Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 251

1.

Online and offline effects of cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation on motor learning in healthy older adults: a randomized double-blind sham-controlled study.

Samaei A, Ehsani F, Zoghi M, Hafez Yosephi M, Jaberzadeh S.

Eur J Neurosci. 2017 May;45(9):1177-1185. doi: 10.1111/ejn.13559. Epub 2017 Apr 3.

PMID:
28278354
2.

Differential effects of primary motor cortex and cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation on motor learning in healthy individuals: A randomized double-blind sham-controlled study.

Ehsani F, Bakhtiary AH, Jaberzadeh S, Talimkhani A, Hajihasani A.

Neurosci Res. 2016 Nov;112:10-19. doi: 10.1016/j.neures.2016.06.003. Epub 2016 Jun 24.

PMID:
27349154
3.
4.

Facilitating myoelectric-control with transcranial direct current stimulation: a preliminary study in healthy humans.

Dutta A, Paulus W, Nitsche MA.

J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2014 Feb 10;11:13. doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-11-13.

5.

Modulating human procedural learning by cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation.

Ferrucci R, Brunoni AR, Parazzini M, Vergari M, Rossi E, Fumagalli M, Mameli F, Rosa M, Giannicola G, Zago S, Priori A.

Cerebellum. 2013 Aug;12(4):485-92. doi: 10.1007/s12311-012-0436-9.

PMID:
23328908
6.

Polarity independent effects of cerebellar tDCS on short term ankle visuomotor learning.

Shah B, Nguyen TT, Madhavan S.

Brain Stimul. 2013 Nov;6(6):966-8. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2013.04.008. Epub 2013 May 17.

PMID:
23711765
7.

Cerebellar direct current stimulation enhances on-line motor skill acquisition through an effect on accuracy.

Cantarero G, Spampinato D, Reis J, Ajagbe L, Thompson T, Kulkarni K, Celnik P.

J Neurosci. 2015 Feb 18;35(7):3285-90. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2885-14.2015.

8.

The effects of cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation on static and dynamic postural stability in older individuals: a randomized double-blind sham-controlled study.

Ehsani F, Samaei A, Zoghi M, Hedayati R, Jaberzadeh S.

Eur J Neurosci. 2017 Dec;46(12):2875-2884. doi: 10.1111/ejn.13731. Epub 2017 Nov 6.

PMID:
28973782
9.

Cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation interacts with BDNF Val66Met in motor learning.

van der Vliet R, Jonker ZD, Louwen SC, Heuvelman M, de Vreede L, Ribbers GM, De Zeeuw CI, Donchin O, Selles RW, van der Geest JN, Frens MA.

Brain Stimul. 2018 Jul - Aug;11(4):759-771. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2018.04.009. Epub 2018 Apr 11.

10.

Long term clinical and neurophysiological effects of cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation in patients with neurodegenerative ataxia.

Benussi A, Dell'Era V, Cotelli MS, Turla M, Casali C, Padovani A, Borroni B.

Brain Stimul. 2017 Mar - Apr;10(2):242-250. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2016.11.001. Epub 2016 Nov 3.

PMID:
27838276
11.

The Effect of Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on A Throwing Task Depends on Individual Level of Task Performance.

Mizuguchi N, Katayama T, Kanosue K.

Neuroscience. 2018 Feb 10;371:119-125. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2017.11.048. Epub 2017 Dec 6.

PMID:
29223349
12.

BDNF Val66Met but not transcranial direct current stimulation affects motor learning after stroke.

van der Vliet R, Ribbers GM, Vandermeeren Y, Frens MA, Selles RW.

Brain Stimul. 2017 Sep - Oct;10(5):882-892. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2017.07.004. Epub 2017 Jul 13.

PMID:
28751226
13.

Transcranial Direct-Current Stimulation Can Enhance Motor Learning in Children.

Ciechanski P, Kirton A.

Cereb Cortex. 2017 May 1;27(5):2758-2767. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhw114.

PMID:
27166171
14.
15.

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Enhances Motor Skill Learning but Not Generalization in Chronic Stroke.

Hamoudi M, Schambra HM, Fritsch B, Schoechlin-Marx A, Weiller C, Cohen LG, Reis J.

Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2018 Apr-May;32(4-5):295-308. doi: 10.1177/1545968318769164. Epub 2018 Apr 22.

PMID:
29683030
16.

Transcranial direct current stimulation over multiple days enhances motor performance of a grip task.

Fan J, Voisin J, Milot MH, Higgins J, Boudrias MH.

Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2017 Sep;60(5):329-333. doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2017.07.001. Epub 2017 Aug 7.

17.

Intensity dependent effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on corticospinal excitability in chronic spinal cord injury.

Murray LM, Edwards DJ, Ruffini G, Labar D, Stampas A, Pascual-Leone A, Cortes M.

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015 Apr;96(4 Suppl):S114-21. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.11.004. Epub 2014 Nov 22.

18.

Monitoring transcranial direct current stimulation induced changes in cortical excitability during the serial reaction time task.

Ambrus GG, Chaieb L, Stilling R, Rothkegel H, Antal A, Paulus W.

Neurosci Lett. 2016 Mar 11;616:98-104. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2016.01.039. Epub 2016 Jan 28.

PMID:
26826607
19.

Enhancing Consolidation of a New Temporal Motor Skill by Cerebellar Noninvasive Stimulation.

Wessel MJ, Zimerman M, Timmermann JE, Heise KF, Gerloff C, Hummel FC.

Cereb Cortex. 2016 Apr;26(4):1660-7. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhu335. Epub 2015 Jan 20.

PMID:
25604611
20.

Effects of a common transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) protocol on motor evoked potentials found to be highly variable within individuals over 9 testing sessions.

Horvath JC, Vogrin SJ, Carter O, Cook MJ, Forte JD.

Exp Brain Res. 2016 Sep;234(9):2629-42. doi: 10.1007/s00221-016-4667-8. Epub 2016 May 5.

PMID:
27150317

Supplemental Content

Support Center