Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 127

1.

Attentional control settings modulate susceptibility to the induced Roelofs effect.

Lester BD, Dassonville P.

Atten Percept Psychophys. 2011 Jul;73(5):1398-406. doi: 10.3758/s13414-011-0123-9.

2.

Shifts of visuospatial attention do not cause the spatial distortions of the Roelofs effect.

Lester BD, Dassonville P.

J Vis. 2013 Oct 8;13(12). pii: 4. doi: 10.1167/13.12.4.

PMID:
24105425
3.

Perception, action, and Roelofs effect: a mere illusion of dissociation.

Dassonville P, Bala JK.

PLoS Biol. 2004 Nov;2(11):e364. Epub 2004 Oct 26.

4.

The Roelofs and induced Roelofs effects.

Bridgeman B, Dassonville P, Lester BD.

Conscious Cogn. 2018 Jun 6. pii: S1053-8100(18)30040-0. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2018.05.009. [Epub ahead of print] Review.

PMID:
29886012
5.

Modulating the attentional repulsion effect.

Pratt J, Arnott SR.

Acta Psychol (Amst). 2008 Jan;127(1):137-45. Epub 2007 May 8.

PMID:
17490594
6.

The induced Roelofs effect: two visual systems or the shift of a single reference frame?

Dassonville P, Bridgeman B, Kaur Bala J, Thiem P, Sampanes A.

Vision Res. 2004 Mar;44(6):603-11.

7.

Target-uncertainty effects in attentional capture: color-singleton set or multiple attentional control settings?

Folk CL, Anderson BA.

Psychon Bull Rev. 2010 Jun;17(3):421-6. doi: 10.3758/PBR.17.3.421.

PMID:
20551369
8.
9.

Fragments of the Roelofs effect: a bottom-up effect equal to the sum of its parts.

Walter E, Dassonville P.

Percept Psychophys. 2006 Nov;68(8):1243-53.

PMID:
17378411
10.

The costs of switching attentional sets.

Dombrowe I, Donk M, Olivers CN.

Atten Percept Psychophys. 2011 Nov;73(8):2481-8. doi: 10.3758/s13414-011-0198-3.

11.

Feature-based attention to unconscious shapes and colors.

Schmidt F, Schmidt T.

Atten Percept Psychophys. 2010 Aug;72(6):1480-94. doi: 10.3758/APP.72.6.1480.

PMID:
20675795
12.

A static color discontinuity can capture spatial attention when the target is an abrupt-onset singleton.

Burnham BR, Neely JH.

J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2008 Aug;34(4):831-41. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.34.4.831.

PMID:
18665729
13.

Variations in the magnitude of attentional capture: testing a two-process model.

Anderson BA, Folk CL.

Atten Percept Psychophys. 2010 Feb;72(2):342-52. doi: 10.3758/APP.72.2.342.

PMID:
20139450
14.
15.

Expectancies modulate attentional capture by salient color singletons.

Geyer T, Müller HJ, Krummenacher J.

Vision Res. 2008 May;48(11):1315-26. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2008.02.006. Epub 2008 Apr 14.

16.

Involuntary transfer of a top-down attentional set into the focus of attention: evidence from a contingent attentional capture paradigm.

Moore KS, Weissman DH.

Atten Percept Psychophys. 2010 Aug;72(6):1495-509. doi: 10.3758/APP.72.6.1495.

PMID:
20675796
17.

Independent, synchronous access to color and motion features.

Holcombe AO, Cavanagh P.

Cognition. 2008 May;107(2):552-80. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.11.006. Epub 2008 Jan 18.

18.

The box alignment illusion: an orientation illusion induced by pictorial depth.

Enns JT, Coren S.

Percept Psychophys. 1995 Nov;57(8):1163-74.

PMID:
8539091
19.

Overriding age differences in attentional capture with top-down processing.

Whiting WL, Madden DJ, Babcock KJ.

Psychol Aging. 2007 Jun;22(2):223-32.

20.

Breaking through the attentional window: capture by abrupt onsets versus color singletons.

Gaspelin N, Ruthruff E, Lien MC, Jung K.

Atten Percept Psychophys. 2012 Oct;74(7):1461-74.

PMID:
22806409

Supplemental Content

Support Center