Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 101

1.

Influence of neurovascular mechanisms on response to tDCS: an exploratory study.

Iyer PC, Rosenberg A, Baynard T, Madhavan S.

Exp Brain Res. 2019 Aug 27. doi: 10.1007/s00221-019-05626-8. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
31455998
2.

Single Sessions of High-Definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Do Not Alter Lower Extremity Biomechanical or Corticomotor Response Variables Post-stroke.

Kindred JH, Kautz SA, Wonsetler EC, Bowden MG.

Front Neurosci. 2019 Apr 11;13:286. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2019.00286. eCollection 2019.

3.

Systematic evaluation of the impact of stimulation intensity on neuroplastic after-effects induced by transcranial direct current stimulation.

Jamil A, Batsikadze G, Kuo HI, Labruna L, Hasan A, Paulus W, Nitsche MA.

J Physiol. 2017 Feb 15;595(4):1273-1288. doi: 10.1113/JP272738. Epub 2016 Nov 8.

4.

Non-invasive brain stimulation in the modulation of cerebral blood flow after stroke: A systematic review of Transcranial Doppler studies.

Iyer PC, Madhavan S.

Clin Neurophysiol. 2018 Dec;129(12):2544-2551. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2018.09.019. Epub 2018 Oct 25.

PMID:
30384025
5.

Adaptive threshold hunting for the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on primary motor cortex inhibition.

Mooney RA, Cirillo J, Byblow WD.

Exp Brain Res. 2018 Jun;236(6):1651-1663. doi: 10.1007/s00221-018-5250-2. Epub 2018 Apr 2.

PMID:
29610948
6.

Raised corticomotor excitability of M1 forearm area following anodal tDCS is sustained during robotic wrist therapy in chronic stroke.

Edwards DJ, Krebs HI, Rykman A, Zipse J, Thickbroom GW, Mastaglia FL, Pascual-Leone A, Volpe BT.

Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2009;27(3):199-207. doi: 10.3233/RNN-2009-0470.

7.

Comparison of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Electrode Montages for the Lower Limb Motor Cortex.

Patel R, Madhavan S.

Brain Sci. 2019 Aug 6;9(8). pii: E189. doi: 10.3390/brainsci9080189.

8.

EEG-NIRS based assessment of neurovascular coupling during anodal transcranial direct current stimulation--a stroke case series.

Dutta A, Jacob A, Chowdhury SR, Das A, Nitsche MA.

J Med Syst. 2015 Apr;39(4):205. doi: 10.1007/s10916-015-0205-7. Epub 2015 Feb 17.

PMID:
25686912
9.

Development of Point of Care Testing Device for Neurovascular Coupling From Simultaneous Recording of EEG and NIRS During Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation.

Jindal U, Sood M, Dutta A, Chowdhury SR.

IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med. 2015 Jan 16;3:2000112. doi: 10.1109/JTEHM.2015.2389230. eCollection 2015.

10.

Reliability and Variability of tDCS Induced Changes in the Lower Limb Motor Cortex.

Madhavan S, Sriraman A, Freels S.

Brain Sci. 2016 Jul 27;6(3). pii: E26. doi: 10.3390/brainsci6030026.

11.

Effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation over lower limb primary motor cortex on motor learning in healthy individuals.

Foerster Á, Dutta A, Kuo MF, Paulus W, Nitsche MA.

Eur J Neurosci. 2018 Apr;47(7):779-789. doi: 10.1111/ejn.13866. Epub 2018 Mar 6.

PMID:
29443433
12.
13.

Changes in spectroscopic biomarkers after transcranial direct current stimulation in children with perinatal stroke.

Carlson HL, Ciechanski P, Harris AD, MacMaster FP, Kirton A.

Brain Stimul. 2018 Jan - Feb;11(1):94-103. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2017.09.007. Epub 2017 Sep 13.

PMID:
28958737
14.
15.

Systematic assessment of duration and intensity of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on primary motor cortex excitability.

Tremblay S, Larochelle-Brunet F, Lafleur LP, El Mouderrib S, Lepage JF, Théoret H.

Eur J Neurosci. 2016 Sep;44(5):2184-90. doi: 10.1111/ejn.13321. Epub 2016 Jul 12.

PMID:
27336413
16.

Intra-Subject Consistency and Reliability of Response Following 2 mA Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation.

Dyke K, Kim S, Jackson GM, Jackson SR.

Brain Stimul. 2016 Nov - Dec;9(6):819-825. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2016.06.052. Epub 2016 Jun 21.

PMID:
27387569
17.

Safety and effects on motor cortex excitability of five anodal transcranial direct current stimulation sessions in 24hours.

Zappasodi F, Musumeci G, Navarra R, Di Lazzaro V, Caulo M, Uncini A.

Neurophysiol Clin. 2019 Feb;49(1):19-25. doi: 10.1016/j.neucli.2018.12.003. Epub 2019 Jan 8.

PMID:
30635162
18.

The association of motor imagery and kinesthetic illusion prolongs the effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on corticospinal tract excitability.

Kaneko F, Shibata E, Hayami T, Nagahata K, Aoyama T.

J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2016 Apr 15;13:36. doi: 10.1186/s12984-016-0143-8.

19.

Revisiting interhemispheric imbalance in chronic stroke: A tDCS study.

McCambridge AB, Stinear JW, Byblow WD.

Clin Neurophysiol. 2018 Jan;129(1):42-50. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2017.10.016. Epub 2017 Oct 28.

PMID:
29145166
20.

Different current intensities of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation do not differentially modulate motor cortex plasticity.

Kidgell DJ, Daly RM, Young K, Lum J, Tooley G, Jaberzadeh S, Zoghi M, Pearce AJ.

Neural Plast. 2013;2013:603502. doi: 10.1155/2013/603502. Epub 2013 Mar 18.

Supplemental Content

Support Center