Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 111

1.

Clinical improvement with intensive robot-assisted arm training in chronic stroke is unchanged by supplementary tDCS.

Edwards DJ, Cortes M, Rykman-Peltz A, Chang J, Elder J, Thickbroom G, Mariman JJ, Gerber LM, Oromendia C, Krebs HI, Fregni F, Volpe BT, Pascual-Leone A.

Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2019;37(2):167-180. doi: 10.3233/RNN-180869.

PMID:
30932903
2.

Raised corticomotor excitability of M1 forearm area following anodal tDCS is sustained during robotic wrist therapy in chronic stroke.

Edwards DJ, Krebs HI, Rykman A, Zipse J, Thickbroom GW, Mastaglia FL, Pascual-Leone A, Volpe BT.

Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2009;27(3):199-207. doi: 10.3233/RNN-2009-0470.

3.

Single Sessions of High-Definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Do Not Alter Lower Extremity Biomechanical or Corticomotor Response Variables Post-stroke.

Kindred JH, Kautz SA, Wonsetler EC, Bowden MG.

Front Neurosci. 2019 Apr 11;13:286. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2019.00286. eCollection 2019.

4.

The impact of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) combined with modified constraint-induced movement therapy (mCIMT) on upper limb function in chronic stroke: a double-blind randomized controlled trial.

Rocha S, Silva E, Foerster Á, Wiesiolek C, Chagas AP, Machado G, Baltar A, Monte-Silva K.

Disabil Rehabil. 2016;38(7):653-60. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2015.1055382. Epub 2015 Jun 10.

PMID:
26061222
5.

Robotic-assisted gait training combined with transcranial direct current stimulation in chronic stroke patients: A pilot double-blind, randomized controlled trial.

Seo HG, Lee WH, Lee SH, Yi Y, Kim KD, Oh BM.

Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2017;35(5):527-536. doi: 10.3233/RNN-170745.

PMID:
28800341
6.

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and robotic practice in chronic stroke: the dimension of timing.

Giacobbe V, Krebs HI, Volpe BT, Pascual-Leone A, Rykman A, Zeiarati G, Fregni F, Dipietro L, Thickbroom GW, Edwards DJ.

NeuroRehabilitation. 2013;33(1):49-56. doi: 10.3233/NRE-130927.

7.

Time configuration of combined neuromodulation and motor training after stroke: A proof-of-concept study.

Powell ES, Carrico C, Westgate PM, Chelette KC, Nichols L, Reddy L, Salyers E, Ward A, Sawaki L.

NeuroRehabilitation. 2016 Jul 15;39(3):439-49. doi: 10.3233/NRE-161375.

PMID:
27589514
8.

Revisiting interhemispheric imbalance in chronic stroke: A tDCS study.

McCambridge AB, Stinear JW, Byblow WD.

Clin Neurophysiol. 2018 Jan;129(1):42-50. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2017.10.016. Epub 2017 Oct 28.

PMID:
29145166
9.

The Association Between Reorganization of Bilateral M1 Topography and Function in Response to Early Intensive Hand Focused Upper Limb Rehabilitation Following Stroke Is Dependent on Ipsilesional Corticospinal Tract Integrity.

Yarossi M, Patel J, Qiu Q, Massood S, Fluet G, Merians A, Adamovich S, Tunik E.

Front Neurol. 2019 Mar 26;10:258. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00258. eCollection 2019.

10.

Corticospinal excitability as a predictor of functional gains at the affected upper limb following robotic training in chronic stroke survivors.

Milot MH, Spencer SJ, Chan V, Allington JP, Klein J, Chou C, Pearson-Fuhrhop K, Bobrow JE, Reinkensmeyer DJ, Cramer SC.

Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2014 Nov-Dec;28(9):819-27. doi: 10.1177/1545968314527351. Epub 2014 Mar 18.

11.

Intensity dependent effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on corticospinal excitability in chronic spinal cord injury.

Murray LM, Edwards DJ, Ruffini G, Labar D, Stampas A, Pascual-Leone A, Cortes M.

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015 Apr;96(4 Suppl):S114-21. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.11.004. Epub 2014 Nov 22.

12.

Effects of anodal and cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation combined with robotic therapy on severely affected arms in chronic stroke patients.

Ochi M, Saeki S, Oda T, Matsushima Y, Hachisuka K.

J Rehabil Med. 2013 Feb;45(2):137-40. doi: 10.2340/16501977-1099.

13.

A double-blinded randomised controlled trial exploring the effect of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation and uni-lateral robot therapy for the impaired upper limb in sub-acute and chronic stroke.

Triccas LT, Burridge JH, Hughes A, Verheyden G, Desikan M, Rothwell J.

NeuroRehabilitation. 2015;37(2):181-91. doi: 10.3233/NRE-151251.

PMID:
26484510
14.

Combined transcranial direct current stimulation and robotic upper limb therapy improves upper limb function in an adult with cerebral palsy.

Friel KM, Lee P, Soles LV, Smorenburg ARP, Kuo HC, Gupta D, Edwards DJ.

NeuroRehabilitation. 2017;41(1):41-50. doi: 10.3233/NRE-171455.

15.

tDCS does not enhance the effects of robot-assisted gait training in patients with subacute stroke.

Leon D, Cortes M, Elder J, Kumru H, Laxe S, Edwards DJ, Tormos JM, Bernabeu M, Pascual-Leone A.

Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2017;35(4):377-384. doi: 10.3233/RNN-170734.

PMID:
28697574
16.

Enhancement of Cortical Excitability and Lower Limb Motor Function in Patients With Stroke by Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation.

Chang MC, Kim DY, Park DH.

Brain Stimul. 2015 May-Jun;8(3):561-6. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2015.01.411. Epub 2015 Jan 31.

PMID:
25736569
17.

Bihemispheric brain stimulation facilitates motor recovery in chronic stroke patients.

Lindenberg R, Renga V, Zhu LL, Nair D, Schlaug G.

Neurology. 2010 Dec 14;75(24):2176-84. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318202013a. Epub 2010 Nov 10.

18.

Pattern of improvement in upper limb pointing task kinematics after a 3-month training program with robotic assistance in stroke.

Pila O, Duret C, Laborne FX, Gracies JM, Bayle N, Hutin E.

J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2017 Oct 13;14(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s12984-017-0315-1.

19.

Comparison of Neuroplastic Responses to Cathodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation in Subacute Stroke.

Nicolo P, Magnin C, Pedrazzini E, Plomp G, Mottaz A, Schnider A, Guggisberg AG.

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018 May;99(5):862-872.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.10.026. Epub 2017 Dec 7.

PMID:
29223708
20.

Supplemental Content

Support Center