Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 17

1.

Differences between women who pursued genetic testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer and their at-risk relatives who did not.

Katapodi MC, Northouse L, Pierce P, Milliron KJ, Liu G, Merajver SD.

Oncol Nurs Forum. 2011 Sep;38(5):572-81. doi: 10.1188/11.ONF.572-581.

PMID:
21875844
2.

Accuracy and outcomes of screening mammography in women with a personal history of early-stage breast cancer.

Houssami N, Abraham LA, Miglioretti DL, Sickles EA, Kerlikowske K, Buist DS, Geller BM, Muss HB, Irwig L.

JAMA. 2011 Feb 23;305(8):790-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.188.

3.

Interventions to promote repeat breast cancer screening with mammography: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Vernon SW, McQueen A, Tiro JA, del Junco DJ.

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010 Jul 21;102(14):1023-39. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djq223. Epub 2010 Jun 29. Review.

4.

Cancer screening in the United States, 2010: a review of current American Cancer Society guidelines and issues in cancer screening.

Smith RA, Cokkinides V, Brooks D, Saslow D, Brawley OW.

CA Cancer J Clin. 2010 Mar-Apr;60(2):99-119. doi: 10.3322/caac.20063. Review.

5.

Behavioral constructs and mammography in five ethnic groups.

Stewart SL, Rakowski W, Pasick RJ.

Health Educ Behav. 2009 Oct;36(5 Suppl):36S-54S. doi: 10.1177/1090198109338918.

6.

A meta-analysis of interventions to promote mammography among ethnic minority women.

Han HR, Lee JE, Kim J, Hedlin HK, Song H, Kim MT.

Nurs Res. 2009 Jul-Aug;58(4):246-54. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0b013e3181ac0f7f. Review.

7.

Underestimation of breast cancer risk: influence on screening behavior.

Katapodi MC, Dodd MJ, Lee KA, Facione NC.

Oncol Nurs Forum. 2009 May;36(3):306-14. doi: 10.1188/09.ONF.306-314.

PMID:
19403452
8.

Do women in the community recognize hereditary and sporadic breast cancer risk factors?

Katapodi MC, Aouizerat BE.

Oncol Nurs Forum. 2005 May 10;32(3):617-23.

PMID:
15897936
9.

Genetic counseling for BRCA1/2: a randomized controlled trial of two strategies to facilitate the education and counseling process.

Wang C, Gonzalez R, Milliron KJ, Strecher VJ, Merajver SD.

Am J Med Genet A. 2005 Apr 1;134A(1):66-73.

10.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of interventions to enhance mammography compliance using computer modeling (CAN*TROL).

Wu JH, Fung MC, Chan W, Lairson DR.

Value Health. 2004 Mar-Apr;7(2):175-85. Review.

11.

Tailored and targeted health communication: strategies for enhancing information relevance.

Kreuter MW, Wray RJ.

Am J Health Behav. 2003 Nov-Dec;27 Suppl 3:S227-32. Review.

PMID:
14672383
12.

Personalized targeted mailing increases mammography among long-term noncompliant medicare beneficiaries: a randomized trial.

Harrison RV, Janz NK, Wolfe RA, Tedeschi PJ, Chernew M, Stross JK, Huang X, McMahon LF Jr.

Med Care. 2003 Mar;41(3):375-85.

PMID:
12618641
13.

The influence of social support on breast cancer screening in a multicultural community sample.

Katapodi MC, Facione NC, Miaskowski C, Dodd MJ, Waters C.

Oncol Nurs Forum. 2002 Jun;29(5):845-52.

PMID:
12058159
14.

Validating and improving models for projecting the absolute risk of breast cancer.

Gail MH, Costantino JP.

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001 Mar 7;93(5):334-5. No abstract available.

PMID:
11238688
15.

Confirmatory analysis of opinions regarding the pros and cons of mammography.

Rakowski W, Andersen MR, Stoddard AM, Urban N, Rimer BK, Lane DS, Fox SA, Costanza ME.

Health Psychol. 1997 Sep;16(5):433-41.

PMID:
9302540
16.

Family history and the risk of breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Pharoah PD, Day NE, Duffy S, Easton DF, Ponder BA.

Int J Cancer. 1997 May 29;71(5):800-9.

17.

Supplemental Content

Support Center