Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 101

1.

Forensic genealogy: Some serious concerns.

Syndercombe Court D.

Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2018 Sep;36:203-204. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2018.07.011. Epub 2018 Jul 23.

PMID:
30048922
2.

The Golden State Killer investigation and the nascent field of forensic genealogy.

Phillips C.

Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2018 Sep;36:186-188. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2018.07.010. Epub 2018 Jul 17.

PMID:
30041097
3.

A response to the forensic genetics policy initiative's report "Establishing Best Practice for Forensic DNA Databases".

Samuel G, Howard HC, Cornel M, van El C, Hall A, Forzano F, Prainsack B.

Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2018 Sep;36:e19-e21. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2018.07.002. Epub 2018 Jul 5. No abstract available.

PMID:
30030012
4.

Genetic testing and individual rights.

Handelin B, Wachbroit R, Billings P, Scheck B, Reilly P, Milunsky A.

Suffolk Univ Law Rev. 1993 Winter;27(4):1477-97. No abstract available.

PMID:
11657046
5.

Family tree and ancestry inference: is there a need for a 'generational' consent?

Wallace SE, Gourna EG, Nikolova V, Sheehan NA.

BMC Med Ethics. 2015 Dec 9;16(1):87. doi: 10.1186/s12910-015-0080-2. Review.

6.

Dangerous intersections.

Korn D.

Issues Sci Technol. 1996 Fall;13(1):55-62. No abstract available.

PMID:
11654761
7.

Department of Defense DNA registry raises legal, ethical issues.

Mnookin S.

Genewatch. 1996 Aug;10(1):1, 3, 11. No abstract available.

PMID:
11656662
8.

Protecting genetic privacy.

Annas GJ.

Trial. 1994 Aug;30(8):43-44, 46. No abstract available.

PMID:
11654493
9.

Should police have access to genetic genealogy databases? Capturing the Golden State Killer and other criminals using a controversial new forensic technique.

Guerrini CJ, Robinson JO, Petersen D, McGuire AL.

PLoS Biol. 2018 Oct 2;16(10):e2006906. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2006906. eCollection 2018 Oct.

10.

Privacy concerns regarding government use of genetic information.

Dash JF.

J Biolaw Bus. 1999;2(4):46-54. No abstract available.

PMID:
11658225
11.

Genetic privacy: constitutional considerations in forensic DNA testing.

Burk DL, Hess JA.

Geoge Mason Univ Civ Rights Law J. 1994 Winter;5(1):1-53. No abstract available.

12.

Genetic information and property theory.

Barrad CM.

Northwest Univ Law Rev. 1993 Spring;87(3):1037-86. No abstract available.

PMID:
11656395
13.

Controls on DNA could impact research.

Kaiser J.

Science. 1996 Jul 19;273(5273):299. No abstract available.

PMID:
11644818
14.

Have the police hijacked our DNA?

[No authors listed]

Lancet. 2003 Sep 20;362(9388):927. No abstract available.

PMID:
14511920
15.

Liberty, privacy, and DNA databases.

Rosen C.

New Atlantis. 2003 Spring;(1):37-52. No abstract available.

PMID:
15584193
16.

Privacy and the Human Genome Project.

Wiesenthal DL, Wiener NI.

Ethics Behav. 1996;6(3):189-202.

PMID:
11654975
17.
18.

Human Genetics Commission calls for tougher rules on use and storage of genetic data.

Human Genetics Commission.

Hum Reprod Genet Ethics. 2003;9(1):3-4. No abstract available.

PMID:
14964203
19.

Criminal DNA data banks: revolution for law enforcement or threat to individual privacy?

Yee YH.

Am J Crim Law. 1995 Winter;22(2):461-90. No abstract available.

PMID:
11655161
20.

'Wonderment and dread': representations of DNA in ethical disputes about forensic DNA databases.

Williams R, Johnson P.

New Genet Soc. 2004 Aug;23(2):205-23.

PMID:
15460615

Supplemental Content

Support Center