Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Search results

Items: 17

1.

Changing abilities vs. changing tasks: Examining validity degradation with test scores and college performance criteria both assessed longitudinally.

Dahlke JA, Kostal JW, Sackett PR, Kuncel NR.

J Appl Psychol. 2018 May 3. doi: 10.1037/apl0000316. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
29723000
2.

Effects of predictor weighting methods on incremental validity.

Sackett PR, Dahlke JA, Shewach OR, Kuncel NR.

J Appl Psychol. 2017 Oct;102(10):1421-1434. doi: 10.1037/apl0000235. Epub 2017 May 22.

PMID:
28530417
3.

Individual differences and their measurement: A review of 100 years of research.

Sackett PR, Lievens F, Van Iddekinge CH, Kuncel NR.

J Appl Psychol. 2017 Mar;102(3):254-273. doi: 10.1037/apl0000151. Epub 2017 Feb 2. Review.

PMID:
28150988
4.

Why women perform better in college than admission scores would predict: Exploring the roles of conscientiousness and course-taking patterns.

Keiser HN, Sackett PR, Kuncel NR, Brothen T.

J Appl Psychol. 2016 Apr;101(4):569-81. doi: 10.1037/apl0000069. Epub 2015 Dec 14.

PMID:
26653526
5.

Mechanical versus clinical data combination in selection and admissions decisions: a meta-analysis.

Kuncel NR, Klieger DM, Connelly BS, Ones DS.

J Appl Psychol. 2013 Nov;98(6):1060-72. doi: 10.1037/a0034156. Epub 2013 Sep 16.

PMID:
24041118
6.

Resolving the assessment center construct validity problem (as we know it).

Kuncel NR, Sackett PR.

J Appl Psychol. 2014 Jan;99(1):38-47. doi: 10.1037/a0034147. Epub 2013 Aug 19.

PMID:
23957688
7.

The role of socioeconomic status in SAT-grade relationships and in college admissions decisions.

Sackett PR, Kuncel NR, Beatty AS, Rigdon JL, Shen W, Kiger TB.

Psychol Sci. 2012 Sep 1;23(9):1000-7. doi: 10.1177/0956797612438732. Epub 2012 Aug 2.

PMID:
22858524
8.

A Plea for Process in Personality Prevarication.

Kuncel NR, Goldberg LR, Kiger T.

Hum Perf Extrem Environ. 2011 Sep 15;24(4):373-378.

9.

The predictive validity of nursing admission measures for performance on the National Council Licensure Examination: a meta-analysis.

Grossbach A, Kuncel NR.

J Prof Nurs. 2011 Mar-Apr;27(2):124-8. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2010.09.010.

PMID:
21420045
10.

Does socioeconomic status explain the relationship between admissions tests and post-secondary academic performance?

Sackett PR, Kuncel NR, Arneson JJ, Cooper SR, Waters SD.

Psychol Bull. 2009 Jan;135(1):1-22. doi: 10.1037/a0013978.

PMID:
19210051
11.

Study Habits, Skills, and Attitudes: The Third Pillar Supporting Collegiate Academic Performance.

Credé M, Kuncel NR.

Perspect Psychol Sci. 2008 Nov;3(6):425-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00089.x.

PMID:
26158971
12.

The Power of Personality: The Comparative Validity of Personality Traits, Socioeconomic Status, and Cognitive Ability for Predicting Important Life Outcomes.

Roberts BW, Kuncel NR, Shiner R, Caspi A, Goldberg LR.

Perspect Psychol Sci. 2007 Dec;2(4):313-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00047.x.

13.
14.

Selective citation mars conclusions about test validity and predictive bias.

Kuncel NR, Sackett PR.

Am Psychol. 2007 Feb-Mar;62(2):145-6. No abstract available.

PMID:
17324044
15.

Assessment. Standardized tests predict graduate students' success.

Kuncel NR, Hezlett SA.

Science. 2007 Feb 23;315(5815):1080-1. No abstract available.

PMID:
17322046
16.

Academic performance, career potential, creativity, and job performance: can one construct predict them all?

Kuncel NR, Hezlett SA, Ones DS.

J Pers Soc Psychol. 2004 Jan;86(1):148-61.

PMID:
14717633

Supplemental Content

Loading ...
Support Center