Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 119

1.

Shifts of visuospatial attention do not cause the spatial distortions of the Roelofs effect.

Lester BD, Dassonville P.

J Vis. 2013 Oct 8;13(12). pii: 4. doi: 10.1167/13.12.4.

PMID:
24105425
2.

Attentional control settings modulate susceptibility to the induced Roelofs effect.

Lester BD, Dassonville P.

Atten Percept Psychophys. 2011 Jul;73(5):1398-406. doi: 10.3758/s13414-011-0123-9.

3.

Perception, action, and Roelofs effect: a mere illusion of dissociation.

Dassonville P, Bala JK.

PLoS Biol. 2004 Nov;2(11):e364. Epub 2004 Oct 26.

4.

Fragments of the Roelofs effect: a bottom-up effect equal to the sum of its parts.

Walter E, Dassonville P.

Percept Psychophys. 2006 Nov;68(8):1243-53.

PMID:
17378411
5.

Shifts of spatial attention in perceived 3-D space.

Han S, Wan X, Humphreys GW.

Q J Exp Psychol A. 2005 May;58(4):753-64.

PMID:
16104105
6.

Interactions between voluntary and stimulus-driven spatial attention mechanisms across sensory modalities.

Santangelo V, Olivetti Belardinelli M, Spence C, Macaluso E.

J Cogn Neurosci. 2009 Dec;21(12):2384-97. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2008.21178.

PMID:
19199406
7.

The Roelofs and induced Roelofs effects.

Bridgeman B, Dassonville P, Lester BD.

Conscious Cogn. 2018 Jun 6. pii: S1053-8100(18)30040-0. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2018.05.009. [Epub ahead of print] Review.

PMID:
29886012
8.

Neural mechanisms of attentional shifts due to irrelevant spatial and numerical cues.

Ranzini M, Dehaene S, Piazza M, Hubbard EM.

Neuropsychologia. 2009 Oct;47(12):2615-24. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.05.011. Epub 2009 May 22.

PMID:
19465038
9.

The induced Roelofs effect: two visual systems or the shift of a single reference frame?

Dassonville P, Bridgeman B, Kaur Bala J, Thiem P, Sampanes A.

Vision Res. 2004 Mar;44(6):603-11.

10.

Masked stimuli modulate endogenous shifts of spatial attention.

Palmer S, Mattler U.

Conscious Cogn. 2013 Jun;22(2):486-503. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2013.02.008. Epub 2013 Mar 22.

PMID:
23528730
11.

Going rogue in the spatial cuing paradigm: high spatial validity is insufficient to elicit voluntary shifts of attention.

Davis GJ, Gibson BS.

J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2012 Oct;38(5):1192-201. Epub 2012 Mar 5.

PMID:
22390290
12.

Paradoxical cross-over due to attention to high or low spatial frequencies.

Niemeier M, Stojanoski B, Singh VW, Chu E.

Brain Cogn. 2008 Jun;67(1):115-25. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2007.12.002. Epub 2008 Feb 20.

PMID:
18243459
13.

Visuospatial contextual processing in the parietal cortex: an fMRI investigation of the induced Roelofs effect.

Walter E, Dassonville P.

Neuroimage. 2008 Oct 1;42(4):1686-97. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.06.016. Epub 2008 Jun 25.

14.

Spatial distortion induced by imperceptible visual stimuli.

Au RK, Ono F, Watanabe K.

Conscious Cogn. 2013 Mar;22(1):99-110. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2012.11.010. Epub 2012 Dec 20.

PMID:
23262255
15.

Where does attention go when it moves? Spatial properties and locus of the attentional repulsion effect.

Kosovicheva AA, Fortenbaugh FC, Robertson LC.

J Vis. 2010 Oct 27;10(12):33. doi: 10.1167/10.12.33.

16.
17.
18.

Modulating the attentional repulsion effect.

Pratt J, Arnott SR.

Acta Psychol (Amst). 2008 Jan;127(1):137-45. Epub 2007 May 8.

PMID:
17490594
19.

The footprints of visual attention during search with 100% valid and 100% invalid cues.

Eckstein MP, Pham BT, Shimozaki SS.

Vision Res. 2004 Jun;44(12):1193-207.

20.

Beyond attentional bias: a perceptual bias in a dot-probe task.

Bocanegra BR, Huijding J, Zeelenberg R.

Emotion. 2012 Dec;12(6):1362-6. doi: 10.1037/a0028415. Epub 2012 May 28.

PMID:
22642346

Supplemental Content

Support Center