generated by tDCS.

Saturnino GB, Antunes A, Thielscher A.

Neuroimage. 2015 Oct 15;120:25-35. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.06.067. Epub 2015 Jul 2.

PMID:
26142274
13.

Optimized auditory transcranial alternating current stimulation improves individual auditory temporal resolution.

Baltus A, Wagner S, Wolters CH, Herrmann CS.

Brain Stimul. 2018 Jan - Feb;11(1):118-124. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2017.10.008. Epub 2017 Oct 17.

PMID:
29079460
14.

Finite-Element Model Predicts Current Density Distribution for Clinical Applications of tDCS and tACS.

Neuling T, Wagner S, Wolters CH, Zaehle T, Herrmann CS.

Front Psychiatry. 2012 Sep 24;3:83. eCollection 2012.

15.

Endogenous cortical oscillations constrain neuromodulation by weak electric fields.

Schmidt SL, Iyengar AK, Foulser AA, Boyle MR, Fröhlich F.

Brain Stimul. 2014 Nov-Dec;7(6):878-89. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2014.07.033. Epub 2014 Jul 19.

16.

Physiological observations validate finite element models for estimating subject-specific electric field distributions induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human motor cortex.

Opitz A, Legon W, Rowlands A, Bickel WK, Paulus W, Tyler WJ.

Neuroimage. 2013 Nov 1;81:253-264. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.04.067. Epub 2013 May 1.

17.

Transcranial alternating current stimulation enhances individual alpha activity in human EEG.

Zaehle T, Rach S, Herrmann CS.

PLoS One. 2010 Nov 1;5(11):e13766. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013766.

18.

Can transcranial electric stimulation with multiple electrodes reach deep targets?

Huang Y, Parra LC.

Brain Stimul. 2019 Jan - Feb;12(1):30-40. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2018.09.010. Epub 2018 Sep 26. Review.

PMID:
30297323
19.

Optimized multi-electrode stimulation increases focality and intensity at target.

Dmochowski JP, Datta A, Bikson M, Su Y, Parra LC.

J Neural Eng. 2011 Aug;8(4):046011. doi: 10.1088/1741-2560/8/4/046011. Epub 2011 Jun 10.

PMID:
21659696
20.

Transcranial current stimulation focality using disc and ring electrode configurations: FEM analysis.

Datta A, Elwassif M, Battaglia F, Bikson M.

J Neural Eng. 2008 Jun;5(2):163-74. doi: 10.1088/1741-2560/5/2/007. Epub 2008 Apr 28.

PMID:
18441418

Supplemental Content

Support Center