Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 100

1.

Tubulin response to intense nanosecond-scale electric field in molecular dynamics simulation.

Marracino P, Havelka D, Průša J, Liberti M, Tuszynski J, Ayoub AT, Apollonio F, Cifra M.

Sci Rep. 2019 Jul 19;9(1):10477. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-46636-4.

2.

Molecular dynamics simulation of the nanosecond pulsed electric field effect on kinesin nanomotor.

Průša J, Cifra M.

Sci Rep. 2019 Dec 23;9(1):19721. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-56052-3.

3.

Tubulin's response to external electric fields by molecular dynamics simulations.

Timmons JJ, Preto J, Tuszynski JA, Wong ET.

PLoS One. 2018 Sep 19;13(9):e0202141. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202141. eCollection 2018.

4.

Nanosecond pulsed electric signals can affect electrostatic environment of proteins below the threshold of conformational effects: The case study of SOD1 with a molecular simulation study.

Della Valle E, Marracino P, Pakhomova O, Liberti M, Apollonio F.

PLoS One. 2019 Aug 27;14(8):e0221685. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221685. eCollection 2019.

5.

Macromolecular crowding: chemistry and physics meet biology (Ascona, Switzerland, 10-14 June 2012).

Foffi G, Pastore A, Piazza F, Temussi PA.

Phys Biol. 2013 Aug;10(4):040301. Epub 2013 Aug 2.

PMID:
23912807
6.

Reversible and Irreversible Modulation of Tubulin Self-Assembly by Intense Nanosecond Pulsed Electric Fields.

Chafai DE, Sulimenko V, Havelka D, Kubínová L, Dráber P, Cifra M.

Adv Mater. 2019 Sep;31(39):e1903636. doi: 10.1002/adma.201903636. Epub 2019 Aug 13.

PMID:
31408579
7.

Towards solid tumor treatment by nanosecond pulsed electric fields.

Esser AT, Smith KC, Gowrishankar TR, Weaver JC.

Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2009 Aug;8(4):289-306.

PMID:
19645522
8.

Electrosensitization Increases Antitumor Effectiveness of Nanosecond Pulsed Electric Fields In Vivo.

Muratori C, Pakhomov AG, Heller L, Casciola M, Gianulis E, Grigoryev S, Xiao S, Pakhomova ON.

Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2017 Jan 1:1533034617712397. doi: 10.1177/1533034617712397. [Epub ahead of print]

9.

Molecular dynamics modeling of tubulin C-terminal tail interactions with the microtubule surface.

Freedman H, Luchko T, Luduena RF, Tuszynski JA.

Proteins. 2011 Oct;79(10):2968-82. doi: 10.1002/prot.23155. Epub 2011 Aug 26.

PMID:
21905119
10.

Combination of microsecond and nanosecond pulsed electric field treatments for inactivation of Escherichia coli in water samples.

Žgalin MK, Hodžić D, Reberšek M, Kandušer M.

J Membr Biol. 2012 Oct;245(10):643-50. doi: 10.1007/s00232-012-9481-z. Epub 2012 Aug 3.

PMID:
22864453
11.

Considering effects of nanosecond pulsed electric fields on proteins.

Beebe SJ.

Bioelectrochemistry. 2015 Jun;103:52-9. doi: 10.1016/j.bioelechem.2014.08.014. Epub 2014 Aug 27.

PMID:
25218277
12.

Leukemic cell intracellular responses to nanosecond electric fields.

Chen N, Schoenbach KH, Kolb JF, James Swanson R, Garner AL, Yang J, Joshi RP, Beebe SJ.

Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2004 Apr 30;317(2):421-7.

PMID:
15063775
13.

Molecular Determinants of Tubulin's C-Terminal Tail Conformational Ensemble.

Wall KP, Pagratis M, Armstrong G, Balsbaugh JL, Verbeke E, Pearson CG, Hough LE.

ACS Chem Biol. 2016 Nov 18;11(11):2981-2990. Epub 2016 Sep 28.

14.

Molecular dynamics simulations of lipid membrane electroporation.

Delemotte L, Tarek M.

J Membr Biol. 2012 Sep;245(9):531-43. doi: 10.1007/s00232-012-9434-6. Epub 2012 May 30.

PMID:
22644388
15.

Monopole patch antenna for in vivo exposure to nanosecond pulsed electric fields.

Merla C, Apollonio F, Paffi A, Marino C, Vernier PT, Liberti M.

Med Biol Eng Comput. 2017 Jul;55(7):1073-1083. doi: 10.1007/s11517-016-1547-0. Epub 2016 Jul 15.

PMID:
27422130
16.

Communication: influence of nanosecond-pulsed electric fields on water and its subsequent relaxation: dipolar effects and debunking memory.

Avena M, Marracino P, Liberti M, Apollonio F, English NJ.

J Chem Phys. 2015 Apr 14;142(14):141101. doi: 10.1063/1.4917024.

PMID:
25877554
17.

Molecular Simulation of Cell Membrane Deformation by Picosecond Intense Electric Pulse.

Petrishia A, Sasikala M.

J Membr Biol. 2015 Dec;248(6):1015-20. doi: 10.1007/s00232-015-9812-y. Epub 2015 Jun 9.

PMID:
26054382
18.

Cell electrofusion based on nanosecond/microsecond pulsed electric fields.

Li C, Ke Q, Yao C, Mi Y, Liu H, Lv Y, Yao C.

PLoS One. 2018 May 24;13(5):e0197167. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197167. eCollection 2018.

19.

Calcium-independent disruption of microtubule dynamics by nanosecond pulsed electric fields in U87 human glioblastoma cells.

Carr L, Bardet SM, Burke RC, Arnaud-Cormos D, Leveque P, O'Connor RP.

Sci Rep. 2017 Jan 24;7:41267. doi: 10.1038/srep41267.

20.

Transmembrane molecular transport during versus after extremely large, nanosecond electric pulses.

Smith KC, Weaver JC.

Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2011 Aug 19;412(1):8-12. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2011.06.171. Epub 2011 Jul 2.

Supplemental Content

Support Center