Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 103

1.

Australians' views on personal genomic testing: focus group findings from the Genioz study.

Metcalfe SA, Hickerton C, Savard J, Terrill B, Turbitt E, Gaff C, Gray K, Middleton A, Wilson B, Newson AJ.

Eur J Hum Genet. 2018 Aug;26(8):1101-1112. doi: 10.1038/s41431-018-0151-1. Epub 2018 Apr 30.

2.

Australians' perspectives on support around use of personal genomic testing: Findings from the Genioz study.

Metcalfe SA, Hickerton C, Savard J, Stackpoole E, Tytherleigh R, Tutty E, Terrill B, Turbitt E, Gray K, Middleton A, Wilson B, Newson AJ, Gaff C.

Eur J Med Genet. 2018 Nov 13. pii: S1769-7212(18)30438-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2018.11.002. [Epub ahead of print]

3.

Australians' views and experience of personal genomic testing: survey findings from the Genioz study.

Savard J, Hickerton C, Tytherleigh R, Terrill B, Turbitt E, Newson AJ, Wilson B, Gray K, Gaff C, Middleton A, Stackpoole E, Metcalfe SA.

Eur J Hum Genet. 2019 Jan 21. doi: 10.1038/s41431-018-0325-x. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
30666046
4.

Australians' knowledge and perceptions of direct-to-consumer personal genome testing.

Savard J, Mooney-Somers J, Newson AJ, Kerridge I.

Intern Med J. 2014 Jan;44(1):27-31. doi: 10.1111/imj.12289.

PMID:
24450520
5.

Consumer Health Informatics Aspects of Direct-to-Consumer Personal Genomic Testing.

Gray K, Stephen R, Terrill B, Wilson B, Middleton A, Tytherleigh R, Turbitt E, Gaff C, Savard J, Hickerton C, Newson A, Metcalfe S.

Stud Health Technol Inform. 2017;245:89-93.

PMID:
29295058
6.

Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: User Motivations, Decision Making, and Perceived Utility of Results.

Roberts JS, Gornick MC, Carere DA, Uhlmann WR, Ruffin MT, Green RC.

Public Health Genomics. 2017;20(1):36-45. doi: 10.1159/000455006. Epub 2017 Jan 10.

7.

Informing the Design of Direct-to-Consumer Interactive Personal Genomics Reports.

Shaer O, Nov O, Okerlund J, Balestra M, Stowell E, Ascher L, Bi J, Schlenker C, Ball M.

J Med Internet Res. 2015 Jun 12;17(6):e146. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4415.

8.

Utilization of Genetic Counseling after Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: Findings from the Impact of Personal Genomics (PGen) Study.

Koeller DR, Uhlmann WR, Carere DA, Green RC, Roberts JS; PGen Study Group.

J Genet Couns. 2017 Dec;26(6):1270-1279. doi: 10.1007/s10897-017-0106-7. Epub 2017 May 16.

9.

Paternity testing under the cloak of recreational genetics.

Moray N, Pink KE, Borry P, Larmuseau MH.

Eur J Hum Genet. 2017 Jun;25(6):768-770. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2017.31. Epub 2017 Mar 8.

10.

Attitudes to incorporating genomic risk assessments into population screening programs: the importance of purpose, context and deliberation.

Nicholls SG, Etchegary H, Carroll JC, Castle D, Lemyre L, Potter BK, Craigie S, Wilson BJ; CIHR Emerging Team in Genomics and Screening.

BMC Med Genomics. 2016 May 23;9(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s12920-016-0186-5.

11.

Consumer Perceptions of Interactions With Primary Care Providers After Direct-to-Consumer Personal Genomic Testing.

van der Wouden CH, Carere DA, Maitland-van der Zee AH, Ruffin MT 4th, Roberts JS, Green RC; Impact of Personal Genomics Study Group.

Ann Intern Med. 2016 Apr 19;164(8):513-22. doi: 10.7326/M15-0995. Epub 2016 Mar 1.

PMID:
26928821
12.

The health impacts of khat: a qualitative study among Somali-Australians.

Douglas H, Boyle M, Lintzeris N.

Med J Aust. 2011 Dec 19;195(11-12):666-9.

PMID:
22171861
13.

Genetic Testing Awareness and Attitudes among Latinos: Exploring Shared Perceptions and Gender-Based Differences.

Hamilton JG, Shuk E, Arniella G, González CJ, Gold GS, Gany F, Robson ME, Hay JL.

Public Health Genomics. 2016;19(1):34-46. doi: 10.1159/000441552. Epub 2015 Nov 11.

14.

Direct-to-consumer genomic testing: systematic review of the literature on user perspectives.

Goldsmith L, Jackson L, O'Connor A, Skirton H.

Eur J Hum Genet. 2012 Aug;20(8):811-6. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2012.18. Epub 2012 Feb 15. Review.

15.

The impact of direct-to-consumer personal genomic testing on perceived risk of breast, prostate, colorectal, and lung cancer: findings from the PGen study.

Carere DA, VanderWeele T, Moreno TA, Mountain JL, Roberts JS, Kraft P, Green RC; PGen Study Group.

BMC Med Genomics. 2015 Oct 15;8:63. doi: 10.1186/s12920-015-0140-y.

16.

Primary care providers' experiences with and perceptions of personalized genomic medicine.

Carroll JC, Makuwaza T, Manca DP, Sopcak N, Permaul JA, O'Brien MA, Heisey R, Eisenhauer EA, Easley J, Krzyzanowska MK, Miedema B, Pruthi S, Sawka C, Schneider N, Sussman J, Urquhart R, Versaevel C, Grunfeld E.

Can Fam Physician. 2016 Oct;62(10):e626-e635.

17.

Personal Genomic Testing for Cancer Risk: Results From the Impact of Personal Genomics Study.

Gray SW, Gollust SE, Carere DA, Chen CA, Cronin A, Kalia SS, Rana HQ, Ruffin MT 4th, Wang C, Roberts JS, Green RC.

J Clin Oncol. 2017 Feb 20;35(6):636-644. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.67.1503. Epub 2016 Dec 12.

18.

Awareness, attitudes and perspectives of direct-to-consumer genetic testing in Greece: a survey of potential consumers.

Mavroidopoulou V, Xera E, Mollaki V.

J Hum Genet. 2015 Sep;60(9):515-23. doi: 10.1038/jhg.2015.58. Epub 2015 Jun 4.

PMID:
26040209
19.

Playing a part in research? University students' attitudes to direct-to-consumer genomics.

Vayena E, Ineichen C, Stoupka E, Hafen E.

Public Health Genomics. 2014;17(3):158-68. doi: 10.1159/000360257. Epub 2014 Apr 25.

20.

A Community's Awareness and Perceptions of Genomic Medicine.

Hahn S, Letvak S, Powell K, Christianson C, Wallace D, Speer M, Lietz P, Blanton S, Vance J, Pericak-Vance M, Henrich VC; Genomedical Connection.

Public Health Genomics. 2010;13(2):63-71. doi: 10.1159/000218712. Epub 2009 May 13.

PMID:
19439917

Supplemental Content

Support Center