Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 137

1.

Reliability of the classification of proximal femur fractures: Does clinical experience matter?

Crijns TJ, Janssen SJ, Davis JT, Ring D, Sanchez HB; Science of Variation Group.

Injury. 2018 Apr;49(4):819-823. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2018.02.023. Epub 2018 Mar 15.

PMID:
29549969
2.

Reliability of the AO/ASIF classification for pertrochanteric femoral fractures.

Schipper IB, Steyerberg EW, Castelein RM, van Vugt AB.

Acta Orthop Scand. 2001 Feb;72(1):36-41.

PMID:
11327411
3.

Reliability and Reproducibility of the OTA/AO Classification for Humeral Shaft Fractures.

Mahabier KC, Van Lieshout EM, Van Der Schaaf BC, Roukema GR, Punt BJ, Verhofstad MH, Den Hartog D.

J Orthop Trauma. 2017 Mar;31(3):e75-e80. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000738.

PMID:
27755334
4.

Classifying intertrochanteric fractures of the proximal femur: does experience matter?

Fung W, Jonsson A, Buhren V, Bhandari M.

Med Princ Pract. 2007;16(3):198-202.

5.

Reliability of classification systems for intertrochanteric fractures of the proximal femur in experienced orthopaedic surgeons.

Jin WJ, Dai LY, Cui YM, Zhou Q, Jiang LS, Lu H.

Injury. 2005 Jul;36(7):858-61. Epub 2005 Apr 7.

PMID:
15949488
6.

Evaluation of inter- and intra-observer reliability of current classification systems for subtrochanteric femoral fractures.

İmerci A, Aydogan NH, Tosun K.

Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2018 Apr;28(3):499-502. doi: 10.1007/s00590-017-2065-y. Epub 2017 Nov 6.

PMID:
29110093
7.

Classification of trochanteric fracture of the proximal femur: a study of the reliability of current systems.

Pervez H, Parker MJ, Pryor GA, Lutchman L, Chirodian N.

Injury. 2002 Oct;33(8):713-5.

PMID:
12213423
8.

Treatment With the SIGN Nail in Closed Diaphyseal Femur Fractures Results in Acceptable Radiographic Alignment.

Carsen S, Park SS, Simon DA, Feibel RJ.

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Jul;473(7):2394-401. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4290-1. Epub 2015 Apr 17.

9.

Interobserver reliability of classification and characterization of proximal humeral fractures: a comparison of two and three-dimensional CT.

Bruinsma WE, Guitton TG, Warner JJ, Ring D; Science of Variation Group.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 Sep 4;95(17):1600-4. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.00586.

PMID:
24005201
10.

Gunshot femoral shaft fractures: is the current classification system reliable?

Shepherd LE, Zalavras CG, Jaki K, Shean C, Patzakis MJ.

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003 Mar;(408):101-9.

PMID:
12616045
11.

Is surgeons' experience important on intra- and inter-observer reliability of classifications used for adult femoral neck fracture?

Turgut A, Kumbaracı M, Kalenderer Ö, İlyas G, Bacaksız T, Karapınar L.

Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2016 Dec;50(6):601-605. doi: 10.1016/j.aott.2015.11.004. Epub 2016 Nov 23.

12.

High reliability in classification of tibia fractures in the Swedish Fracture Register.

Wennergren D, Ekholm C, Sundfeldt M, Karlsson J, Bhandari M, Möller M.

Injury. 2016 Feb;47(2):478-82. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.11.002. Epub 2015 Nov 10.

PMID:
26620119
13.

Letournel classification for acetabular fractures. Assessment of interobserver and intraobserver reliability.

Beaulé PE, Dorey FJ, Matta JM.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003 Sep;85-A(9):1704-9.

PMID:
12954828
14.

The comparison of two classifications for trochanteric femur fractures: the AO/ASIF classification and the Jensen classification.

van Embden D, Rhemrev SJ, Meylaerts SA, Roukema GR.

Injury. 2010 Apr;41(4):377-81. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2009.10.007. Epub 2009 Nov 10.

PMID:
19906370
15.
16.

Intraobserver and interobserver reliability and the role of fracture morphology in classifying femoral shaft fractures in young children.

Thompson NB, Kelly DM, Warner WC Jr, Rush JK, Moisan A, Hanna WR Jr, Beaty JH, Spence DD, Sawyer JR.

J Pediatr Orthop. 2014 Apr-May;34(3):352-8. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000000095.

PMID:
24172678
17.

The value of CT compared to radiographs in the classification and treatment plan of trochanteric fractures.

van Embden D, Scheurkogel MM, Schipper IB, Rhemrev SJ, Meylaerts SA.

Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2016 Aug;136(8):1091-7. doi: 10.1007/s00402-016-2475-z. Epub 2016 Jun 30.

PMID:
27365082
18.

Variations of treatment in selected proximal femur fractures among surgeons with different surgical experience--A survey at an international AO course.

Sciacca S, Lidder SS, Grechenig C, Grechenig S, Staresinic M, Bakota B, Gänsslen A.

Injury. 2015 Nov;46 Suppl 6:S57-60. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.10.066. Epub 2015 Nov 18.

PMID:
26603615
19.

The reliability and validity of the Unified Classification System of periprosthetic femoral fractures after hip arthroplasty.

Huang JF, Chen JJ, Shen JJ, Du WX, Liu FC, Tong PJ.

Acta Orthop Belg. 2016 Aug;82(2):233-239.

PMID:
27682284
20.

Is there any purpose in classifying subtrochanteric fractures? The reproducibility of four classification systems.

Guyver PM, McCarthy MJ, Jain NP, Poulter RJ, McAllen CJ, Keenan J.

Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2014 May;24(4):513-8. doi: 10.1007/s00590-011-0780-3. Epub 2011 Mar 30.

PMID:
23412146

Supplemental Content

Support Center