Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Search results

Items: 19

1.

The occipital face area is causally involved in the formation of identity-specific face representations.

Ambrus GG, Dotzer M, Schweinberger SR, Kovács G.

Brain Struct Funct. 2017 Dec;222(9):4271-4282. doi: 10.1007/s00429-017-1467-2. Epub 2017 Jul 11.

PMID:
28699028
2.

Causal evidence of the involvement of the right occipital face area in face-identity acquisition.

Ambrus GG, Windel F, Burton AM, Kovács G.

Neuroimage. 2017 Mar 1;148:212-218. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.01.043. Epub 2017 Jan 18.

PMID:
28110089
3.

Alternating Current Stimulation for Vision Restoration after Optic Nerve Damage: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Gall C, Schmidt S, Schittkowski MP, Antal A, Ambrus GG, Paulus W, Dannhauer M, Michalik R, Mante A, Bola M, Lux A, Kropf S, Brandt SA, Sabel BA.

PLoS One. 2016 Jun 29;11(6):e0156134. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156134. eCollection 2016.

4.

Causal evidence of the involvement of the number form area in the visual detection of numbers and letters.

Grotheer M, Ambrus GG, Kovács G.

Neuroimage. 2016 May 15;132:314-319. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.02.069. Epub 2016 Mar 2.

PMID:
26940623
5.

Monitoring transcranial direct current stimulation induced changes in cortical excitability during the serial reaction time task.

Ambrus GG, Chaieb L, Stilling R, Rothkegel H, Antal A, Paulus W.

Neurosci Lett. 2016 Mar 11;616:98-104. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2016.01.039. Epub 2016 Jan 28.

PMID:
26826607
6.

Bi-frontal transcranial alternating current stimulation in the ripple range reduced overnight forgetting.

Ambrus GG, Pisoni A, Primaßin A, Turi Z, Paulus W, Antal A.

Front Cell Neurosci. 2015 Sep 24;9:374. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2015.00374. eCollection 2015.

7.

The impact of electrical stimulation techniques on behavior.

Antal A, Ambrus GG, Chaieb L.

Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2014 Nov;5(6):649-659. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1319. Epub 2014 Sep 17.

PMID:
26308871
8.

Separating recognition processes of declarative memory via anodal tDCS: boosting old item recognition by temporal and new item detection by parietal stimulation.

Pisoni A, Turi Z, Raithel A, Ambrus GG, Alekseichuk I, Schacht A, Paulus W, Antal A.

PLoS One. 2015 Mar 27;10(3):e0123085. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0123085. eCollection 2015.

9.

Double dissociation of working memory and attentional processes in smokers and non-smokers with and without nicotine.

Grundey J, Amu R, Ambrus GG, Batsikadze G, Paulus W, Nitsche MA.

Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2015 Jul;232(14):2491-501. doi: 10.1007/s00213-015-3880-7. Epub 2015 Feb 27.

PMID:
25721074
10.

Right hemisphere advantage in statistical learning: evidence from a probabilistic sequence learning task.

Janacsek K, Ambrus GG, Paulus W, Antal A, Nemeth D.

Brain Stimul. 2015 Mar-Apr;8(2):277-82. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2014.11.008. Epub 2014 Nov 21.

PMID:
25499036
11.

Toward unraveling reading-related modulations of tDCS-induced neuroplasticity in the human visual cortex.

Antal A, Ambrus GG, Chaieb L.

Front Psychol. 2014 Jun 20;5:642. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00642. eCollection 2014.

12.

When size matters: large electrodes induce greater stimulation-related cutaneous discomfort than smaller electrodes at equivalent current density.

Turi Z, Ambrus GG, Ho KA, Sengupta T, Paulus W, Antal A.

Brain Stimul. 2014 May-Jun;7(3):460-7. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2014.01.059. Epub 2014 Feb 5.

PMID:
24582373
13.

Brain-derived neurotrophic factor: its impact upon neuroplasticity and neuroplasticity inducing transcranial brain stimulation protocols.

Chaieb L, Antal A, Ambrus GG, Paulus W.

Neurogenetics. 2014 Mar;15(1):1-11. doi: 10.1007/s10048-014-0393-1. Epub 2014 Feb 25. Review.

PMID:
24567226
14.

Safety of 5 kHz tACS.

Chaieb L, Antal A, Pisoni A, Saiote C, Opitz A, Ambrus GG, Focke N, Paulus W.

Brain Stimul. 2014 Jan-Feb;7(1):92-6. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2013.08.004. Epub 2013 Sep 13.

PMID:
24064065
15.

Both the cutaneous sensation and phosphene perception are modulated in a frequency-specific manner during transcranial alternating current stimulation.

Turi Z, Ambrus GG, Janacsek K, Emmert K, Hahn L, Paulus W, Antal A.

Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2013;31(3):275-85. doi: 10.3233/RNN-120297.

PMID:
23478342
16.

The fade-in--short stimulation--fade out approach to sham tDCS--reliable at 1 mA for naïve and experienced subjects, but not investigators.

Ambrus GG, Al-Moyed H, Chaieb L, Sarp L, Antal A, Paulus W.

Brain Stimul. 2012 Oct;5(4):499-504. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2011.12.001. Epub 2012 Feb 22.

PMID:
22405745
17.

The enhancement of cortical excitability over the DLPFC before and during training impairs categorization in the prototype distortion task.

Ambrus GG, Zimmer M, Kincses ZT, Harza I, Kovács G, Paulus W, Antal A.

Neuropsychologia. 2011 Jun;49(7):1974-80. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.03.026. Epub 2011 Mar 31.

PMID:
21440562
18.

Comparing cutaneous perception induced by electrical stimulation using rectangular and round shaped electrodes.

Ambrus GG, Antal A, Paulus W.

Clin Neurophysiol. 2011 Apr;122(4):803-7. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2010.08.023. Epub 2010 Oct 25.

PMID:
20980196
19.

Cutaneous perception thresholds of electrical stimulation methods: comparison of tDCS and tRNS.

Ambrus GG, Paulus W, Antal A.

Clin Neurophysiol. 2010 Nov;121(11):1908-14. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2010.04.020. Epub 2010 May 14.

PMID:
20471313

Supplemental Content

Loading ...
Support Center