Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Best matches for uterine cervix cancer AND (free full text[sb] AND:

Search results

Items: 1 to 20 of 14487

  • The following terms were ignored: (, AND
  • See the search details.
1.

Comparison of cervical cancer screening among women with and without hysterectomies: a nationwide population-based study in Korea.

Shin JY, Choi KS, Suh M, Park B, Jun JK.

BMC Cancer. 2018 Aug 11;18(1):810. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4723-9.

2.

Case report on rhabdomyolysis after minimally invasive surgery for squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix and adhesions due to deep infiltrating endometriosis.

Steinmacher S, Abele H, Brucker SY, Taran FA.

Case Rep Womens Health. 2018 Jun 23;19:e00069. doi: 10.1016/j.crwh.2018.e00069. eCollection 2018 Jul.

3.

Prognostic significance of PIK3CA mutation in stage IIB to IVA cervical cancers treated by concurrent chemoradiotherapy with weekly cisplatin.

Lachkar B, Minaguchi T, Akiyama A, Liu S, Zhang S, Xu C, Shikama A, Tasaka N, Sakurai M, Nakao S, Ochi H, Yoshikawa H, Satoh T.

Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Aug;97(31):e11392. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000011392.

4.

The Prevalence of Genus Alpha Human Papillomavirus in Women with Uterine Cervical Infection and/or Inflammation in Western Iran.

Mirbahari SG, Sadeghi M.

Mater Sociomed. 2018 Jun;30(2):113-117. doi: 10.5455/msm.2018.30.113-117.

5.

Treatment outcomes of high-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy for cervical cancer: a comparison of Ir-192 versus Co-60 sources.

Tantivatana T, Rongsriyam K.

J Gynecol Oncol. 2018 Sep;29(5):e86. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2018.29.e86.

6.

Prognostic significance of lymph node ratio in node-positive cervical cancer patients.

Joo JH, Kim YS, Nam JH.

Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Jul;97(30):e11711. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000011711.

7.

Disease-free survival after robotic-assisted laparoscopic total pelvic exenteration for recurrent cervical adenocarcinoma: A case report.

Yang Q, Tang J, Xiao L.

Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Jul;97(30):e11611. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000011611.

8.

Differential expression of neuroendocrine markers, TTF-1, p53, and Ki-67 in cervical and pulmonary small cell carcinoma.

Liu H, Zhang Y, Chang J, Liu Z, Tang N.

Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Jul;97(30):e11604. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000011604.

9.

Chemoradiotherapy completion and neutropenia risk in HIV patients with cervical cancer.

Vendrell I, Ferreira AR, Abrunhosa-Branquinho AN, Semedo PM, Pulido CF, Jorge M, Pina MF, Pinto C, Costa L.

Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Jul;97(30):e11592. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000011592.

10.

Treatment outcomes of locally advanced cervical cancer by histopathological types in a single institution: A propensity score matching study.

Yin KC, Lu CH, Lin JC, Hsu CY, Wang L.

J Formos Med Assoc. 2018 Jul 16. pii: S0929-6646(18)30002-0. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2018.07.002. [Epub ahead of print]

11.

The diagnostic accuracy of a real-time optoelectronic device in cervical cancer screening: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis.

Yang H, Zhang X, Hao Z.

Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Jul;97(29):e11439. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000011439. Review.

12.

Using low-coverage whole genome sequencing technique to analyze the chromosomal copy number alterations in the exfoliative cells of cervical cancer.

Ren T, Suo J, Liu S, Wang S, Shu S, Xiang Y, Lang JH.

J Gynecol Oncol. 2018 Sep;29(5):e78. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2018.29.e78. Epub 2018 Jun 29.

13.

The influence of surgeon volume on outcomes after pelvic exenteration for a gynecologic cancer.

Jalloul RJ, Nick AM, Munsell MF, Westin SN, Ramirez PT, Frumovitz M, Soliman PT.

J Gynecol Oncol. 2018 Sep;29(5):e68. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2018.29.e68. Epub 2018 May 4.

14.

Primary malignant melanoma of the uterine cervix treated with pembrolizumab after radical surgery: a case report and literature review.

Kim MS, Choi CH, Kim TJ, Lee JW, Lee J, Bae DS, Kim BG.

Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2018 Jul;61(4):524-528. doi: 10.5468/ogs.2018.61.4.524. Epub 2018 Jul 5.

15.

Clinical factors that affect diagnostic discrepancy between colposcopically directed biopsies and loop electrosurgical excision procedure conization of the uterine cervix.

Jung Y, Lee AR, Lee SJ, Lee YS, Park DC, Park EK.

Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2018 Jul;61(4):477-488. doi: 10.5468/ogs.2018.61.4.477. Epub 2018 Jun 28.

16.

Potential new biomarkers for squamous carcinoma of the uterine cervix.

van Dam PA, Rolfo C, Ruiz R, Pauwels P, Van Berckelaer C, Trinh XB, Ferri Gandia J, Bogers JP, Van Laere S.

ESMO Open. 2018 Jun 28;3(4):e000352. doi: 10.1136/esmoopen-2018-000352. eCollection 2018.

17.

Relationship of genetic variant distributions of WW domain-containing oxidoreductase gene with uterine cervical cancer.

Lin YH, Hsiao YH, Wu WJ, Yang SF, Hsu CF, Kang YT, Wang PH.

Int J Med Sci. 2018 Jun 14;15(10):1005-1013. doi: 10.7150/ijms.25553. eCollection 2018.

18.

Primary malignant mixed Müllerian tumors of the fallopian tube with cervix metastasis: A rare case report and literature review.

Zhang Q, Liu A, Wu JJ, Niu M, Zhao Y, Tian SF, Chen A, Zhong L.

Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Jul;97(28):e11311. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000011311.

19.

Breast and cervical cancer survival at Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Colombia.

Pardo C, de Vries E.

Colomb Med (Cali). 2018 Mar 30;49(1):102-108. doi: 10.25100/cm.v49i1.2840.

20.

Is It Time to Move Beyond Visual Inspection With Acetic Acid for Cervical Cancer Screening?

Silkensen SL, Schiffman M, Sahasrabuddhe V, Flanigan JS.

Glob Health Sci Pract. 2018 Jun 29;6(2):242-246. doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-18-00206. Print 2018 Jun 27. No abstract available.

Supplemental Content

Loading ...
Support Center