Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 104

1.

Conservative management of cervical cancer: Current status and obstetrical implications.

Fokom Domgue J, Schmeler KM.

Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2019 Feb;55:79-92. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2018.06.009. Epub 2018 Jun 28. Review.

PMID:
30029960
2.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by large cone resection as fertility-sparing therapy in stage IB cervical cancer.

Salihi R, Leunen K, Van Limbergen E, Moerman P, Neven P, Vergote I.

Gynecol Oncol. 2015 Dec;139(3):447-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.05.043. Epub 2015 Jun 4.

PMID:
26050921
3.

Fertility results and pregnancy outcomes after conservative treatment of cervical cancer: a systematic review of the literature.

Bentivegna E, Maulard A, Pautier P, Chargari C, Gouy S, Morice P.

Fertil Steril. 2016 Oct;106(5):1195-1211.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.06.032. Epub 2016 Jul 16. Review.

PMID:
27430207
4.
5.

Oncological and pregnancy outcomes after high-dose density neoadjuvant chemotherapy and fertility-sparing surgery in cervical cancer.

Robova H, Halaska MJ, Pluta M, Skapa P, Matecha J, Lisy J, Rob L.

Gynecol Oncol. 2014 Nov;135(2):213-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.08.021. Epub 2014 Aug 23.

PMID:
25159484
6.

Management of low-risk early-stage cervical cancer: should conization, simple trachelectomy, or simple hysterectomy replace radical surgery as the new standard of care?

Ramirez PT, Pareja R, Rendón GJ, Millan C, Frumovitz M, Schmeler KM.

Gynecol Oncol. 2014 Jan;132(1):254-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.09.004. Epub 2013 Sep 14. Review.

7.

Fertility-sparing management in cervical cancer: balancing oncologic outcomes with reproductive success.

Willows K, Lennox G, Covens A.

Gynecol Oncol Res Pract. 2016 Oct 21;3:9. eCollection 2016. Review.

8.

Results of less radical fertility-sparing procedures with omitted parametrectomy for cervical cancer: 5years of experience.

Slama J, Cerny A, Dusek L, Fischerova D, Zikan M, Kocian R, Germanova A, Cibula D.

Gynecol Oncol. 2016 Sep;142(3):401-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.07.008. Epub 2016 Jul 7.

PMID:
27396943
9.

Clinical value of cold knife conization as conservative management in patients with microinvasive cervical squamous cell cancer (stage IA1).

He Y, Wu YM, Zhao Q, Wang T, Wang Y, Kong WM, Song F, Duan W, Zhu L, Zhang WY.

Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2014 Sep;24(7):1306-11. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000199.

PMID:
24987910
10.

Fertility-sparing surgery in early-stage cervical cancer patients: oncologic and reproductive outcomes.

Ditto A, Martinelli F, Bogani G, Fischetti M, Di Donato V, Lorusso D, Raspagliesi F.

Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2015 Mar;25(3):493-7. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000371.

PMID:
25628110
11.

Less radical surgery for early-stage cervical cancer: To what extent do we justify it?-Our belief.

Thomakos N, Trachana SP, Davidovic-Grigoraki M, Rodolakis A.

Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Aug;55(4):495-8. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2016.01.004. Review.

12.

Evolution in fertility-preserving options for early-stage cervical cancer: radical trachelectomy, simple trachelectomy, neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Plante M.

Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2013 Jul;23(6):982-9. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0b013e318295906b. Review.

PMID:
23792600
13.

Nerve-sparing radical abdominal trachelectomy versus nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy in early-stage (FIGO IA2-IB) cervical cancer: a comparative study on feasibility and outcome.

van Gent MD, van den Haak LW, Gaarenstroom KN, Peters AA, van Poelgeest MI, Trimbos JB, de Kroon CD.

Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2014 May;24(4):735-43. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000114.

PMID:
24651626
14.

[A retrospective study on the outcomes of the oncology, fertility and pregnancy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer after undergoing the fertility-sparing treatments].

Sun YX, Liu Q, Liu KJ, Li PQ, Hu ZJ.

Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2016 Jun 25;51(6):442-7. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-567X.2016.06.008. Chinese.

PMID:
27356480
15.

Fertility preservation by photodynamic therapy combined with conization in young patients with early stage cervical cancer: a pilot study.

Choi MC, Jung SG, Park H, Lee SY, Lee C, Hwang YY, Kim SJ.

Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2014 Sep;11(3):420-5. doi: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2014.06.001. Epub 2014 Jun 10.

PMID:
24927981
16.

Simple conization and lymphadenectomy for the conservative treatment of stage IB1 cervical cancer. An Italian experience.

Maneo A, Sideri M, Scambia G, Boveri S, Dell'anna T, Villa M, Parma G, Fagotti A, Fanfani F, Landoni F.

Gynecol Oncol. 2011 Dec;123(3):557-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.08.009. Epub 2011 Sep 9.

PMID:
21907396
17.

[Radical trachelectomy -- surgery for preserving woman's fertility in patients with invasive cervical cancer].

Kostov I, Vasilev N, Nacheva A, Lazarov I.

Akush Ginekol (Sofiia). 2013;52(7):27-30. Review. Bulgarian.

PMID:
24505637
18.

Excisional cone as fertility-sparing treatment in early-stage cervical cancer.

Fagotti A, Gagliardi ML, Moruzzi C, Carone V, Scambia G, Fanfani F.

Fertil Steril. 2011 Mar 1;95(3):1109-12. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.11.010. Epub 2010 Dec 3.

PMID:
21122837
19.

Fertility sparing treatment for in situ and early invasive adenocarcinoma of the cervix.

McHale MT, Le TD, Burger RA, Gu M, Rutgers JL, Monk BJ.

Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Nov;98(5 Pt 1):726-31.

PMID:
11704160
20.

Surgical management of early cervical cancer: the shape of future studies.

Greggi S, Scaffa C.

Curr Oncol Rep. 2012 Dec;14(6):527-34. doi: 10.1007/s11912-012-0269-1.

PMID:
22945452

Supplemental Content

Support Center